Analysis of more than 400,000 women provides case-control evidence for BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant classification

Maria Zanti, Denise G. O’Mahony, Michael T. Parsons, Leila Dorling, Joe Dennis, Nicholas J. Boddicker, Wenan Chen, Chunling Hu, Marc Naven, Kristia Yiangou, Thomas U. Ahearn, Christine B. Ambrosone, Irene L. Andrulis, Antonis C. Antoniou, Paul L. Auer, Caroline Baynes, Clara Bodelon, Natalia V. Bogdanova, Stig E. Bojesen, Manjeet K. Bolla, Kristen D. Brantley, Nicola J. Camp, Archie Campbell, Jose E. Castelao, Melissa H. Cessna, Jenny Chang-Claude, Fei Chen, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, NBCS Collaborators, Don M. Conroy, Kamila Czene, Arcangela De Nicolo, Susan M. Domchek, Thilo Dörk, Alison M. Dunning, A. Heather Eliassen, D. Gareth Evans, Peter A. Fasching, Jonine D. Figueroa, Henrik Flyger, Manuela Gago-Dominguez, Montserrat García-Closas, Gord Glendon, Anna González-Neira, Felix Grassmann, Andreas Hadjisavvas, Christopher A. Haiman, Ute Hamann, Steven N. Hart, Mikael B.A. Hartman, Weang-Kee Ho, James M. Hodge, Reiner Hoppe, Sacha J. Howell, kConFab Investigators, Anna Jakubowska, Elza K. Khusnutdinova, Yon-Dschun Ko, Peter Kraft, Vessela N. Kristensen, James V. Lacey, Jingmei Li, Geok Hoon Lim, Sara Lindström, Artitaya Lophatananon, Craig Luccarini, Arto Mannermaa, Maria Elena Martinez, Dimitrios Mavroudis, Roger L. Milne, Kenneth Muir, Katherine L. Nathanson, Rocio Nuñez-Torres, Nadia Obi, Janet E. Olson, Julie R. Palmer, Mihalis I. Panayiotidis, Alpa V. Patel, Paul D.P. Pharoah, Eric C. Polley, Muhammad U. Rashid, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Emmanouil Saloustros, Elinor J. Sawyer, Marjanka K. Schmidt, Melissa C. Southey, Veronique Kiak-Mien Tan, Soo Hwang Teo, Lauren R. Teras, Diana Torres, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Thérèse Truong, Celine M. Vachon, Qin Wang, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Siddhartha Yadav, Song Yao, Gary R. Zirpoli, Melissa S. Cline, Peter Devilee, Sean V. Tavtigian, David E. Goldgar, Fergus J. Couch, Douglas F. Easton, Amanda B. Spurdle, Kyriaki Michailidou
{"title":"Analysis of more than 400,000 women provides case-control evidence for BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant classification","authors":"Maria Zanti, Denise G. O’Mahony, Michael T. Parsons, Leila Dorling, Joe Dennis, Nicholas J. Boddicker, Wenan Chen, Chunling Hu, Marc Naven, Kristia Yiangou, Thomas U. Ahearn, Christine B. Ambrosone, Irene L. Andrulis, Antonis C. Antoniou, Paul L. Auer, Caroline Baynes, Clara Bodelon, Natalia V. Bogdanova, Stig E. Bojesen, Manjeet K. Bolla, Kristen D. Brantley, Nicola J. Camp, Archie Campbell, Jose E. Castelao, Melissa H. Cessna, Jenny Chang-Claude, Fei Chen, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, NBCS Collaborators, Don M. Conroy, Kamila Czene, Arcangela De Nicolo, Susan M. Domchek, Thilo Dörk, Alison M. Dunning, A. Heather Eliassen, D. Gareth Evans, Peter A. Fasching, Jonine D. Figueroa, Henrik Flyger, Manuela Gago-Dominguez, Montserrat García-Closas, Gord Glendon, Anna González-Neira, Felix Grassmann, Andreas Hadjisavvas, Christopher A. Haiman, Ute Hamann, Steven N. Hart, Mikael B.A. Hartman, Weang-Kee Ho, James M. Hodge, Reiner Hoppe, Sacha J. Howell, kConFab Investigators, Anna Jakubowska, Elza K. Khusnutdinova, Yon-Dschun Ko, Peter Kraft, Vessela N. Kristensen, James V. Lacey, Jingmei Li, Geok Hoon Lim, Sara Lindström, Artitaya Lophatananon, Craig Luccarini, Arto Mannermaa, Maria Elena Martinez, Dimitrios Mavroudis, Roger L. Milne, Kenneth Muir, Katherine L. Nathanson, Rocio Nuñez-Torres, Nadia Obi, Janet E. Olson, Julie R. Palmer, Mihalis I. Panayiotidis, Alpa V. Patel, Paul D.P. Pharoah, Eric C. Polley, Muhammad U. Rashid, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Emmanouil Saloustros, Elinor J. Sawyer, Marjanka K. Schmidt, Melissa C. Southey, Veronique Kiak-Mien Tan, Soo Hwang Teo, Lauren R. Teras, Diana Torres, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Thérèse Truong, Celine M. Vachon, Qin Wang, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Siddhartha Yadav, Song Yao, Gary R. Zirpoli, Melissa S. Cline, Peter Devilee, Sean V. Tavtigian, David E. Goldgar, Fergus J. Couch, Douglas F. Easton, Amanda B. Spurdle, Kyriaki Michailidou","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.04.24313051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical genetic testing identifies variants causal for hereditary cancer, information that is used for risk assessment and clinical