A survey of Large Language Model use in a hospital, research, and teaching campus

Loretta Gasparini, Nitya Phillipson, Daniel Capurro, Revital Rosenberg, Jim Buttery, Jayne Howley, Sarath Ranganathan, Catherine Quinlan, Niloufer Selvadurai, Michael Wildenauer, Michael South, Gerardo Luis Dimaguila
{"title":"A survey of Large Language Model use in a hospital, research, and teaching campus","authors":"Loretta Gasparini, Nitya Phillipson, Daniel Capurro, Revital Rosenberg, Jim Buttery, Jayne Howley, Sarath Ranganathan, Catherine Quinlan, Niloufer Selvadurai, Michael Wildenauer, Michael South, Gerardo Luis Dimaguila","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.11.24313512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The use of Large Language Models (LLMs) has exploded since November 2022 but there is sparse evidence regarding LLM use in health, medical and research contexts.\nObjective: To summarise the current uses of and attitudes towards LLMs across the clinical, research and teaching contexts in our campus.\nDesign: We administered a survey about LLM uses and attitudes. We conducted summary quantitative analysis and inductive qualitative analysis of free text responses.\nSetting: In August-September 2023, we circulated the survey amongst all staff and students across our campus (approximately n=7500), a fully integrated paediatric academic hospital and research institute.\nParticipants: We received 281 anonymous survey responses.\nMain outcome measures: We asked about participants' knowledge of LLMs, their current use of LLMs in professional or learning contexts, and perspectives on possible future uses, opportunities, and risks of LLM use.\nResults: Over 90% of respondents have heard of LLM tools and about two-thirds have used them in their work on our campus. Respondents reported using LLMs for a range of uses, including for generating or editing text and exploring ideas. Many, but not necessarily all, respondents seem aware of the limitations and potential risks of LLMs, including privacy and security risks. Various respondents expressed enthusiasm about opportunities of LLM use, including increased efficiency. Conclusions: Our findings show LLM tools are already widely used on our campus. Guidelines and governance are needed to keep up with practice. We have developed recommendations for the use of LLMs on our campus using insights from this survey.","PeriodicalId":501556,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.11.24313512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of Large Language Models (LLMs) has exploded since November 2022 but there is sparse evidence regarding LLM use in health, medical and research contexts. Objective: To summarise the current uses of and attitudes towards LLMs across the clinical, research and teaching contexts in our campus. Design: We administered a survey about LLM uses and attitudes. We conducted summary quantitative analysis and inductive qualitative analysis of free text responses. Setting: In August-September 2023, we circulated the survey amongst all staff and students across our campus (approximately n=7500), a fully integrated paediatric academic hospital and research institute. Participants: We received 281 anonymous survey responses. Main outcome measures: We asked about participants' knowledge of LLMs, their current use of LLMs in professional or learning contexts, and perspectives on possible future uses, opportunities, and risks of LLM use. Results: Over 90% of respondents have heard of LLM tools and about two-thirds have used them in their work on our campus. Respondents reported using LLMs for a range of uses, including for generating or editing text and exploring ideas. Many, but not necessarily all, respondents seem aware of the limitations and potential risks of LLMs, including privacy and security risks. Various respondents expressed enthusiasm about opportunities of LLM use, including increased efficiency. Conclusions: Our findings show LLM tools are already widely used on our campus. Guidelines and governance are needed to keep up with practice. We have developed recommendations for the use of LLMs on our campus using insights from this survey.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大型语言模型在医院、科研和教学场所使用情况调查
背景:自 2022 年 11 月以来,大型语言模型(LLM)的使用呈爆炸式增长,但有关 LLM 在健康、医疗和研究环境中使用的证据却很少:目的:总结目前在我们校园的临床、研究和教学环境中使用大型语言模型的情况以及对大型语言模型的态度:设计:我们就法律硕士的用途和态度进行了一项调查。我们对自由文本回答进行了总结性定量分析和归纳性定性分析:2023年8月至9月,我们在校园内的所有教职员工和学生(约7500人)中分发了调查问卷:我们收到了 281 份匿名调查回复:主要结果测量:我们询问了受访者对远程学习管理系统的了解、他们目前在专业或学习环境中使用远程学习管理系统的情况,以及对远程学习管理系统未来可能的用途、机遇和风险的看法:超过 90% 的受访者听说过 LLM 工具,约三分之二的受访者在校园工作中使用过 LLM 工具。受访者表示,使用 LLM 的目的多种多样,包括生成或编辑文本以及探索想法。许多(但不一定是全部)受访者似乎意识到了 LLM 的局限性和潜在风险,包括隐私和安全风险。不同的受访者对使用 LLM 的机会表示了热情,包括提高效率。结论:我们的调查结果表明,校内已经广泛使用了 LLM 工具。为了跟上实践的步伐,需要制定指导方针和进行管理。我们利用本次调查的洞察力,为在校园中使用 LLM 提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems on the Performance of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at Yumbe Regional referral hospital; A Pre-post quasi-experimental study design Plaintiff experiences of the medico-legal environment in Ireland “We’re here to help them if they want to come”: A qualitative exploration of hospital staff perceptions and experiences with outpatient non-attendance Improving Access and Efficiency of Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment Across Four Canadian Provinces: A Stepped-Wedge Trial I am a quarterback: A mixed methods study of death investigators' communication with family members of young sudden cardiac death victims from suspected heritable causes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1