The CNN Effect and South Korea’s Humanitarian Response to North Korea: A Media-Driven Policy?

IF 1.2 Q1 AREA STUDIES East Asia Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI:10.1007/s12140-024-09433-z
Shay Yeger, Guy Podoler
{"title":"The CNN Effect and South Korea’s Humanitarian Response to North Korea: A Media-Driven Policy?","authors":"Shay Yeger, Guy Podoler","doi":"10.1007/s12140-024-09433-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study explores the intersection of media and policy in inter-Korean relations, focusing on the impact of South Korean media on the government’s response to the North Korean famine. Examining the famine through the “CNN effect” and Robinson’s “policy-media interaction model,” we move beyond simplistic cause-and-effect narratives and assess the media’s potential to drive policy change in a unique context: a divided nation marked by both deep animosity and shared cultural ties. Our analysis reveals that the South Korean media predominantly conveyed informative narratives rather than emotional ones during the coverage of the North Korean famine. We argue that, consistent with the interaction model, the media primarily functioned to solidify societal consensus on humanitarian aid, rather than directly shaping government policy. Robinson’s framework supports this finding, suggesting that media influence diminishes when policy goals are clearly defined, as they were for South Korea’s response to the famine. However, this study also addresses the limitations of Robinson’s model, noting that it may oversimplify media behavior by neglecting crucial cultural, political, and historical factors. Ultimately, this study sheds light on the nuanced dynamics of media, policy, and inter-Korean relations in the face of a humanitarian crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":53913,"journal":{"name":"East Asia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-024-09433-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the intersection of media and policy in inter-Korean relations, focusing on the impact of South Korean media on the government’s response to the North Korean famine. Examining the famine through the “CNN effect” and Robinson’s “policy-media interaction model,” we move beyond simplistic cause-and-effect narratives and assess the media’s potential to drive policy change in a unique context: a divided nation marked by both deep animosity and shared cultural ties. Our analysis reveals that the South Korean media predominantly conveyed informative narratives rather than emotional ones during the coverage of the North Korean famine. We argue that, consistent with the interaction model, the media primarily functioned to solidify societal consensus on humanitarian aid, rather than directly shaping government policy. Robinson’s framework supports this finding, suggesting that media influence diminishes when policy goals are clearly defined, as they were for South Korea’s response to the famine. However, this study also addresses the limitations of Robinson’s model, noting that it may oversimplify media behavior by neglecting crucial cultural, political, and historical factors. Ultimately, this study sheds light on the nuanced dynamics of media, policy, and inter-Korean relations in the face of a humanitarian crisis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CNN 效应与韩国对朝鲜的人道主义反应:媒体驱动的政策?
本研究探讨了朝韩关系中媒体与政策的交集,重点关注韩国媒体对政府应对朝鲜饥荒的影响。通过 "CNN 效应 "和罗宾逊的 "政策-媒体互动模型 "对饥荒进行研究,我们超越了简单的因果关系叙事,评估了媒体在独特背景下推动政策变化的潜力:一个既有深仇大恨又有共同文化纽带的分裂国家。我们的分析表明,韩国媒体在报道朝鲜饥荒时主要传递信息叙事,而非情感叙事。我们认为,与互动模式一致,媒体的主要功能是巩固社会对人道主义援助的共识,而不是直接影响政府政策。罗宾逊的框架支持这一结论,认为当政策目标明确时,媒体的影响力就会减弱,韩国应对饥荒的政策目标就是如此。不过,本研究也探讨了罗宾逊模型的局限性,指出该模型可能忽略了关键的文化、政治和历史因素,从而过度简化了媒体行为。最终,本研究揭示了媒体、政策和朝韩关系在面对人道主义危机时的微妙动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
East Asia
East Asia AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: East Asia, formerly the Journal of Northeast Asian Studies, is the first journal to examine the interplay between politics and culture underlying major developments in China, Japan, Korea, and the Pacific Rim. It is distinguished by a unique, transnational approach to political, economic, and cultural issues. Focusing on the continuing influence these nations exert upon each other, this international quarterly examines the competition, assimilation, and tensions that now shape events in the region, and will for years to come.
期刊最新文献
The CNN Effect and South Korea’s Humanitarian Response to North Korea: A Media-Driven Policy? The Role of Vietnam in Resolving Regional Conflicts in Mainland Southeast Asia in the First Half of the Nineteenth Century Navigating the Persian Gulf Security Complex: Saudi-Iran Rapprochement in an Era of Great Power Competition Singapore’s Indo-Pacific Strategy: A Case of Principled Hedging Exploring Opportunities and Limitations of Kazakhstan’s Multilateral and Bilateral Cooperation in Renewable Energy within Central Asia: A Comprehensive Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1