{"title":"Difference-in-differences with as few as two cross-sectional units -- A new perspective to the democracy-growth debate","authors":"Gilles Koumou, Emmanuel Selorm Tsyawo","doi":"arxiv-2408.13047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pooled panel analyses tend to mask heterogeneity in unit-specific treatment\neffects. For example, existing studies on the impact of democracy on economic\ngrowth do not reach a consensus as empirical findings are substantially\nheterogeneous in the country composition of the panel. In contrast to pooled\npanel analyses, this paper proposes a Difference-in-Differences (DiD) estimator\nthat exploits the temporal dimension in the data and estimates unit-specific\naverage treatment effects on the treated (ATT) with as few as two\ncross-sectional units. Under weak identification and temporal dependence\nconditions, the DiD estimator is asymptotically normal. The estimator is\nfurther complemented with a test of identification granted at least two\ncandidate control units. Empirical results using the DiD estimator suggest\nBenin's economy would have been 6.3% smaller on average over the 1993-2018\nperiod had she not democratised.","PeriodicalId":501293,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.13047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Pooled panel analyses tend to mask heterogeneity in unit-specific treatment
effects. For example, existing studies on the impact of democracy on economic
growth do not reach a consensus as empirical findings are substantially
heterogeneous in the country composition of the panel. In contrast to pooled
panel analyses, this paper proposes a Difference-in-Differences (DiD) estimator
that exploits the temporal dimension in the data and estimates unit-specific
average treatment effects on the treated (ATT) with as few as two
cross-sectional units. Under weak identification and temporal dependence
conditions, the DiD estimator is asymptotically normal. The estimator is
further complemented with a test of identification granted at least two
candidate control units. Empirical results using the DiD estimator suggest
Benin's economy would have been 6.3% smaller on average over the 1993-2018
period had she not democratised.