Ravi K Tripathi, Blaine Kenaa, Kimberly C Claeys, J Kristie Johnson, Meghana Patel, Jayne Atkinson, Mary E Maldarelli, Michelle Newman, Surbhi Leekha
{"title":"Improving Antibiotic Use for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Through Diagnostic Stewardship: A Proof-of-Concept Mixed-Methods Study","authors":"Ravi K Tripathi, Blaine Kenaa, Kimberly C Claeys, J Kristie Johnson, Meghana Patel, Jayne Atkinson, Mary E Maldarelli, Michelle Newman, Surbhi Leekha","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofae500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Overtreatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is driven by positive respiratory tract cultures in the absence of a clinical picture of pneumonia. We evaluated the potential for diagnostic stewardship at the respiratory culture reporting step. Methods In this mixed-methods study, we conducted a baseline evaluation of lower respiratory tract (LRT) culture appropriateness and antibiotic prescribing, followed by a non-randomized intervention in two adult ICUs. The intervention was a comment in the report to indicate potential colonization instead of organism identification when LRT cultures were inappropriate, i.e., not meeting criteria for pneumonia as adjudicated by a physician using a standard algorithm. Results At baseline, among 66 inappropriate LRT cultures, antibiotic treatment for VAP was more frequent with identification of potential pathogen(s) in the index culture compared to no growth/normal flora (16/35 (46%) vs 7/31 (23%), P=0.049). In the intervention period, 28 inappropriate cultures with growth of potential pathogen(s) underwent report modification. The proportion of episodes for which antibiotic therapy for VAP was completed was significantly lower in the intervention compared to baseline group (5/28 (18%) vs 16/35 (46%), P = 0.02). Conclusions Diagnostic stewardship for VAP could be facilitated by modification of LRT culture reporting guided by clinical features of pneumonia.","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae500","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background Overtreatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is driven by positive respiratory tract cultures in the absence of a clinical picture of pneumonia. We evaluated the potential for diagnostic stewardship at the respiratory culture reporting step. Methods In this mixed-methods study, we conducted a baseline evaluation of lower respiratory tract (LRT) culture appropriateness and antibiotic prescribing, followed by a non-randomized intervention in two adult ICUs. The intervention was a comment in the report to indicate potential colonization instead of organism identification when LRT cultures were inappropriate, i.e., not meeting criteria for pneumonia as adjudicated by a physician using a standard algorithm. Results At baseline, among 66 inappropriate LRT cultures, antibiotic treatment for VAP was more frequent with identification of potential pathogen(s) in the index culture compared to no growth/normal flora (16/35 (46%) vs 7/31 (23%), P=0.049). In the intervention period, 28 inappropriate cultures with growth of potential pathogen(s) underwent report modification. The proportion of episodes for which antibiotic therapy for VAP was completed was significantly lower in the intervention compared to baseline group (5/28 (18%) vs 16/35 (46%), P = 0.02). Conclusions Diagnostic stewardship for VAP could be facilitated by modification of LRT culture reporting guided by clinical features of pneumonia.
期刊介绍:
Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.