Efficacy of Supportive Care Interventions for Improving Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms and Resilience in Family Caregivers of Cancer-Affected Children: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Qianwen Yan, Xia Li, Yang Chen, Linna Li, Xiaolin Hu
{"title":"Efficacy of Supportive Care Interventions for Improving Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms and Resilience in Family Caregivers of Cancer-Affected Children: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Qianwen Yan, Xia Li, Yang Chen, Linna Li, Xiaolin Hu","doi":"10.1111/wvn.12764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The diagnosis of pediatric cancer is a major shock to family caregivers, and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSSs) emerge as the most prevalent adverse psychological outcomes. However, not all family caregivers have sufficient resilience to cope with these challenges; thus, supportive care interventions are necessary. These interventions, which include psychosocial support, education, and other forms of assistance, are designed to enhance the well-being of those affected by disease. In the past few years, more research has been delving into supportive care interventions for family caregivers of cancer-affected children, yet there is still a variance in the results.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the impacts of supportive care interventions on PTSSs and resilience in family caregivers of cancer-affected children, also focusing on the impacts of prerecruitment time to diagnosis, duration, type of intervention, and recruitment area on the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine databases (Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Embase, CNKI, Sinomed, WANFANG, VIP, and Web of Science) were searched from their inception to February 21, 2024. The revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method were used to evaluate the quality of evidence. To gauge the effectiveness of the interventions, we computed the standard mean difference (SMD) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) utilizing StataCorp (version 16.0). Sensitivity analysis and Egger's test were also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Supportive care interventions significantly improved the PTSSs (SMD = -0.86, 95% CI [-1.39, -0.33], p < 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 94.95%) and resilience (SMD = 0.85, 95% CI [0.26, 1.44], p < 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 88.3%) among family caregivers of cancer-affected children. Subgroup analyses revealed that early interventions for family caregivers after the diagnosis of children and the short-term interventions were associated with improvements in their PTSS and resilience. Moreover, cognitive behavioral interventions were the most common type of interventions and were effective in supporting family caregivers. Additionally, supportive care interventions did not improve PTSSs among family caregivers in middle-income countries.</p><p><strong>Linking evidence to action: </strong>Supportive care interventions have demonstrated efficacy in improving PTSSs and resilience among family caregivers of cancer-affected children. This research proved the imperative of providing prompt supportive care to family caregivers early after the pediatric cancer diagnosis. Additionally, it is also necessary to further study and explore the optimal way to combine different intervention components based on caregivers' need and to develop regionally adapted and culturally sensitive supportive care interventions to better improve health outcomes for family caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":49355,"journal":{"name":"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing","volume":"22 1","pages":"e12764"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12764","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The diagnosis of pediatric cancer is a major shock to family caregivers, and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSSs) emerge as the most prevalent adverse psychological outcomes. However, not all family caregivers have sufficient resilience to cope with these challenges; thus, supportive care interventions are necessary. These interventions, which include psychosocial support, education, and other forms of assistance, are designed to enhance the well-being of those affected by disease. In the past few years, more research has been delving into supportive care interventions for family caregivers of cancer-affected children, yet there is still a variance in the results.
Objective: To investigate the impacts of supportive care interventions on PTSSs and resilience in family caregivers of cancer-affected children, also focusing on the impacts of prerecruitment time to diagnosis, duration, type of intervention, and recruitment area on the outcomes.
Methods: Nine databases (Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Embase, CNKI, Sinomed, WANFANG, VIP, and Web of Science) were searched from their inception to February 21, 2024. The revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method were used to evaluate the quality of evidence. To gauge the effectiveness of the interventions, we computed the standard mean difference (SMD) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) utilizing StataCorp (version 16.0). Sensitivity analysis and Egger's test were also conducted.
Results: Supportive care interventions significantly improved the PTSSs (SMD = -0.86, 95% CI [-1.39, -0.33], p < 0.01, I2 = 94.95%) and resilience (SMD = 0.85, 95% CI [0.26, 1.44], p < 0.01, I2 = 88.3%) among family caregivers of cancer-affected children. Subgroup analyses revealed that early interventions for family caregivers after the diagnosis of children and the short-term interventions were associated with improvements in their PTSS and resilience. Moreover, cognitive behavioral interventions were the most common type of interventions and were effective in supporting family caregivers. Additionally, supportive care interventions did not improve PTSSs among family caregivers in middle-income countries.
