Experimental and Statistical Analysis of Concrete Eco-Cobble Using Organic and Synthetic Fibers

IF 2.8 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Processes Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.3390/pr12091936
Ricardo Andrés García-León, Jorge Trigos-Caceres, Natalia Castilla-Quintero, Nelson Afanador-García, July Gómez-Camperos
{"title":"Experimental and Statistical Analysis of Concrete Eco-Cobble Using Organic and Synthetic Fibers","authors":"Ricardo Andrés García-León, Jorge Trigos-Caceres, Natalia Castilla-Quintero, Nelson Afanador-García, July Gómez-Camperos","doi":"10.3390/pr12091936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The environmental impact of traditional construction materials necessitates the development of sustainable alternatives. This study evaluates eco-cobbles as novel building materials designed to reduce environmental footprint while maintaining performance standards. The objectives were to develop an eco-friendly cobble alternative and assess its effectiveness through laboratory tests. Eco-cobbles were synthesized using recycled and bio-based materials and tested for compressive strength, flexural strength, and water absorption at 14 and 28 days. The compressive strength ranged from 11.5 MPa to 26.8 MPa, with a maximum value observed at 28 days in a mixture containing 95% concrete and 5% polyethylene terephthalate (PET). Flexural strength varied from 9.1 MPa to 28.7 MPa, with the highest value achieved in a mixture of 95% concrete and 0% fibers. Water absorption rates ranged from 2.1% to 6.6%, demonstrating an effective balance between performance and durability. Environmental assessments indicated a 30% reduction in resource consumption and a 40% decrease in carbon footprint compared to traditional cobble production methods. The findings demonstrate that eco-cobbles not only meet performance standards but also offer significant environmental benefits with a 99% compliance from the results obtained by response surface methodology plots, confirming that eco-cobbles offer a viable, sustainable alternative to conventional materials, with the potential for broader application in eco-friendly construction practices.","PeriodicalId":20597,"journal":{"name":"Processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Processes","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12091936","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The environmental impact of traditional construction materials necessitates the development of sustainable alternatives. This study evaluates eco-cobbles as novel building materials designed to reduce environmental footprint while maintaining performance standards. The objectives were to develop an eco-friendly cobble alternative and assess its effectiveness through laboratory tests. Eco-cobbles were synthesized using recycled and bio-based materials and tested for compressive strength, flexural strength, and water absorption at 14 and 28 days. The compressive strength ranged from 11.5 MPa to 26.8 MPa, with a maximum value observed at 28 days in a mixture containing 95% concrete and 5% polyethylene terephthalate (PET). Flexural strength varied from 9.1 MPa to 28.7 MPa, with the highest value achieved in a mixture of 95% concrete and 0% fibers. Water absorption rates ranged from 2.1% to 6.6%, demonstrating an effective balance between performance and durability. Environmental assessments indicated a 30% reduction in resource consumption and a 40% decrease in carbon footprint compared to traditional cobble production methods. The findings demonstrate that eco-cobbles not only meet performance standards but also offer significant environmental benefits with a 99% compliance from the results obtained by response surface methodology plots, confirming that eco-cobbles offer a viable, sustainable alternative to conventional materials, with the potential for broader application in eco-friendly construction practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用有机纤维和合成纤维的混凝土生态卵石的实验和统计分析
传统建筑材料对环境的影响要求开发可持续的替代品。本研究对生态鹅卵石作为新型建筑材料进行了评估,旨在减少对环境的影响,同时保持性能标准。目标是开发一种生态友好型鹅卵石替代品,并通过实验室测试评估其有效性。生态鹅卵石是用回收材料和生物基材料合成的,并在 14 天和 28 天时进行了抗压强度、抗弯强度和吸水性测试。抗压强度从 11.5 兆帕到 26.8 兆帕不等,在含有 95% 混凝土和 5% 聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯(PET)的混合物中,28 天时的抗压强度达到最大值。抗折强度从 9.1 兆帕到 28.7 兆帕不等,最高值出现在 95% 混凝土和 0% 纤维的混合物中。吸水率从 2.1% 到 6.6% 不等,显示了性能和耐久性之间的有效平衡。环境评估表明,与传统的鹅卵石生产方法相比,资源消耗减少了 30%,碳足迹减少了 40%。研究结果表明,生态鹅卵石不仅符合性能标准,还具有显著的环境效益,从响应面方法图中获得的结果来看,其符合率达到 99%,证实了生态鹅卵石是一种可行的、可持续的传统材料替代品,有望在生态友好型建筑实践中得到更广泛的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Processes
Processes Chemical Engineering-Bioengineering
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
11.40%
发文量
2239
审稿时长
14.11 days
期刊介绍: Processes (ISSN 2227-9717) provides an advanced forum for process related research in chemistry, biology and allied engineering fields. The journal publishes regular research papers, communications, letters, short notes and reviews. Our aim is to encourage researchers to publish their experimental, theoretical and computational results in as much detail as necessary. There is no restriction on paper length or number of figures and tables.
期刊最新文献
Box-Behnken Design for DPPH Free Radical Scavenging Activity Optimization from Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Polyphenolic Compounds from Agave lechuguilla Torr. Residues Particle Properties and Flotation Characteristics of Difficult-to-Float Lean Coal Damage Evaluation of Unconsolidated Sandstone Particle Migration Reservoir Based on Well–Seismic Combination Studying the Characteristics of Tank Oil Sludge Thermal Stability Improvement of Cu-Based Catalyst by Hydrophobic Modification in Methanol Synthesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1