{"title":"Miscalibration of simulations: A comment on Luebbert and Pachter: 'Miscalibration of the honeybee odometer' arXiv:2405.12998v1","authors":"Geoffrey Willam Stuart","doi":"arxiv-2408.07713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this commentary I review the claim by Luebbert and Pachter\n(arXiv:2405.12998v1) that the reported R-Squared value in Srinivasan et al.\n(Science, 287(5454):851-853, 2000), describing the relationship between\ndistance to a food source and mean waggle duration of honeybee dances, was too\nhigh to be consistent with the reported means and standard deviations in the\nlatter study. There is one serious limitation of the simulations conducted by\nLuebbert and Pachter, and two flaws that compromise their findings. The\nreported R-squared value of Srinivasan. et al. is within the expected range, as\nfar as that can be determined given the limitations of the available data.","PeriodicalId":501219,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Other Quantitative Biology","volume":"393 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Other Quantitative Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.07713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this commentary I review the claim by Luebbert and Pachter
(arXiv:2405.12998v1) that the reported R-Squared value in Srinivasan et al.
(Science, 287(5454):851-853, 2000), describing the relationship between
distance to a food source and mean waggle duration of honeybee dances, was too
high to be consistent with the reported means and standard deviations in the
latter study. There is one serious limitation of the simulations conducted by
Luebbert and Pachter, and two flaws that compromise their findings. The
reported R-squared value of Srinivasan. et al. is within the expected range, as
far as that can be determined given the limitations of the available data.