Linking evidence to action: Supportive care interventions have demonstrated efficacy in improving PTSSs and resilience among family caregivers of cancer-affected children. This research proved the imperative of providing prompt supportive care to family caregivers early after the pediatric cancer diagnosis. Additionally, it is also necessary to further study and explore the optimal way to combine different intervention components based on caregivers' need and to develop regionally adapted and culturally sensitive supportive care interventions to better improve health outcomes for family caregivers.
背景:儿童癌症的诊断对家庭照顾者来说是一个重大的冲击,创伤后应激症状(ptsd)是最普遍的不良心理结果。然而,并非所有家庭照顾者都有足够的弹性来应对这些挑战;因此,支持性护理干预是必要的。这些干预措施包括心理社会支持、教育和其他形式的援助,旨在增进受疾病影响者的福祉。在过去的几年里,更多的研究一直在深入研究癌症患儿的家庭照顾者的支持性护理干预措施,但结果仍然存在差异。目的:探讨支持性护理干预对癌症患儿家庭照顾者创伤后应激障碍和心理弹性的影响,并研究介入前诊断时间、干预持续时间、干预类型和介入地区等因素对结果的影响。方法:检索Cochrane Library、Ovid MEDLINE、CINAHL Plus with Full Text、Embase、CNKI、Sinomed、万方、VIP、Web of Science等9个数据库,检索时间为数据库成立至2024年2月21日。采用修订后的Cochrane偏倚风险工具和分级推荐评估、发展和评价(GRADE)方法评估证据质量。为了衡量干预措施的有效性,我们使用StataCorp(版本16.0)计算标准平均差(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI)。并进行敏感性分析和Egger’s检验。结果:支持性护理干预显著改善了癌症患儿家庭照顾者的ptsd (SMD = -0.86, 95% CI [-1.39, -0.33], p 2 = 94.95%)和心理韧性(SMD = 0.85, 95% CI [0.26, 1.44], p 2 = 88.3%)。亚组分析显示,在儿童诊断后对家庭照顾者进行早期干预和短期干预与他们的创伤后应激障碍和恢复力的改善有关。此外,认知行为干预是最常见的干预类型,在支持家庭照顾者方面是有效的。此外,在中等收入国家,支持性护理干预并不能改善家庭照顾者的ptsd。将证据与行动联系起来:支持性护理干预在改善癌症患儿家庭照顾者的创伤后应激障碍和恢复力方面已被证明有效。这项研究证明了在儿童癌症诊断后早期为家庭护理人员提供及时支持性护理的必要性。此外,还需要进一步研究和探索基于照顾者需求的不同干预成分组合的最佳方式,并开发适合地区和文化敏感的支持性护理干预措施,以更好地改善家庭照顾者的健康结果。
期刊介绍:
The leading nursing society that has brought you the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is pleased to bring you Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. Now publishing 6 issues per year, this peer-reviewed journal and top information resource from The Honor Society of Nursing, Sigma Theta Tau International, uniquely bridges knowledge and application, taking a global approach in its presentation of research, policy and practice, education and management, and its link to action in real world settings.
Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing is written especially for:
Clinicians
Researchers
Nurse leaders
Managers
Administrators
Educators
Policymakers
Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing is a primary source of information for using evidence-based nursing practice to improve patient care by featuring:
Knowledge synthesis articles with best practice applications and recommendations for linking evidence to action in real world practice, administra-tive, education and policy settings
Original articles and features that present large-scale studies, which challenge and develop the knowledge base about evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare
Special features and columns with information geared to readers’ diverse roles: clinical practice, education, research, policy and administration/leadership
Commentaries about current evidence-based practice issues and developments
A forum that encourages readers to engage in an ongoing dialogue on critical issues and questions in evidence-based nursing
Reviews of the latest publications and resources on evidence-based nursing and healthcare
News about professional organizations, conferences and other activities around the world related to evidence-based nursing
Links to other global evidence-based nursing resources and organizations.