Acceptable finger pointing: How evaluators judge the ethicality of blame shifting

IF 3.4 3区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT European Management Review Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1111/emre.12678
Paolo Antonetti, Ilaria Baghi
{"title":"Acceptable finger pointing: How evaluators judge the ethicality of blame shifting","authors":"Paolo Antonetti, Ilaria Baghi","doi":"10.1111/emre.12678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research shows how blame shifting deemed unethical by evaluators leads to a damaging reputational backlash. Yet, scholars have not determined how evaluators judge if blame‐shifting messages are ethical. To fill this gap, we develop a conceptual model of evaluators' judgments of blame‐shifting ethicality, integrating insights from ethical decision‐making and the ethics of blame. The ethical evaluation of blame shifting is based on perceptions of target blameworthiness, the motives of the blamer, and message fairness. These three perceptions explain the evaluators' judgment of whether blame shifting is ethical. Furthermore, the model explains why at times evaluators fail to develop a detailed ethical evaluation of the message. Organizational blame shifting in these circumstances can be effective and yet unethical because evaluators do not cognitively process the relevant ethical factors. This article contributes to research on blame shifting by explaining how evaluators judge ethicality and examining the conditions for ethical blame shifting.","PeriodicalId":47372,"journal":{"name":"European Management Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12678","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research shows how blame shifting deemed unethical by evaluators leads to a damaging reputational backlash. Yet, scholars have not determined how evaluators judge if blame‐shifting messages are ethical. To fill this gap, we develop a conceptual model of evaluators' judgments of blame‐shifting ethicality, integrating insights from ethical decision‐making and the ethics of blame. The ethical evaluation of blame shifting is based on perceptions of target blameworthiness, the motives of the blamer, and message fairness. These three perceptions explain the evaluators' judgment of whether blame shifting is ethical. Furthermore, the model explains why at times evaluators fail to develop a detailed ethical evaluation of the message. Organizational blame shifting in these circumstances can be effective and yet unethical because evaluators do not cognitively process the relevant ethical factors. This article contributes to research on blame shifting by explaining how evaluators judge ethicality and examining the conditions for ethical blame shifting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可接受的指责:评估人员如何判断推卸责任的道德性
研究表明,评估人员认为不道德的推卸责任行为会导致声誉受损。然而,学者们尚未确定评估人员如何判断推卸责任的信息是否合乎道德。为了填补这一空白,我们结合伦理决策和推卸责任伦理的观点,建立了一个评估者判断推卸责任是否合乎伦理的概念模型。对推卸责任的道德评价是基于对目标责任感、推卸责任者的动机和信息公平性的认知。这三种认知解释了评价者对推卸责任是否合乎道德的判断。此外,该模型还解释了为什么评价者有时无法对信息进行详细的道德评价。在这种情况下,组织推卸责任可能是有效的,但也可能是不道德的,因为评价者没有对相关的道德因素进行认知处理。本文通过解释评价者如何判断道德性以及研究道德性推卸责任的条件,为有关推卸责任的研究做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The European Management Review is an international journal dedicated to advancing the understanding of management in private and public sector organizations through empirical investigation and theoretical analysis. The European Management Review provides an international forum for dialogue between researchers, thereby improving the understanding of the nature of management in different settings and promoting the transfer of research results to management practice. Although one of the European Management Review"s aims is to foster the general advancement of management scholarship among European scholars and/or those academics interested in European management issues.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Acceptable finger pointing: How evaluators judge the ethicality of blame shifting Human resource management in the emerging work ecosystem: Propositions for scholarship and implications for practice The effect of restructuring internationalized companies on performance: Evidence from European firms An artful workplace of the future: The role of art‐based interventions in fostering levers for creativity amongst a diverse workforce
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1