Evaluating the Effects of Digital Privacy Regulations on User Trust

Mehmet Berk Cetin
{"title":"Evaluating the Effects of Digital Privacy Regulations on User Trust","authors":"Mehmet Berk Cetin","doi":"arxiv-2409.02614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In today's digital society, issues related to digital privacy have become\nincreasingly important. Issues such as data breaches result in misuse of data,\nfinancial loss, and cyberbullying, which leads to less user trust in digital\nservices. This research investigates the impact of digital privacy laws on user\ntrust by comparing the regulations in the Netherlands, Ghana, and Malaysia. The\nstudy employs a comparative case study method, involving interviews with\ndigital privacy law experts, IT educators, and consumers from each country. The\nmain findings reveal that while the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)\nin the Netherlands is strict, its practical impact is limited by enforcement\nchallenges. In Ghana, the Data Protection Act is underutilized due to low\npublic awareness and insufficient enforcement, leading to reliance on personal\nprotective measures. In Malaysia, trust in digital services is largely\ndependent on the security practices of individual platforms rather than the\nPersonal Data Protection Act. The study highlights the importance of public\nawareness, effective enforcement, and cultural considerations in shaping the\neffectiveness of digital privacy laws. Based on these insights, a\nrecommendation framework is proposed to enhance digital privacy practices, also\naiming to provide valuable guidance for policymakers, businesses, and citizens\nin navigating the challenges of digitalization.","PeriodicalId":501112,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computers and Society","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computers and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.02614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In today's digital society, issues related to digital privacy have become increasingly important. Issues such as data breaches result in misuse of data, financial loss, and cyberbullying, which leads to less user trust in digital services. This research investigates the impact of digital privacy laws on user trust by comparing the regulations in the Netherlands, Ghana, and Malaysia. The study employs a comparative case study method, involving interviews with digital privacy law experts, IT educators, and consumers from each country. The main findings reveal that while the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the Netherlands is strict, its practical impact is limited by enforcement challenges. In Ghana, the Data Protection Act is underutilized due to low public awareness and insufficient enforcement, leading to reliance on personal protective measures. In Malaysia, trust in digital services is largely dependent on the security practices of individual platforms rather than the Personal Data Protection Act. The study highlights the importance of public awareness, effective enforcement, and cultural considerations in shaping the effectiveness of digital privacy laws. Based on these insights, a recommendation framework is proposed to enhance digital privacy practices, also aiming to provide valuable guidance for policymakers, businesses, and citizens in navigating the challenges of digitalization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估数字隐私法规对用户信任的影响
在当今的数字社会中,与数字隐私相关的问题变得越来越重要。数据泄露等问题会导致数据滥用、经济损失和网络欺凌,从而降低用户对数字服务的信任度。本研究通过比较荷兰、加纳和马来西亚的法规,调查数字隐私法对用户信任的影响。研究采用了比较案例研究法,对各国的数字隐私法专家、IT 教育工作者和消费者进行了访谈。主要研究结果表明,虽然荷兰的《通用数据保护条例》(GDPR)非常严格,但其实际影响却受到执法挑战的限制。在加纳,由于公众意识薄弱和执法力度不够,《数据保护法》未得到充分利用,导致人们对个人保护措施的依赖。在马来西亚,人们对数字服务的信任在很大程度上取决于各个平台的安全措施,而不是《个人数据保护法》。本研究强调了公众意识、有效执法和文化因素在影响数字隐私法有效性方面的重要性。基于这些见解,我们提出了一个建议框架来加强数字隐私实践,同时也旨在为政策制定者、企业和公民在应对数字化挑战时提供有价值的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Law-based and standards-oriented approach for privacy impact assessment in medical devices: a topic for lawyers, engineers and healthcare practitioners in MedTech Inside Out or Not: Privacy Implications of Emotional Disclosure Idiosyncratic properties of Australian STV election counting Gender Representation and Bias in Indian Civil Service Mock Interviews Reporting Non-Consensual Intimate Media: An Audit Study of Deepfakes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1