Good for the goose, bad for the gander? Corruption and income inequality

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Southern Economic Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1002/soej.12733
Jamie Bologna Pavlik, Justin T. Callais
{"title":"Good for the goose, bad for the gander? Corruption and income inequality","authors":"Jamie Bologna Pavlik, Justin T. Callais","doi":"10.1002/soej.12733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine the relationship between corruption and income inequality across countries. While previous studies have explored this association at both an international and within‐country level, we expand on this literature in two distinct ways. First, along with the most commonly utilized measure of inequality (Gini coefficients), we also examine income per‐capita at each decile, along with top 1% and 5%, and the associated income shares. Second, we employ an empirical strategy that differs from the existing literature. Our primary results are estimated using matching methods, but we also supplement these results with a “doubly robust” difference‐in‐difference design. We find that a reduction in corruption increases incomes of the top 80% but does not significantly impact incomes of the bottom 20%, or the top 1% and 5%. We find some evidence of income growth amongst the top 1% and 5% following increases in corruption, but these results are inconsistent across estimations. Our results also suggest that accounting for the size of the informal sector matters a great deal in understanding the relationship between corruption and the distribution of income.","PeriodicalId":47946,"journal":{"name":"Southern Economic Journal","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Economic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12733","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examine the relationship between corruption and income inequality across countries. While previous studies have explored this association at both an international and within‐country level, we expand on this literature in two distinct ways. First, along with the most commonly utilized measure of inequality (Gini coefficients), we also examine income per‐capita at each decile, along with top 1% and 5%, and the associated income shares. Second, we employ an empirical strategy that differs from the existing literature. Our primary results are estimated using matching methods, but we also supplement these results with a “doubly robust” difference‐in‐difference design. We find that a reduction in corruption increases incomes of the top 80% but does not significantly impact incomes of the bottom 20%, or the top 1% and 5%. We find some evidence of income growth amongst the top 1% and 5% following increases in corruption, but these results are inconsistent across estimations. Our results also suggest that accounting for the size of the informal sector matters a great deal in understanding the relationship between corruption and the distribution of income.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对鹅有利,对鹅有害?腐败与收入不平等
我们研究了腐败与各国收入不平等之间的关系。以往的研究从国际和国内两个层面探讨了这一关系,而我们则以两种不同的方式扩展了这一文献。首先,除了最常用的不平等衡量标准(基尼系数)外,我们还考察了每个十分位数的人均收入、最高的 1%和 5%,以及相关的收入份额。其次,我们采用了与现有文献不同的实证策略。我们的主要结果是通过匹配方法估算出来的,但我们也通过 "双重稳健 "差分设计对这些结果进行了补充。我们发现,腐败现象的减少增加了收入最高的 80% 的人的收入,但对收入最低的 20% 的人或收入最高的 1% 和 5% 的人的收入影响不大。我们发现一些证据表明,在腐败增加后,收入最高的 1%和 5%的人的收入会增加,但这些结果在不同的估计中并不一致。我们的结果还表明,考虑非正规部门的规模对理解腐败与收入分配之间的关系非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
58
期刊最新文献
Theme park rides are Giffen goods The fourth industrial revolution and the future of work: Reasons to worry and policies to consider Exploring the corruption‐inefficiency nexus using an endogenous stochastic frontier analysis How the Federal Reserve got so huge, and why and how it can shrink The case for nominal GDP level targeting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1