Identifying individuals at risk for surgical supravalvar aortic stenosis by polygenic risk score with graded phenotyping

Delong Liu, Carolyn Beth Mervis, Mark Levin, Elisa Biamino, Maria Francesca Bedeschi, Maria Cristina Digilio, Gabriella Maria Squeo, Roberta Villa, Neelam Raja, Joy Lynne Freeman, Sharon Osgood, Giuseppe Merla, Amy Roberts, Colleen Morris, Lucy R Osborne, Beth Kozel
{"title":"Identifying individuals at risk for surgical supravalvar aortic stenosis by polygenic risk score with graded phenotyping","authors":"Delong Liu, Carolyn Beth Mervis, Mark Levin, Elisa Biamino, Maria Francesca Bedeschi, Maria Cristina Digilio, Gabriella Maria Squeo, Roberta Villa, Neelam Raja, Joy Lynne Freeman, Sharon Osgood, Giuseppe Merla, Amy Roberts, Colleen Morris, Lucy R Osborne, Beth Kozel","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.17.24313555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a previous pathway-based, extreme phenotype study, we identified 1064 variants associated with supravalvar aortic stenosis (SVAS) severity in people with Williams syndrome (WS) and either no SVAS or surgical SVAS. Here, we use those variants to develop and test polygenic risk scores (PRS). We used the clumping and thresholding (CT) approach on the full 1064 variants and a 427-variant subset that was part of 13 biologically relevant pathways identified in the previous study. We also used a lasso approach on the full set. We were able to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of >0.99 for the two CT PRS methods, using only 622 and 320 variants respectively when 2/3 of the initial 217 participants data were used for training and 1/3 for testing. The lasso performed less well. We then evaluated the performance of those PRS variant sets on an additional group of 138 patients with WS with intermediate severity SVAS and found a misclassification rate of <10% between the surgical and intermediate groups, suggesting potential for clinical utility of the score.","PeriodicalId":501375,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Genetic and Genomic Medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Genetic and Genomic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.17.24313555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a previous pathway-based, extreme phenotype study, we identified 1064 variants associated with supravalvar aortic stenosis (SVAS) severity in people with Williams syndrome (WS) and either no SVAS or surgical SVAS. Here, we use those variants to develop and test polygenic risk scores (PRS). We used the clumping and thresholding (CT) approach on the full 1064 variants and a 427-variant subset that was part of 13 biologically relevant pathways identified in the previous study. We also used a lasso approach on the full set. We were able to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of >0.99 for the two CT PRS methods, using only 622 and 320 variants respectively when 2/3 of the initial 217 participants data were used for training and 1/3 for testing. The lasso performed less well. We then evaluated the performance of those PRS variant sets on an additional group of 138 patients with WS with intermediate severity SVAS and found a misclassification rate of <10% between the surgical and intermediate groups, suggesting potential for clinical utility of the score.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过多基因风险评分和分级表型确定主动脉瓣上狭窄手术风险个体
在之前的一项基于路径的极端表型研究中,我们发现了 1064 个与威廉姆斯综合征(WS)患者主动脉瓣上狭窄(SVAS)严重程度相关的变体,这些变体要么没有 SVAS,要么接受过 SVAS 手术。在此,我们利用这些变异来开发和测试多基因风险评分(PRS)。我们对全部 1064 个变异体和 427 个变异体子集使用了聚类和阈值(CT)方法,这些变异体是先前研究中发现的 13 条生物相关路径的一部分。我们还对全部变异集使用了套索法。当初始的 217 名参与者数据的 2/3 用于训练,1/3 用于测试时,我们只分别使用了 622 个和 320 个变异体,两种 CT PRS 方法的曲线下面积(AUC)就达到了 0.99。套索法的表现较差。然后,我们在另外 138 名中等严重程度 SVAS 的 WS 患者身上评估了这些 PRS 变体集的性能,发现手术组和中等组之间的误分类率为 <10%,这表明该评分具有潜在的临床实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Identifying individuals at risk for surgical supravalvar aortic stenosis by polygenic risk score with graded phenotyping Exome wide association study for blood lipids in 1,158,017 individuals from diverse populations Allelic effects on KLHL17 expression likely mediated by JunB/D underlie a PDAC GWAS signal at chr1p36.33 Genetic associations between SGLT2 inhibition, DPP4 inhibition or GLP1R agonism and prostate cancer risk: a two-sample Mendelian randomisation study A Genome-wide Association Study Identifies Novel Genetic Variants Associated with Knee Pain in the UK Biobank (N = 441,757)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1