‘Shall I compare thee?’ Evaluating Finance Ministers

IF 0.5 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Administration Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.2478/admin-2024-0016
Stephen Moore, John Considine
{"title":"‘Shall I compare thee?’ Evaluating Finance Ministers","authors":"Stephen Moore, John Considine","doi":"10.2478/admin-2024-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past century, the methods used to evaluate Finance Ministers have evolved from the close scrutiny of individual biographies to the statistical analysis of aggregated data. This paper explores this evolution within the framework of economic theory and applies the results in an Irish context. It concludes that while statistical methods can provide some support for certain hypotheses, they are not yet advanced enough to entirely replace the traditional political economy approach.","PeriodicalId":41890,"journal":{"name":"Administration","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/admin-2024-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past century, the methods used to evaluate Finance Ministers have evolved from the close scrutiny of individual biographies to the statistical analysis of aggregated data. This paper explores this evolution within the framework of economic theory and applies the results in an Irish context. It concludes that while statistical methods can provide some support for certain hypotheses, they are not yet advanced enough to entirely replace the traditional political economy approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我应该与你比较吗?评估财政部长
在过去的一个世纪中,用于评价财政部长的方法已经从仔细研究个人履历发展到对综合数据进行统计分析。本文在经济理论框架内探讨了这一演变,并将结果应用于爱尔兰的情况。本文的结论是,虽然统计方法可以为某些假设提供一些支持,但其先进性还不足以完全取代传统的政治经济学方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Administration
Administration PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Administration is the peer-reviewed journal of the Institute of Public Administration of Ireland. It has been published quarterly since 1953. As the principal journal concerned with Irish public administration and its development, it seeks to combine original scholarship on public administration from a variety of disciplines with the insights and experiences of practitioners. In addition to research articles, which are double blind peer reviewed, the journal welcomes comments on articles, opinion pieces, letters, notices, reports and reviews.
期刊最新文献
Social care work and social work in Ireland: a comparative analysis of standards of proficiency ‘Shall I compare thee?’ Evaluating Finance Ministers Regulating more? Comparing Ireland’s original and amended lobbying legislation Social care managers’ perspectives on statutory registration of social care workers in Ireland Housing and the West Cork islands: a national crisis in microcosm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1