Curriculum analytics: Exploring assessment objectives, types, and grades in a study program

IF 4.8 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Education and Information Technologies Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1007/s10639-024-13015-0
Jelena Jovanović, Andrew Zamecnik, Abhinava Barthakur, Shane Dawson
{"title":"Curriculum analytics: Exploring assessment objectives, types, and grades in a study program","authors":"Jelena Jovanović, Andrew Zamecnik, Abhinava Barthakur, Shane Dawson","doi":"10.1007/s10639-024-13015-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Higher education institutions are increasingly seeking ways to leverage the available educational data to make program and course quality improvements. The development of automated curriculum analytics can play a substantial role in this effort by bringing novel and timely insights into course and program quality. However, the adoption of curriculum analytics for program quality assurance has been impeded by a lack of accessible and scalable data-informed methods that can be employed to evaluate assessment practices and ensure their alignment with the curriculum objectives. Presently, this work remains a manual and resource intensive endeavour. In response to this challenge, we present an exploratory curriculum analytics approach that allows for scalable, semi-automated examination of the alignment between assessments and learning objectives at the program level. The method employs a comprehensive representation of assessment objectives (i.e., learning objectives associated with assessments), to encode the domain specific and general knowledge, as well as the specific skills the implemented assessments are designed to measure. The proposed method uses this representation for clustering assessment objectives within a study program, and proceeds with an exploratory analysis of the resulting clusters of objectives in relation to the corresponding assessment types and student assessment grades. We demonstrate and discuss the capacity of the proposed method to offer an initial insight into alignment of assessment objectives and practice, using the assessment-related data from an undergraduate study program in information systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":51494,"journal":{"name":"Education and Information Technologies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Information Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13015-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Higher education institutions are increasingly seeking ways to leverage the available educational data to make program and course quality improvements. The development of automated curriculum analytics can play a substantial role in this effort by bringing novel and timely insights into course and program quality. However, the adoption of curriculum analytics for program quality assurance has been impeded by a lack of accessible and scalable data-informed methods that can be employed to evaluate assessment practices and ensure their alignment with the curriculum objectives. Presently, this work remains a manual and resource intensive endeavour. In response to this challenge, we present an exploratory curriculum analytics approach that allows for scalable, semi-automated examination of the alignment between assessments and learning objectives at the program level. The method employs a comprehensive representation of assessment objectives (i.e., learning objectives associated with assessments), to encode the domain specific and general knowledge, as well as the specific skills the implemented assessments are designed to measure. The proposed method uses this representation for clustering assessment objectives within a study program, and proceeds with an exploratory analysis of the resulting clusters of objectives in relation to the corresponding assessment types and student assessment grades. We demonstrate and discuss the capacity of the proposed method to offer an initial insight into alignment of assessment objectives and practice, using the assessment-related data from an undergraduate study program in information systems.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
课程分析:探索学习计划中的评估目标、类型和等级
高等教育机构越来越多地寻求利用现有教育数据来提高课程和教学质量的方法。自动化课程分析的发展可以为课程和项目质量带来新颖而及时的见解,从而在这方面发挥重要作用。然而,由于缺乏可用的、可扩展的、以数据为依据的方法来评估评估实践,并确保其与课程目标相一致,课程分析在课程质量保证方面的应用一直受到阻碍。目前,这项工作仍然需要大量人力和资源。为了应对这一挑战,我们提出了一种探索性的课程分析方法,可以在课程层面对评估与学习目标之间的一致性进行可扩展的半自动化检查。该方法采用了评估目标(即与评估相关的学习目标)的综合表示法,以编码特定领域和一般知识,以及实施评估旨在衡量的特定技能。所提出的方法使用这种表示法对学习计划中的评估目标进行聚类,并对由此产生的目标聚类与相应的评估类型和学生评估等级的关系进行探索性分析。我们利用一个信息系统本科学习项目中与评估相关的数据,展示并讨论了所提方法的能力,为评估目标与实践的一致性提供了初步见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Education and Information Technologies
Education and Information Technologies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
610
期刊介绍: The Journal of Education and Information Technologies (EAIT) is a platform for the range of debates and issues in the field of Computing Education as well as the many uses of information and communication technology (ICT) across many educational subjects and sectors. It probes the use of computing to improve education and learning in a variety of settings, platforms and environments. The journal aims to provide perspectives at all levels, from the micro level of specific pedagogical approaches in Computing Education and applications or instances of use in classrooms, to macro concerns of national policies and major projects; from pre-school classes to adults in tertiary institutions; from teachers and administrators to researchers and designers; from institutions to online and lifelong learning. The journal is embedded in the research and practice of professionals within the contemporary global context and its breadth and scope encourage debate on fundamental issues at all levels and from different research paradigms and learning theories. The journal does not proselytize on behalf of the technologies (whether they be mobile, desktop, interactive, virtual, games-based or learning management systems) but rather provokes debate on all the complex relationships within and between computing and education, whether they are in informal or formal settings. It probes state of the art technologies in Computing Education and it also considers the design and evaluation of digital educational artefacts.  The journal aims to maintain and expand its international standing by careful selection on merit of the papers submitted, thus providing a credible ongoing forum for debate and scholarly discourse. Special Issues are occasionally published to cover particular issues in depth. EAIT invites readers to submit papers that draw inferences, probe theory and create new knowledge that informs practice, policy and scholarship. Readers are also invited to comment and reflect upon the argument and opinions published. EAIT is the official journal of the Technical Committee on Education of the International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP) in partnership with UNESCO.
期刊最新文献
Development of a virtual reality creative enhancement system utilizing haptic vibration feedback via electroencephalography Is ChatGPT like a nine-year-old child in theory of mind? Evidence from Chinese writing Analysing factors influencing undergraduates’ adoption of intelligent physical education systems using an expanded TAM The importance of aligning instructor age with learning content in designing instructional videos for older adults Evaluating classroom response systems in engineering education: Which metrics better reflect student performance?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1