DEVELOPMENT AND CROSS-VALIDATION OF A SHORT QUESTIONNAIRE TO EVALUATE SELF-REPORTED POSITIVE HEALTH; A CROSS SECTIONAL PANEL STUDY OF STRUCTURAL VALIDITY AMONG A GENERAL DUTCH POPULATION
Lenny M.W. Nahar-van Venrooij, Margot J. Metz, Marja van Vliet, Vera P. van Druten, Babette C. van der Zwaard
{"title":"DEVELOPMENT AND CROSS-VALIDATION OF A SHORT QUESTIONNAIRE TO EVALUATE SELF-REPORTED POSITIVE HEALTH; A CROSS SECTIONAL PANEL STUDY OF STRUCTURAL VALIDITY AMONG A GENERAL DUTCH POPULATION","authors":"Lenny M.W. Nahar-van Venrooij, Margot J. Metz, Marja van Vliet, Vera P. van Druten, Babette C. van der Zwaard","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.26.24312579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: In this study it was aimed to further develop and cross-validate a short questionnaire to measure self-reported Positive Health in general (Dutch) populations for evaluative purposes, stemming from the original 42 items of the My Positive Health dialogue tool (MPH). Positive Health refers to ′health from the perspective of patients and citizens′ following the concept of Huber et. al. Design and setting: A cross sectional study was performed among a panel representative for the general adult Dutch population living at home. Participants: Response rate was 76%, 1327 of a total of 2457 respondents were female, and mean age (year) was 53.3 ± 17.8. Methods: First, item reduction was carried out through content discussions following statistical output retrieved from factor structures and loadings, inter-item correlations (IIC) and internal consistency (Cronbach′s alphas). Next, among the other half of the study population, measurement properties for the developed short questionnaire were calculated using goodness of fit indices from confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). Results: The item reduction process (n=1199) resulted in a questionnaire of 22 items (PH22) with a four-factor structure and explained variance of 62.4%. Cronbach′s alphas were 0.84, 0.92, 0.81, and 0.78 for the renamed factors ′Physical fitness′ (5 items), ′Contentment with life′ (9 items), ′Daily life management′ (5 items) and ′Future perspective′ (3 items), respectively. Cross validation (n=1258) showed adequate goodness of fit indices of the PH22, based on both first- and second-order CFA. The scores of the PH22 were normally distributed. No floor or ceiling effects were present. Conclusions: A short 22 item questionnaire to measure self-reported Positive Health in a general (Dutch) population for evaluative purposes such as scientific or policy research at Positive Health or patient-centered interventions was developed and cross-validated, named PH22. This study supports its structural validity. To use this questionnaire in practice its test-retest reliability and responsiveness should be known also. Future research has to reveal this.","PeriodicalId":501556,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.26.24312579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: In this study it was aimed to further develop and cross-validate a short questionnaire to measure self-reported Positive Health in general (Dutch) populations for evaluative purposes, stemming from the original 42 items of the My Positive Health dialogue tool (MPH). Positive Health refers to ′health from the perspective of patients and citizens′ following the concept of Huber et. al. Design and setting: A cross sectional study was performed among a panel representative for the general adult Dutch population living at home. Participants: Response rate was 76%, 1327 of a total of 2457 respondents were female, and mean age (year) was 53.3 ± 17.8. Methods: First, item reduction was carried out through content discussions following statistical output retrieved from factor structures and loadings, inter-item correlations (IIC) and internal consistency (Cronbach′s alphas). Next, among the other half of the study population, measurement properties for the developed short questionnaire were calculated using goodness of fit indices from confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). Results: The item reduction process (n=1199) resulted in a questionnaire of 22 items (PH22) with a four-factor structure and explained variance of 62.4%. Cronbach′s alphas were 0.84, 0.92, 0.81, and 0.78 for the renamed factors ′Physical fitness′ (5 items), ′Contentment with life′ (9 items), ′Daily life management′ (5 items) and ′Future perspective′ (3 items), respectively. Cross validation (n=1258) showed adequate goodness of fit indices of the PH22, based on both first- and second-order CFA. The scores of the PH22 were normally distributed. No floor or ceiling effects were present. Conclusions: A short 22 item questionnaire to measure self-reported Positive Health in a general (Dutch) population for evaluative purposes such as scientific or policy research at Positive Health or patient-centered interventions was developed and cross-validated, named PH22. This study supports its structural validity. To use this questionnaire in practice its test-retest reliability and responsiveness should be known also. Future research has to reveal this.