The impact of teachers' perceptions of the effectiveness of formal and informal technology learning on technology usage intentions

IF 4.8 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Education and Information Technologies Pub Date : 2024-08-31 DOI:10.1007/s10639-024-12975-7
Minchul Shin, Innwoo Park
{"title":"The impact of teachers' perceptions of the effectiveness of formal and informal technology learning on technology usage intentions","authors":"Minchul Shin, Innwoo Park","doi":"10.1007/s10639-024-12975-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigated the impact of teachers' perceptions of the effectiveness of formal and informal technology learning on their intention to use technology, mediated by technology self-efficacy and digital literacy, within a structural relationship framework. The research model included formal technology learning types such as in-person and remote training, and informal types like learning through media, learning through experience and reflection, interaction with peers, and participation in professional learning communities. The results showed that only learning through media had a significant positive influence on the technology usage intention. Among the mediating factors, only digital literacy demonstrated a significant direct effect on technology usage intention. The study further revealed that the perceived effectiveness of formal learning types, in-person and remote training, and informal type, personal learning through media, positively correlated with both technology self-efficacy and digital literacy. However, other informal learning types did not exhibit significant relationships with these mediating variables. In terms of mediating effects, significant mediation was found only when digital literacy mediated the relationship between the effectiveness perception of certain learning types and technology usage intention, while technology self-efficacy did not demonstrate significant mediation. Based on these findings, this study presents implications for effective application strategies of formal and informal technology learning to enhance teachers' intentions to use technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":51494,"journal":{"name":"Education and Information Technologies","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Information Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12975-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of teachers' perceptions of the effectiveness of formal and informal technology learning on their intention to use technology, mediated by technology self-efficacy and digital literacy, within a structural relationship framework. The research model included formal technology learning types such as in-person and remote training, and informal types like learning through media, learning through experience and reflection, interaction with peers, and participation in professional learning communities. The results showed that only learning through media had a significant positive influence on the technology usage intention. Among the mediating factors, only digital literacy demonstrated a significant direct effect on technology usage intention. The study further revealed that the perceived effectiveness of formal learning types, in-person and remote training, and informal type, personal learning through media, positively correlated with both technology self-efficacy and digital literacy. However, other informal learning types did not exhibit significant relationships with these mediating variables. In terms of mediating effects, significant mediation was found only when digital literacy mediated the relationship between the effectiveness perception of certain learning types and technology usage intention, while technology self-efficacy did not demonstrate significant mediation. Based on these findings, this study presents implications for effective application strategies of formal and informal technology learning to enhance teachers' intentions to use technology.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师对正规和非正规技术学习效果的看法对技术使用意向的影响
本研究在结构关系框架内,通过技术自我效能感和数字素养,调查了教师对正规和非正规技术学习效果的看法对其技术使用意愿的影响。研究模型包括正式技术学习类型,如面对面培训和远程培训,以及非正式学习类型,如通过媒体学习、通过经验和反思学习、与同行互动以及参与专业学习社区。结果显示,只有通过媒体学习对技术使用意向有显著的积极影响。在中介因素中,只有数字素养对技术使用意向有明显的直接影响。研究进一步显示,正式学习类型(面对面培训和远程培训)和非正式学习类型(通过媒体进行的个人学习)的感知效果与技术自我效能感和数字素养呈正相关。然而,其他非正式学习类型与这些中介变量之间的关系并不显著。在中介效应方面,只有当数字素养中介了某些学习类型的有效性感知与技术使用意向之间的关系时,才发现了显著的中介效应,而技术自我效能感则没有表现出显著的中介效应。基于这些发现,本研究提出了正式和非正式技术学习的有效应用策略,以提高教师的技术使用意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Education and Information Technologies
Education and Information Technologies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
610
期刊介绍: The Journal of Education and Information Technologies (EAIT) is a platform for the range of debates and issues in the field of Computing Education as well as the many uses of information and communication technology (ICT) across many educational subjects and sectors. It probes the use of computing to improve education and learning in a variety of settings, platforms and environments. The journal aims to provide perspectives at all levels, from the micro level of specific pedagogical approaches in Computing Education and applications or instances of use in classrooms, to macro concerns of national policies and major projects; from pre-school classes to adults in tertiary institutions; from teachers and administrators to researchers and designers; from institutions to online and lifelong learning. The journal is embedded in the research and practice of professionals within the contemporary global context and its breadth and scope encourage debate on fundamental issues at all levels and from different research paradigms and learning theories. The journal does not proselytize on behalf of the technologies (whether they be mobile, desktop, interactive, virtual, games-based or learning management systems) but rather provokes debate on all the complex relationships within and between computing and education, whether they are in informal or formal settings. It probes state of the art technologies in Computing Education and it also considers the design and evaluation of digital educational artefacts.  The journal aims to maintain and expand its international standing by careful selection on merit of the papers submitted, thus providing a credible ongoing forum for debate and scholarly discourse. Special Issues are occasionally published to cover particular issues in depth. EAIT invites readers to submit papers that draw inferences, probe theory and create new knowledge that informs practice, policy and scholarship. Readers are also invited to comment and reflect upon the argument and opinions published. EAIT is the official journal of the Technical Committee on Education of the International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP) in partnership with UNESCO.
期刊最新文献
Development of a virtual reality creative enhancement system utilizing haptic vibration feedback via electroencephalography Is ChatGPT like a nine-year-old child in theory of mind? Evidence from Chinese writing Analysing factors influencing undergraduates’ adoption of intelligent physical education systems using an expanded TAM The importance of aligning instructor age with learning content in designing instructional videos for older adults Evaluating classroom response systems in engineering education: Which metrics better reflect student performance?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1