Evaluation of gingival thickness obtained from intraoral scanning registration with cone beam computed tomography at different acquisition modes

Luiz Eduardo Marinho-Vieira, Maria Clara Rodrigues Pinheiro, Deborah Queiroz Freitas, Reinhilde Jacobs, Christiano de Oliveira-Santos, Alexander Tadeu Sverzut, Matheus L. Oliveira
{"title":"Evaluation of gingival thickness obtained from intraoral scanning registration with cone beam computed tomography at different acquisition modes","authors":"Luiz Eduardo Marinho-Vieira, Maria Clara Rodrigues Pinheiro, Deborah Queiroz Freitas, Reinhilde Jacobs, Christiano de Oliveira-Santos, Alexander Tadeu Sverzut, Matheus L. Oliveira","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To investigate the reliability of gingival thickness measurements obtained from the registration of intraoral scans with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) examinations at different acquisition modes. CBCT examinations of 9 porcine hemimandibles were acquired using the OP300 Maxio unit operating at the highest-dose protocol with the smallest voxel size as the reference standard for visualizing the gingival surface. Subsequently, the hemimandibles were surrounded by water to simulate soft tissue attenuation of radiation, and additional CBCT examinations were acquired in 4 modes: Endo, High-resolution, Standard-resolution, and Low-dose. These CBCT datasets were registered with corresponding intraoral scans obtained with the Carestream Dental 3600 intraoral scanning system using the Blue Sky Plan 4 software. Four oral radiologists measured the buccal gingival thickness on cross-sectional reconstructions at 4 measurement sites and 2 distances from the gingival margin in the CBCT reference standard examinations and examinations obtained with water and intraoral scan registration. Multifactorial analysis of variance was used to assess the influence of acquisition mode, measurement site, and distance from the gingival margin on measurements (α = 5%; statistical power = 90%). Buccal gingival thickness measurements obtained via CBCT after registration with intraoral scanning were not significantly influenced by acquisition mode ( = .153) or measurement site ( = .089). Gingival thickness measurements derived from the registration of intraoral scans with CBCT examinations at different acquisition modes appear to be reliable.","PeriodicalId":501075,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2024.08.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To investigate the reliability of gingival thickness measurements obtained from the registration of intraoral scans with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) examinations at different acquisition modes. CBCT examinations of 9 porcine hemimandibles were acquired using the OP300 Maxio unit operating at the highest-dose protocol with the smallest voxel size as the reference standard for visualizing the gingival surface. Subsequently, the hemimandibles were surrounded by water to simulate soft tissue attenuation of radiation, and additional CBCT examinations were acquired in 4 modes: Endo, High-resolution, Standard-resolution, and Low-dose. These CBCT datasets were registered with corresponding intraoral scans obtained with the Carestream Dental 3600 intraoral scanning system using the Blue Sky Plan 4 software. Four oral radiologists measured the buccal gingival thickness on cross-sectional reconstructions at 4 measurement sites and 2 distances from the gingival margin in the CBCT reference standard examinations and examinations obtained with water and intraoral scan registration. Multifactorial analysis of variance was used to assess the influence of acquisition mode, measurement site, and distance from the gingival margin on measurements (α = 5%; statistical power = 90%). Buccal gingival thickness measurements obtained via CBCT after registration with intraoral scanning were not significantly influenced by acquisition mode ( = .153) or measurement site ( = .089). Gingival thickness measurements derived from the registration of intraoral scans with CBCT examinations at different acquisition modes appear to be reliable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用锥束计算机断层扫描评估不同采集模式下通过口内扫描登记获得的牙龈厚度
目的:研究在不同采集模式下,通过口内扫描与锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)检查的配准所获得的牙龈厚度测量值的可靠性。使用 OP300 Maxio 设备,以最高剂量协议和最小体素尺寸作为牙龈表面可视化的参考标准,对 9 个猪半颌进行 CBCT 检查。随后,在半颌骨周围用水模拟软组织对辐射的衰减,并以 4 种模式进行额外的 CBCT 检查:内窥镜、高分辨率、标准分辨率和低剂量。这些 CBCT 数据集与使用蓝天计划 4 软件的 Carestream Dental 3600 口内扫描系统获得的相应口内扫描数据进行了登记。四名口腔放射科医生在 CBCT 参考标准检查和用水及口内扫描登记获得的检查中,在距离龈缘 4 个测量点和 2 个距离的横截面重建上测量了颊面龈厚度。多因素方差分析用于评估采集模式、测量部位和龈缘距离对测量结果的影响(α = 5%;统计功率 = 90%)。通过口内扫描登记后的 CBCT 获得的颊面龈厚度测量值不受采集模式(= 0.153)或测量部位(= 0.089)的显著影响。在不同采集模式下,通过口内扫描与 CBCT 检查配准得到的牙龈厚度测量结果似乎是可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predictive value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, platelet to lymphocyte ratio, and systemic inflammatory index for detection of recurrence of pleomorphic adenoma of the major salivary glands: a multicenter study SATB2 expression in oral sarcomatoid (spindle cell) squamous cell carcinoma: clinicopathologic and immunophenotypic characterization of 10 cases A retrospective comparative study of extensive sinus membrane perforations repairing using collagen membranes with pouch and nonpouch techniques Ulcerated mass and radiolucency of the left mandible Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical aspects of conventional and unicystic canalicular adenoma: a case series
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1