“That's not a super important point”: second-semester organic chemistry students’ lines of reasoning when comparing substitution reactions

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Chemistry Education Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1039/d4rp00086b
Ina Zaimi, Field M. Watts, David Kranz, Nicole Graulich, Ginger V. Shultz
{"title":"“That's not a super important point”: second-semester organic chemistry students’ lines of reasoning when comparing substitution reactions","authors":"Ina Zaimi, Field M. Watts, David Kranz, Nicole Graulich, Ginger V. Shultz","doi":"10.1039/d4rp00086b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Solving organic chemistry reactions requires reasoning with multiple concepts and data (<em>i.e.</em>, multivariate reasoning). However, studies have reported that organic chemistry students typically demonstrate univariate reasoning. Case comparisons, where students compare two or more tasks, have been reported to support students’ multivariate reasoning. Using a case-comparison task, we explored students’ multivariate reasoning. Our study was guided by the resources framework. One conceptual resource activates another conceptual resource and, successively, a set of conceptual resources. This successively activated set of resources is expressed in a line of reasoning. Pairing this framework with qualitative methods, we interviewed eleven second-semester organic chemistry students while they compared two substitution reaction mechanisms and chose the mechanism with the lower activation energy. We analysed what conceptual resources and lines of reasoning were activated and the variation to which students engaged in multivariate reasoning. Students activated multiple conceptual resources and, moreover, extended their activated resources into both developed and undeveloped lines of reasoning. When constructing their explanations, most students engaged in univariate reasoning. These students provided a developed line of reasoning selected from multiple activated resources, or they provided an undeveloped line of reasoning constructed from only one activated resource. Few students engaged in multivariate reasoning. These students provided both developed and undeveloped lines of reasoning from multiple activated resources. Our findings highlight the variation with which students engage in both univariate and multivariate reasoning. Therefore, we recommend that case-comparison activities scaffold engagement with multiple lines of reasoning in addition to activating and developing them.","PeriodicalId":69,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d4rp00086b","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Solving organic chemistry reactions requires reasoning with multiple concepts and data (i.e., multivariate reasoning). However, studies have reported that organic chemistry students typically demonstrate univariate reasoning. Case comparisons, where students compare two or more tasks, have been reported to support students’ multivariate reasoning. Using a case-comparison task, we explored students’ multivariate reasoning. Our study was guided by the resources framework. One conceptual resource activates another conceptual resource and, successively, a set of conceptual resources. This successively activated set of resources is expressed in a line of reasoning. Pairing this framework with qualitative methods, we interviewed eleven second-semester organic chemistry students while they compared two substitution reaction mechanisms and chose the mechanism with the lower activation energy. We analysed what conceptual resources and lines of reasoning were activated and the variation to which students engaged in multivariate reasoning. Students activated multiple conceptual resources and, moreover, extended their activated resources into both developed and undeveloped lines of reasoning. When constructing their explanations, most students engaged in univariate reasoning. These students provided a developed line of reasoning selected from multiple activated resources, or they provided an undeveloped line of reasoning constructed from only one activated resource. Few students engaged in multivariate reasoning. These students provided both developed and undeveloped lines of reasoning from multiple activated resources. Our findings highlight the variation with which students engage in both univariate and multivariate reasoning. Therefore, we recommend that case-comparison activities scaffold engagement with multiple lines of reasoning in addition to activating and developing them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"这不是超级重要的一点":第二学期有机化学学生在比较取代反应时的推理思路
解决有机化学反应需要利用多种概念和数据进行推理(即多元推理)。然而,有研究报告称,有机化学学生通常表现出单变量推理。据报道,案例比较(学生对两个或多个任务进行比较)有助于学生进行多元推理。通过案例比较任务,我们探索了学生的多元推理能力。我们的研究以资源框架为指导。一个概念资源会激活另一个概念资源,进而激活一组概念资源。这一系列相继激活的资源表现为推理过程。将这一框架与定性方法相结合,我们采访了 11 名有机化学第二学期的学生,让他们比较两种取代反应机理,并选择活化能较低的机理。我们分析了激活了哪些概念资源和推理思路,以及学生参与多元推理的变化情况。学生们激活了多种概念资源,而且还将其激活的资源扩展到了已发展和未发展的推理思路中。在构建解释时,大多数学生都进行了单变量推理。这些学生从多个被激活的资源中选择了一个已发展的推理思路,或者只从一个被激活的资源中构建了一个未发展的推理思路。很少有学生进行多元推理。这些学生从多个被激活的资源中提供了已发展和未发展的推理思路。我们的研究结果凸显了学生在进行单变量和多变量推理时的差异。因此,我们建议在案例比较活动中,除了激活和发展多种推理思路外,还要为学生参与多种推理思路提供支架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
26.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal for teachers, researchers and other practitioners in chemistry education.
期刊最新文献
Guidance on the data availability statement requirement in CERP The use of mobile technology in abductive inquiry-based teaching and learning of chemical bonding Improving the teaching of entropy and the second law of thermodynamics: a systematic review with meta-analysis “I’m still here and I want them to know that”: experiences of chemists with concealable identities in undergraduate research A lack of impact of pedagogy (peer-led team learning compared with didactic instruction) on long-term student knowledge of chemical equilibrium
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1