Has a dedicated biodiversity offsets policy improved the environmental and social compensation outcomes of development in Australia?

IF 4.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environment, Development and Sustainability Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1007/s10668-024-05108-0
Linda J. Abdo, Sandy Griffin, Annabeth Kemp, Grey Coupland
{"title":"Has a dedicated biodiversity offsets policy improved the environmental and social compensation outcomes of development in Australia?","authors":"Linda J. Abdo, Sandy Griffin, Annabeth Kemp, Grey Coupland","doi":"10.1007/s10668-024-05108-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biodiversity offsets are used worldwide to provide environmental compensation for the impacts of development and to meet the goals of sustainable development. Australia has embraced the use of offsets and its offset methodologies have been used as models by other jurisdictions. However, the maturity of offset requirements in Australia is unknown. To understand this, development referrals submitted under the Australian <i>Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999</i> (Commonwealth) between October 2011 and September 2017 were reviewed to determine if offset requirements in Australia were improving in complexity, transparency and/or environmental outcomes (termed maturity) over time. Despite the implementation of dedicated policy in Australia in 2012, our analysis showed that offset requirements were not on a trajectory towards improvement (maturity) over the 6-year period examined. There was no evidence to suggest the type of offsets required and compensation for impacts to specific species and habitats increased in complexity over time. The level of detail included for offset requirements, mandatory commencement dates and requirements for ecological outcomes similarly did not increase over time. Consequently, dedicated legislation for offsets is recommended to remedy these omissions and enable effective functionality for biodiversity offsets through the protection of the environment and conservation of biodiversity, ecosystem function and ecosystem services.</p>","PeriodicalId":540,"journal":{"name":"Environment, Development and Sustainability","volume":"160 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment, Development and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05108-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biodiversity offsets are used worldwide to provide environmental compensation for the impacts of development and to meet the goals of sustainable development. Australia has embraced the use of offsets and its offset methodologies have been used as models by other jurisdictions. However, the maturity of offset requirements in Australia is unknown. To understand this, development referrals submitted under the Australian Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth) between October 2011 and September 2017 were reviewed to determine if offset requirements in Australia were improving in complexity, transparency and/or environmental outcomes (termed maturity) over time. Despite the implementation of dedicated policy in Australia in 2012, our analysis showed that offset requirements were not on a trajectory towards improvement (maturity) over the 6-year period examined. There was no evidence to suggest the type of offsets required and compensation for impacts to specific species and habitats increased in complexity over time. The level of detail included for offset requirements, mandatory commencement dates and requirements for ecological outcomes similarly did not increase over time. Consequently, dedicated legislation for offsets is recommended to remedy these omissions and enable effective functionality for biodiversity offsets through the protection of the environment and conservation of biodiversity, ecosystem function and ecosystem services.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专门的生物多样性补偿政策是否改善了澳大利亚发展的环境和社会补偿结果?
生物多样性抵消在全球范围内被用于为发展带来的影响提供环境补偿,并实现可持续发展的目标。澳大利亚已开始使用抵消,其抵消方法也被其他司法管辖区作为范例。然而,抵消要求在澳大利亚的成熟度尚不可知。为了了解这一点,我们对 2011 年 10 月至 2017 年 9 月期间根据《1999 年澳大利亚环境保护和生物多样性保护法》(联邦)提交的开发推荐进行了审查,以确定澳大利亚的抵消要求是否随着时间的推移在复杂性、透明度和/或环境成果(称为成熟度)方面有所改善。尽管澳大利亚于 2012 年实施了专门政策,但我们的分析表明,在审查的 6 年时间里,抵消要求并没有朝着改进(成熟)的方向发展。没有证据表明抵消要求的类型以及对特定物种和栖息地影响的补偿随着时间的推移而变得更加复杂。抵消要求、强制开始日期和生态结果要求的详细程度同样没有随着时间的推移而增加。因此,建议制定专门的抵消立法,以弥补这些遗漏,并通过保护环境、保护生物多样性、生态系统功能和生态系统服务,实现生物多样性抵消的有效功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environment, Development and Sustainability
Environment, Development and Sustainability Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
754
期刊介绍: Environment, Development and Sustainability is an international and multidisciplinary journal covering all aspects of the environmental impacts of socio-economic development. It is also concerned with the complex interactions which occur between development and environment, and its purpose is to seek ways and means for achieving sustainability in all human activities aimed at such development. The subject matter of the journal includes the following and related issues: -mutual interactions among society, development and environment, and their implications for sustainable development -technical, economic, ethical and philosophical aspects of sustainable development -global sustainability - the obstacles and ways in which they could be overcome -local and regional sustainability initiatives, their practical implementation, and relevance for use in a wider context -development and application of indicators of sustainability -development, verification, implementation and monitoring of policies for sustainable development -sustainable use of land, water, energy and biological resources in development -impacts of agriculture and forestry activities on soil and aquatic ecosystems and biodiversity -effects of energy use and global climate change on development and sustainability -impacts of population growth and human activities on food and other essential resources for development -role of national and international agencies, and of international aid and trade arrangements in sustainable development -social and cultural contexts of sustainable development -role of education and public awareness in sustainable development -role of political and economic instruments in sustainable development -shortcomings of sustainable development and its alternatives.
期刊最新文献
Research on the relationship between environmental governance pressure and green innovation Analyzing the effects of socioeconomic, natural and landscape factors on PM2.5 concentrations from a spatial perspective Addressing the contradiction between water supply and demand: a study on multi-objective regional water resources optimization allocation Development of single and dual crop coefficients for drip-irrigated broccoli using weighing type field lysimeters in semi-arid environment Energy transition policy, cash flow uncertainty and R&D expenditures of energy enterprises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1