Investigating pre-service TCSL teachers’ technology integration competency through a content-based AI-inclusive framework

IF 4.8 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Education and Information Technologies Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1007/s10639-024-12982-8
Guanyao Xu, Aiqing Yu, Cong Xu, Xianquan Liu, Guy Trainin
{"title":"Investigating pre-service TCSL teachers’ technology integration competency through a content-based AI-inclusive framework","authors":"Guanyao Xu, Aiqing Yu, Cong Xu, Xianquan Liu, Guy Trainin","doi":"10.1007/s10639-024-12982-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Students’ behavior and academic achievement are improved when technology is integrated into instruction in ways that support learning. Technology integration competency (TIC) has become a critical capacity for second language (L2) pre-service teachers in the digital era. However, the significance of such competency has been neglected in the field of teaching Chinese as a second language (TCSL). This study developed a framework to investigate pre-service TCSL teachers’ TIC. The framework was developed by modifying the existing International Society for Technology in Education Standards for Educators (ISTE-SE). It was tailored to be used within the context of L2 teaching. The framework also incorporated artificial intelligence (AI) concepts in addition to being content based. The structural relationships between pre-service teachers’ TIC and the influencing factors were analyzed through structural equation modeling (SEM). The results revealed that, among the seven factors describing an educator’s TIC, pre-service TCSL teachers had reached the highest level of technology-competency in Analyst and the lowest level in Designer. Furthermore, pre-service TCSL teachers’ TIC was significantly affected by their technology course completion and grade level in the teacher education programs, though the strength of both relationships was small. This study made several recommendations for a strategic enhancement of TCSL teacher education programs, emphasizing continuous development of TIC across various educator roles and academic levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":51494,"journal":{"name":"Education and Information Technologies","volume":"161 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Information Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12982-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Students’ behavior and academic achievement are improved when technology is integrated into instruction in ways that support learning. Technology integration competency (TIC) has become a critical capacity for second language (L2) pre-service teachers in the digital era. However, the significance of such competency has been neglected in the field of teaching Chinese as a second language (TCSL). This study developed a framework to investigate pre-service TCSL teachers’ TIC. The framework was developed by modifying the existing International Society for Technology in Education Standards for Educators (ISTE-SE). It was tailored to be used within the context of L2 teaching. The framework also incorporated artificial intelligence (AI) concepts in addition to being content based. The structural relationships between pre-service teachers’ TIC and the influencing factors were analyzed through structural equation modeling (SEM). The results revealed that, among the seven factors describing an educator’s TIC, pre-service TCSL teachers had reached the highest level of technology-competency in Analyst and the lowest level in Designer. Furthermore, pre-service TCSL teachers’ TIC was significantly affected by their technology course completion and grade level in the teacher education programs, though the strength of both relationships was small. This study made several recommendations for a strategic enhancement of TCSL teacher education programs, emphasizing continuous development of TIC across various educator roles and academic levels.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过基于内容的人工智能包容性框架,研究职前非母语教师的技术整合能力
当技术以支持学习的方式融入教学时,学生的行为和学业成绩都会得到改善。在数字化时代,技术整合能力(TIC)已成为第二语言(L2)职前教师的一项重要能力。然而,在汉语作为第二语言(TCSL)的教学领域,这种能力的重要性一直被忽视。本研究建立了一个框架来研究职前汉语教师的TIC。该框架是通过修改现有的《国际教育技术协会教育工作者标准》(ISTE-SE)制定的。该框架是为在 L2 教学中使用而量身定制的。除了基于内容之外,该框架还纳入了人工智能(AI)概念。研究通过结构方程模型(SEM)分析了职前教师 TIC 与影响因素之间的结构关系。结果表明,在描述教育者技术与创新能力的七个因素中,职前双语教师在 "分析 "方面的技术能力水平最高,在 "设计 "方面的技术能力水平最低。此外,教师教育项目中的技术课程完成情况和年级也对职前英语教师的技术能力指数产生了重大影响,但两者之间的关系强度较小。这项研究提出了几项建议,以战略性地加强全科教学教师教育项目,强调在不同的教育角色和学术水平上持续发展全科教学能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Education and Information Technologies
Education and Information Technologies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
610
期刊介绍: The Journal of Education and Information Technologies (EAIT) is a platform for the range of debates and issues in the field of Computing Education as well as the many uses of information and communication technology (ICT) across many educational subjects and sectors. It probes the use of computing to improve education and learning in a variety of settings, platforms and environments. The journal aims to provide perspectives at all levels, from the micro level of specific pedagogical approaches in Computing Education and applications or instances of use in classrooms, to macro concerns of national policies and major projects; from pre-school classes to adults in tertiary institutions; from teachers and administrators to researchers and designers; from institutions to online and lifelong learning. The journal is embedded in the research and practice of professionals within the contemporary global context and its breadth and scope encourage debate on fundamental issues at all levels and from different research paradigms and learning theories. The journal does not proselytize on behalf of the technologies (whether they be mobile, desktop, interactive, virtual, games-based or learning management systems) but rather provokes debate on all the complex relationships within and between computing and education, whether they are in informal or formal settings. It probes state of the art technologies in Computing Education and it also considers the design and evaluation of digital educational artefacts.  The journal aims to maintain and expand its international standing by careful selection on merit of the papers submitted, thus providing a credible ongoing forum for debate and scholarly discourse. Special Issues are occasionally published to cover particular issues in depth. EAIT invites readers to submit papers that draw inferences, probe theory and create new knowledge that informs practice, policy and scholarship. Readers are also invited to comment and reflect upon the argument and opinions published. EAIT is the official journal of the Technical Committee on Education of the International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP) in partnership with UNESCO.
期刊最新文献
Development of a virtual reality creative enhancement system utilizing haptic vibration feedback via electroencephalography Is ChatGPT like a nine-year-old child in theory of mind? Evidence from Chinese writing Analysing factors influencing undergraduates’ adoption of intelligent physical education systems using an expanded TAM The importance of aligning instructor age with learning content in designing instructional videos for older adults Evaluating classroom response systems in engineering education: Which metrics better reflect student performance?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1