Arthur Cerveira, Frederico Kremer, Darling de Andrade Lourenço, Ulisses B Corrêa
{"title":"Evaluation Framework for AI-driven Molecular Design of Multi-target Drugs: Brain Diseases as a Case Study","authors":"Arthur Cerveira, Frederico Kremer, Darling de Andrade Lourenço, Ulisses B Corrêa","doi":"arxiv-2408.10482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The widespread application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques has\nsignificantly influenced the development of new therapeutic agents. These\ncomputational methods can be used to design and predict the properties of\ngenerated molecules. Multi-target Drug Discovery (MTDD) is an emerging paradigm\nfor discovering drugs against complex disorders that do not respond well to\nmore traditional target-specific treatments, such as central nervous system,\nimmune system, and cardiovascular diseases. Still, there is yet to be an\nestablished benchmark suite for assessing the effectiveness of AI tools for\ndesigning multi-target compounds. Standardized benchmarks allow for comparing\nexisting techniques and promote rapid research progress. Hence, this work\nproposes an evaluation framework for molecule generation techniques in MTDD\nscenarios, considering brain diseases as a case study. Our methodology involves\nusing large language models to select the appropriate molecular targets,\ngathering and preprocessing the bioassay datasets, training quantitative\nstructure-activity relationship models to predict target modulation, and\nassessing other essential drug-likeness properties for implementing the\nbenchmarks. Additionally, this work will assess the performance of four deep\ngenerative models and evolutionary algorithms over our benchmark suite. In our\nfindings, both evolutionary algorithms and generative models can achieve\ncompetitive results across the proposed benchmarks.","PeriodicalId":501347,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Neural and Evolutionary Computing","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Neural and Evolutionary Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.10482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The widespread application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques has
significantly influenced the development of new therapeutic agents. These
computational methods can be used to design and predict the properties of
generated molecules. Multi-target Drug Discovery (MTDD) is an emerging paradigm
for discovering drugs against complex disorders that do not respond well to
more traditional target-specific treatments, such as central nervous system,
immune system, and cardiovascular diseases. Still, there is yet to be an
established benchmark suite for assessing the effectiveness of AI tools for
designing multi-target compounds. Standardized benchmarks allow for comparing
existing techniques and promote rapid research progress. Hence, this work
proposes an evaluation framework for molecule generation techniques in MTDD
scenarios, considering brain diseases as a case study. Our methodology involves
using large language models to select the appropriate molecular targets,
gathering and preprocessing the bioassay datasets, training quantitative
structure-activity relationship models to predict target modulation, and
assessing other essential drug-likeness properties for implementing the
benchmarks. Additionally, this work will assess the performance of four deep
generative models and evolutionary algorithms over our benchmark suite. In our
findings, both evolutionary algorithms and generative models can achieve
competitive results across the proposed benchmarks.