{"title":"Intelligent personal assistants in self-access L2 vocabulary learning","authors":"Assim S. Alrajhi","doi":"10.1007/s10639-024-12967-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Motivated by the proliferation of artificial intelligence that has the potential to promote self-access learning, this study utilizes a sequential explanatory quasi-experimental mixed methods design to investigate the efficacy of Google Assistant (GA) in facilitating second language (L2) vocabulary learning compared to online dictionaries. A cohort of EFL university students (<i>n</i> = 74) was assigned to two groups: a control group using online dictionaries and an experimental group utilizing GA. Over six learning sessions, both groups learned 10% of Coxhead’s (2000) Academic Vocabulary List. With data drawn from multiple sources, including pre- and post-tests, a survey questionnaire, and individual interviews, the findings reveal significant improvements in vocabulary knowledge for both groups, indicating that GA can be utilized as an effective vocabulary learning tool. Despite concerns regarding the quality of GA’s voice recognition as a potential demotivating factor, learners hold positive views on the efficacy of GA. These perceptions reflect influential factors primarily situated within the cognitive and affective domains of learning. Accordingly, key affordances and limitations of GA are identified. This study proposes pedagogical implications and outlines potential avenues for further research in the domain of intelligent personal assistants-assisted L2 vocabulary learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":51494,"journal":{"name":"Education and Information Technologies","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Information Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12967-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Motivated by the proliferation of artificial intelligence that has the potential to promote self-access learning, this study utilizes a sequential explanatory quasi-experimental mixed methods design to investigate the efficacy of Google Assistant (GA) in facilitating second language (L2) vocabulary learning compared to online dictionaries. A cohort of EFL university students (n = 74) was assigned to two groups: a control group using online dictionaries and an experimental group utilizing GA. Over six learning sessions, both groups learned 10% of Coxhead’s (2000) Academic Vocabulary List. With data drawn from multiple sources, including pre- and post-tests, a survey questionnaire, and individual interviews, the findings reveal significant improvements in vocabulary knowledge for both groups, indicating that GA can be utilized as an effective vocabulary learning tool. Despite concerns regarding the quality of GA’s voice recognition as a potential demotivating factor, learners hold positive views on the efficacy of GA. These perceptions reflect influential factors primarily situated within the cognitive and affective domains of learning. Accordingly, key affordances and limitations of GA are identified. This study proposes pedagogical implications and outlines potential avenues for further research in the domain of intelligent personal assistants-assisted L2 vocabulary learning.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Education and Information Technologies (EAIT) is a platform for the range of debates and issues in the field of Computing Education as well as the many uses of information and communication technology (ICT) across many educational subjects and sectors. It probes the use of computing to improve education and learning in a variety of settings, platforms and environments.
The journal aims to provide perspectives at all levels, from the micro level of specific pedagogical approaches in Computing Education and applications or instances of use in classrooms, to macro concerns of national policies and major projects; from pre-school classes to adults in tertiary institutions; from teachers and administrators to researchers and designers; from institutions to online and lifelong learning. The journal is embedded in the research and practice of professionals within the contemporary global context and its breadth and scope encourage debate on fundamental issues at all levels and from different research paradigms and learning theories. The journal does not proselytize on behalf of the technologies (whether they be mobile, desktop, interactive, virtual, games-based or learning management systems) but rather provokes debate on all the complex relationships within and between computing and education, whether they are in informal or formal settings. It probes state of the art technologies in Computing Education and it also considers the design and evaluation of digital educational artefacts. The journal aims to maintain and expand its international standing by careful selection on merit of the papers submitted, thus providing a credible ongoing forum for debate and scholarly discourse. Special Issues are occasionally published to cover particular issues in depth. EAIT invites readers to submit papers that draw inferences, probe theory and create new knowledge that informs practice, policy and scholarship. Readers are also invited to comment and reflect upon the argument and opinions published. EAIT is the official journal of the Technical Committee on Education of the International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP) in partnership with UNESCO.