management. Unfortunately, some variants identified are of uncertain clinical significance (VUS), complicating patient management. Case-control data is one evidence type used to classify VUS, and previous findings indicate that case-control likelihood ratios (LRs) outperform odds ratios for variant classification. As an initiative of the Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) Analytical Working Group we analyzed germline sequencing data of <em>BRCA1</em> and <em>BRCA2</em> from 96,691 female breast cancer cases and 303,925 unaffected controls from three studies: the BRIDGES study of the Breast Cancer Association Consortium, the Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility consortium, and the UK Biobank. We observed 11,227 <em>BRCA1</em> and <em>BRCA2</em> variants, with 6,921 being coding, covering 23.4% of <em>BRCA1</em> and <em>BRCA2</em> VUS in ClinVar and 19.2% of ClinVar curated (likely) benign or pathogenic variants. Case-control LR evidence was highly consistent with ClinVar assertions for (likely) benign or pathogenic variants; exhibiting 99.1% sensitivity and 95.4% specificity for <em>BRCA1</em> and 92.2% sensitivity and 86.6% specificity for <em>BRCA2</em>. This approach provides case-control evidence for 785 unclassified variants, that can serve as a valuable element for clinical classification.","PeriodicalId":501375,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Genetic and Genomic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Genetic and Genomic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.04.24313051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical genetic testing identifies variants causal for hereditary cancer, information that is used for risk assessment and clinical management. Unfortunately, some variants identified are of uncertain clinical significance (VUS), complicating patient management. Case-control data is one evidence type used to classify VUS, and previous findings indicate that case-control likelihood ratios (LRs) outperform odds ratios for variant classification. As an initiative of the Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) Analytical Working Group we analyzed germline sequencing data of BRCA1 and BRCA2 from 96,691 female breast cancer cases and 303,925 unaffected controls from three studies: the BRIDGES study of the Breast Cancer Association Consortium, the Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility consortium, and the UK Biobank. We observed 11,227 BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants, with 6,921 being coding, covering 23.4% of BRCA1 and BRCA2 VUS in ClinVar and 19.2% of ClinVar curated (likely) benign or pathogenic variants. Case-control LR evidence was highly consistent with ClinVar assertions for (likely) benign or pathogenic variants; exhibiting 99.1% sensitivity and 95.4% specificity for BRCA1 and 92.2% sensitivity and 86.6% specificity for BRCA2. This approach provides case-control evidence for 785 unclassified variants, that can serve as a valuable element for clinical classification.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对 40 多万名妇女的分析为 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 变体分类提供了病例对照证据
临床基因检测可确定与遗传性癌症有关的变异,这些信息可用于风险评估和临床管理。遗憾的是,有些被鉴定出的变异具有不确定的临床意义(VUS),从而使患者管理复杂化。病例对照数据是用于对 VUS 进行分类的一种证据类型,以往的研究结果表明,病例对照似然比 (LR) 优于用于变异体分类的几率比。作为基于证据的种系突变体等位基因解读网络(ENIGMA)分析工作组的一项倡议,我们分析了三项研究中 96,691 例女性乳腺癌病例和 303,925 例未受影响对照的 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 的种系测序数据,这三项研究是:乳腺癌协会联合会的 BRIDGES 研究、与易感性相关的癌症风险估计联合会和英国生物库。我们观察到了 11,227 个 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 变异,其中 6,921 个是编码变异,涵盖了 ClinVar 中 23.4% 的 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 VUS 变异和 19.2% 的 ClinVar 策划的(可能)良性或致病变异。病例对照 LR 证据与 ClinVar 对(可能)良性或致病变异的断言高度一致;对 BRCA1 的灵敏度为 99.1%,特异性为 95.4%;对 BRCA2 的灵敏度为 92.2%,特异性为 86.6%。这种方法为 785 个未分类变异提供了病例对照证据,可作为临床分类的重要依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Identifying individuals at risk for surgical supravalvar aortic stenosis by polygenic risk score with graded phenotyping Exome wide association study for blood lipids in 1,158,017 individuals from diverse populations Allelic effects on KLHL17 expression likely mediated by JunB/D underlie a PDAC GWAS signal at chr1p36.33 Genetic associations between SGLT2 inhibition, DPP4 inhibition or GLP1R agonism and prostate cancer risk: a two-sample Mendelian randomisation study A Genome-wide Association Study Identifies Novel Genetic Variants Associated with Knee Pain in the UK Biobank (N = 441,757)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1