DEVELOPMENT AND CROSS-VALIDATION OF A SHORT QUESTIONNAIRE TO EVALUATE SELF-REPORTED POSITIVE HEALTH; A CROSS SECTIONAL PANEL STUDY OF STRUCTURAL VALIDITY AMONG A GENERAL DUTCH POPULATION

Lenny M.W. Nahar-van Venrooij, Margot J. Metz, Marja van Vliet, Vera P. van Druten, Babette C. van der Zwaard
{"title":"DEVELOPMENT AND CROSS-VALIDATION OF A SHORT QUESTIONNAIRE TO EVALUATE SELF-REPORTED POSITIVE HEALTH; A CROSS SECTIONAL PANEL STUDY OF STRUCTURAL VALIDITY AMONG A GENERAL DUTCH POPULATION","authors":"Lenny M.W. Nahar-van Venrooij, Margot J. Metz, Marja van Vliet, Vera P. van Druten, Babette C. van der Zwaard","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.26.24312579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: In this study it was aimed to further develop and cross-validate a short questionnaire to measure self-reported Positive Health in general (Dutch) populations for evaluative purposes, stemming from the original 42 items of the My Positive Health dialogue tool (MPH). Positive Health refers to ′health from the perspective of patients and citizens′ following the concept of Huber et. al. Design and setting: A cross sectional study was performed among a panel representative for the general adult Dutch population living at home. Participants: Response rate was 76%, 1327 of a total of 2457 respondents were female, and mean age (year) was 53.3 ± 17.8. Methods: First, item reduction was carried out through content discussions following statistical output retrieved from factor structures and loadings, inter-item correlations (IIC) and internal consistency (Cronbach′s alphas). Next, among the other half of the study population, measurement properties for the developed short questionnaire were calculated using goodness of fit indices from confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). Results: The item reduction process (n=1199) resulted in a questionnaire of 22 items (PH22) with a four-factor structure and explained variance of 62.4%. Cronbach′s alphas were 0.84, 0.92, 0.81, and 0.78 for the renamed factors ′Physical fitness′ (5 items), ′Contentment with life′ (9 items), ′Daily life management′ (5 items) and ′Future perspective′ (3 items), respectively. Cross validation (n=1258) showed adequate goodness of fit indices of the PH22, based on both first- and second-order CFA. The scores of the PH22 were normally distributed. No floor or ceiling effects were present. Conclusions: A short 22 item questionnaire to measure self-reported Positive Health in a general (Dutch) population for evaluative purposes such as scientific or policy research at Positive Health or patient-centered interventions was developed and cross-validated, named PH22. This study supports its structural validity. To use this questionnaire in practice its test-retest reliability and responsiveness should be known also. Future research has to reveal this.","PeriodicalId":501556,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.26.24312579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In this study it was aimed to further develop and cross-validate a short questionnaire to measure self-reported Positive Health in general (Dutch) populations for evaluative purposes, stemming from the original 42 items of the My Positive Health dialogue tool (MPH). Positive Health refers to ′health from the perspective of patients and citizens′ following the concept of Huber et. al. Design and setting: A cross sectional study was performed among a panel representative for the general adult Dutch population living at home. Participants: Response rate was 76%, 1327 of a total of 2457 respondents were female, and mean age (year) was 53.3 ± 17.8. Methods: First, item reduction was carried out through content discussions following statistical output retrieved from factor structures and loadings, inter-item correlations (IIC) and internal consistency (Cronbach′s alphas). Next, among the other half of the study population, measurement properties for the developed short questionnaire were calculated using goodness of fit indices from confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). Results: The item reduction process (n=1199) resulted in a questionnaire of 22 items (PH22) with a four-factor structure and explained variance of 62.4%. Cronbach′s alphas were 0.84, 0.92, 0.81, and 0.78 for the renamed factors ′Physical fitness′ (5 items), ′Contentment with life′ (9 items), ′Daily life management′ (5 items) and ′Future perspective′ (3 items), respectively. Cross validation (n=1258) showed adequate goodness of fit indices of the PH22, based on both first- and second-order CFA. The scores of the PH22 were normally distributed. No floor or ceiling effects were present. Conclusions: A short 22 item questionnaire to measure self-reported Positive Health in a general (Dutch) population for evaluative purposes such as scientific or policy research at Positive Health or patient-centered interventions was developed and cross-validated, named PH22. This study supports its structural validity. To use this questionnaire in practice its test-retest reliability and responsiveness should be known also. Future research has to reveal this.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发和交叉验证用于评估自我报告的积极健康状况的简短问卷;在荷兰普通人群中开展的结构有效性横断面小组研究
研究目的本研究旨在进一步开发和交叉验证一份简短的调查问卷,以测量普通(荷兰)人群自我报告的积极健康状况,用于评估目的。该问卷源自 "我的积极健康 "对话工具(MPH)的原始 42 个项目。积极健康 "是指 "从患者和公民的角度来看健康",与 Huber 等人的概念一致。设计与环境:这项横断面研究的对象是居住在家中的荷兰成年人。参与调查者:回复率为 76%,2457 名受访者中有 1327 名女性,平均年龄(岁)为 53.3 ± 17.8。调查方法首先,根据因子结构和载荷、项目间相关性(IIC)和内部一致性(Cronbach′s alphas)的统计结果,通过内容讨论减少了项目。然后,在另一半研究对象中,使用确认性因素分析(CFA)的拟合度指数计算所编制的简短问卷的测量属性。研究结果经过项目缩减(n=1199)后,问卷共包含 22 个项目(PH22),具有四因素结构,解释方差为 62.4%。重新命名后的因子′身体健康′(5 个条目)、′对生活的满足感′(9 个条目)、′日常生活管理′(5 个条目)和′未来展望′(3 个条目)的克朗巴赫系数分别为 0.84、0.92、0.81 和 0.78。交叉验证(n=1258)显示,基于一阶和二阶 CFA,PH22 的拟合度指数足够高。PH22 的得分呈正态分布。不存在下限或上限效应。结论为评估积极健康或以患者为中心的干预措施的科学或政策研究等目的,我们开发了一份简短的 22 个项目的问卷,用于测量普通(荷兰)人群自我报告的积极健康状况,并进行了交叉验证,命名为 PH22。本研究支持其结构有效性。要在实践中使用该问卷,还应该了解其测试-再测试的可靠性和响应性。未来的研究必须揭示这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems on the Performance of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at Yumbe Regional referral hospital; A Pre-post quasi-experimental study design Plaintiff experiences of the medico-legal environment in Ireland “We’re here to help them if they want to come”: A qualitative exploration of hospital staff perceptions and experiences with outpatient non-attendance Improving Access and Efficiency of Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment Across Four Canadian Provinces: A Stepped-Wedge Trial I am a quarterback: A mixed methods study of death investigators' communication with family members of young sudden cardiac death victims from suspected heritable causes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1