“Differentiation is Sometimes a Hit and Miss”. Educator Perceptions of Differentiated Instruction in the Higher Education Sector

Pearl Subban, Muhamad Nanang Suprayogi, Melly Preston, Annisa Nanda Liyani, Andrea Prita Purnama Ratri
{"title":"“Differentiation is Sometimes a Hit and Miss”. Educator Perceptions of Differentiated Instruction in the Higher Education Sector","authors":"Pearl Subban, Muhamad Nanang Suprayogi, Melly Preston, Annisa Nanda Liyani, Andrea Prita Purnama Ratri","doi":"10.1007/s40299-024-00904-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Differentiated instruction is an effective means of addressing student diversity, and is increasingly being adopted by educators within the higher education sector. However, the global pandemic and changes to content delivery have altered the educational landscape. Hybridised delivery has resulted in the need for more innovative and contemporary means of accommodating student diversity, to suit both in-situ and remote learning platforms. Additionally, increasing student diversity in higher education has prompted a rethinking of how to accommodate student variance. This qualitative study sought to gauge the views of four educators, who were faced with hybridisation of content delivery during the global pandemic. Led by an overarching objective of ascertaining educator perceptions, responses and attitudes toward differentiated instruction, the study utilised four in-depth case studies to reflect on the implementation of differentiated instruction in the higher education sector. Results from this qualitative analysis yielded the view that time constraints, the coverage of prescribed content and increasing student diversity continue to act as barriers to authentic differentiation. While all showcased educators embraced the underlying philosophy of differentiating instruction to suit student needs, many were hampered by administrative duties which compromised their time and effort with regard to differentiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":501239,"journal":{"name":"The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher","volume":"105 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00904-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Differentiated instruction is an effective means of addressing student diversity, and is increasingly being adopted by educators within the higher education sector. However, the global pandemic and changes to content delivery have altered the educational landscape. Hybridised delivery has resulted in the need for more innovative and contemporary means of accommodating student diversity, to suit both in-situ and remote learning platforms. Additionally, increasing student diversity in higher education has prompted a rethinking of how to accommodate student variance. This qualitative study sought to gauge the views of four educators, who were faced with hybridisation of content delivery during the global pandemic. Led by an overarching objective of ascertaining educator perceptions, responses and attitudes toward differentiated instruction, the study utilised four in-depth case studies to reflect on the implementation of differentiated instruction in the higher education sector. Results from this qualitative analysis yielded the view that time constraints, the coverage of prescribed content and increasing student diversity continue to act as barriers to authentic differentiation. While all showcased educators embraced the underlying philosophy of differentiating instruction to suit student needs, many were hampered by administrative duties which compromised their time and effort with regard to differentiation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"差异化有时会一击即中"。教育工作者对高等教育领域差异化教学的看法
差异化教学是解决学生多样性问题的有效手段,越来越多的高等教育机构采用这种教学方法。然而,全球大流行病和教学内容的变化改变了教育格局。混合式教学需要更加创新和现代的手段来适应学生的多样性,以适应现场和远程学习平台。此外,高等教育中学生多样性的增加也促使人们重新思考如何适应学生的差异。这项定性研究试图了解四位教育工作者的观点,他们在全球大流行期间面临着混合内容交付的问题。在确定教育工作者对差异化教学的看法、反应和态度这一总体目标的引领下,本研究利用四项深入的案例研究,对高等教育部门实施差异化教学的情况进行了反思。定性分析的结果表明,时间限制、规定内容的覆盖面和学生多样性的增加仍然是真正差异化教学的障碍。尽管所有展示的教育工作者都拥护根据学生需求进行差异化教学的基本理念,但许多人都受到了行政职责的阻碍,影响了他们在差异化教学方面的时间和精力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“Differentiation is Sometimes a Hit and Miss”. Educator Perceptions of Differentiated Instruction in the Higher Education Sector Towards Inclusive Classrooms: Shaping South African Higher Education for Employability Comparative Study About the Impacts of Chinese Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) Feedback and Teacher Feedback on Middle School Students’ Writing Practice Measuring the Efficiency of Educational Institutions: Evidence from Primary and Secondary Public Schools in the Philippines Development and Validation of Teachers’ Professional Well-Being Scale: A Study of Secondary School Teachers in Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1