A meta‐analysis of person‐centered care interventions for improving health outcomes in persons living with dementia

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1111/wvn.12746
Ita Daryanti Saragih, Ira Suarilah, Ice Septriani Saragih, Lihui Pu, Carolyn M. Porta, Helinida Saragih, Yen‐Ko Lin, Chia‐Ju Lin
{"title":"A meta‐analysis of person‐centered care interventions for improving health outcomes in persons living with dementia","authors":"Ita Daryanti Saragih, Ira Suarilah, Ice Septriani Saragih, Lihui Pu, Carolyn M. Porta, Helinida Saragih, Yen‐Ko Lin, Chia‐Ju Lin","doi":"10.1111/wvn.12746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundPerson‐centered care emphasizes the importance of valuing and supporting the humanness of a person living with dementia as compared to focusing heavily on disease symptom management and treatment. The state of the evidence and outcomes from person‐centered care is unclear and is an important knowledge gap to address informed evidence‐based care for persons living with dementia.AimsTo synthesize the evidence on the efficacy of person‐centered care in improving health outcomes in people living with dementia.MethodsOur search using the following databases: Academic Search Complete, CINAHL, COCHRANE library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Google Scholar. The methodology quality of the included studies was assessed using a revised Cochrane risk‐of‐bias tool for randomized trials. Meta‐analyses were performed using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model to investigate the effectiveness of person‐centered care on improving health outcomes in persons living with dementia.ResultsSeventeen trials were included in this systematic review and meta‐analysis. Person‐centered care implementation was found to improve cognitive function (pooled SMD: 0.22; 9CRD420223808975% CI [0.04, 0.41], <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = .02) in persons living with dementia, although outcomes including the impact of the care model on activities of daily living, agitation, depression, and quality of life remain inconclusive.Linking Evidence to ActionPerson‐centered care improves the cognitive function of persons living with dementia, which is clinically meaningful and should not be ignored or overlooked in delivering evidence‐based care to this population. The findings of this study emphasize the importance of person‐centered care implementation among people living with dementia as an approach in improving health outcomes particularly on cognitive function improvement. Person‐centered care emphasizes the personhood of individuals living with dementia while respecting their needs, values, and beliefs and is identified as a preferred model of delivering dementia care in all settings as a non‐pharmacological approach.","PeriodicalId":49355,"journal":{"name":"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12746","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundPerson‐centered care emphasizes the importance of valuing and supporting the humanness of a person living with dementia as compared to focusing heavily on disease symptom management and treatment. The state of the evidence and outcomes from person‐centered care is unclear and is an important knowledge gap to address informed evidence‐based care for persons living with dementia.AimsTo synthesize the evidence on the efficacy of person‐centered care in improving health outcomes in people living with dementia.MethodsOur search using the following databases: Academic Search Complete, CINAHL, COCHRANE library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Google Scholar. The methodology quality of the included studies was assessed using a revised Cochrane risk‐of‐bias tool for randomized trials. Meta‐analyses were performed using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model to investigate the effectiveness of person‐centered care on improving health outcomes in persons living with dementia.ResultsSeventeen trials were included in this systematic review and meta‐analysis. Person‐centered care implementation was found to improve cognitive function (pooled SMD: 0.22; 9CRD420223808975% CI [0.04, 0.41], p = .02) in persons living with dementia, although outcomes including the impact of the care model on activities of daily living, agitation, depression, and quality of life remain inconclusive.Linking Evidence to ActionPerson‐centered care improves the cognitive function of persons living with dementia, which is clinically meaningful and should not be ignored or overlooked in delivering evidence‐based care to this population. The findings of this study emphasize the importance of person‐centered care implementation among people living with dementia as an approach in improving health outcomes particularly on cognitive function improvement. Person‐centered care emphasizes the personhood of individuals living with dementia while respecting their needs, values, and beliefs and is identified as a preferred model of delivering dementia care in all settings as a non‐pharmacological approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对改善痴呆症患者健康状况的以人为本的护理干预措施进行荟萃分析
背景以人为本的护理强调重视和支持痴呆症患者的人性,而不是过分关注疾病症状的管理和治疗。以人为本的护理的证据和结果尚不明确,是为痴呆症患者提供知情循证护理的一个重要知识缺口。目的综合以人为本的护理在改善痴呆症患者健康状况方面的功效的证据。方法我们使用以下数据库进行了检索:我们使用以下数据库进行了检索:Academic Search Complete、CINAHL、COCHRANE library、EMBASE、MEDLINE、PubMed 和 Google Scholar。采用修订版 Cochrane 随机试验偏倚风险工具对纳入研究的方法学质量进行评估。采用 DerSimonian 和 Laird 随机效应模型进行了元分析,以研究以人为中心的护理对改善痴呆症患者健康状况的有效性。研究发现,实施以人为本的护理可改善痴呆症患者的认知功能(汇总SMD:0.22;9CRD420223808975% CI [0.04,0.41],p = .02),但护理模式对日常生活活动、躁动、抑郁和生活质量的影响等结果仍无定论。将证据与行动联系起来以人为本的护理能改善痴呆症患者的认知功能,这在临床上很有意义,在为这一人群提供循证护理时不应被忽视或忽略。这项研究的结果强调了在痴呆症患者中实施以人为本的护理的重要性,它是改善健康状况,尤其是改善认知功能的一种方法。以人为本的护理强调痴呆症患者的人格,同时尊重他们的需求、价值观和信仰,被认为是在所有环境中提供痴呆症护理的首选模式,是一种非药物护理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.60%
发文量
72
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The leading nursing society that has brought you the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is pleased to bring you Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. Now publishing 6 issues per year, this peer-reviewed journal and top information resource from The Honor Society of Nursing, Sigma Theta Tau International, uniquely bridges knowledge and application, taking a global approach in its presentation of research, policy and practice, education and management, and its link to action in real world settings. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing is written especially for: Clinicians Researchers Nurse leaders Managers Administrators Educators Policymakers Worldviews on Evidence­-Based Nursing is a primary source of information for using evidence-based nursing practice to improve patient care by featuring: Knowledge synthesis articles with best practice applications and recommendations for linking evidence to action in real world practice, administra-tive, education and policy settings Original articles and features that present large-scale studies, which challenge and develop the knowledge base about evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare Special features and columns with information geared to readers’ diverse roles: clinical practice, education, research, policy and administration/leadership Commentaries about current evidence-based practice issues and developments A forum that encourages readers to engage in an ongoing dialogue on critical issues and questions in evidence-based nursing Reviews of the latest publications and resources on evidence-based nursing and healthcare News about professional organizations, conferences and other activities around the world related to evidence-based nursing Links to other global evidence-based nursing resources and organizations.
期刊最新文献
Effect of a Nurse-Led Support Program Using Mobile Application Versus Nurse Phone Advice on Patients at Risk of Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Efficacy of Supportive Care Interventions for Improving Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms and Resilience in Family Caregivers of Cancer-Affected Children: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Effectiveness of meaning-centered interventions on existential distress and mental health outcomes in cancer survivors and their family caregivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Comparing the effectiveness of peer-led healthy aging interventions on depression and quality of life in community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Effects of theory-guided unsupervised exercise on depression, sleep quality, and sense of control in pregnant women: A randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1