Evaluation of Non-Technical Skills in Students Throughout the Medical Course in Ecuador

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1177/23821205241278656
Olga Cecilia Ortiz Palacios, Mila Inés Moreno Pramatárova, Antonio Pazin-Filho
{"title":"Evaluation of Non-Technical Skills in Students Throughout the Medical Course in Ecuador","authors":"Olga Cecilia Ortiz Palacios, Mila Inés Moreno Pramatárova, Antonio Pazin-Filho","doi":"10.1177/23821205241278656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVESThis research focuses on assessing non-technical skills (NTS), comprising behavioral aspects that support an individual's expertise in personal and professional performance. Due to varied terminology, including “soft skills” and other terms, NTS is less understood, leading to a potential gap in the literature and limited attention to their development. This study establishes the need for a comprehensive evaluation of NTS to obtain an objective and complete profile of NTS in students pursuing medicine at the Universidad Central del Ecuador (UCE) during 2023, using a standardized and benchmarked psychometric instrument.METHODSA cross-sectional study assessed 1035 students from the first to the 12th semester using the CompeTEA<jats:sup>®</jats:sup> Test, which evaluates 5 factors encompassing 20 competencies and includes sincerity as a reliability condition. Scores were corrected, analyzed, and standardized using TEAcorrige.RESULTSThe study group comprised 1035 undergraduate medical students (36.8% of students at UCE in 2023), with a mean age of 22.1 years (2.7 standard deviation), and 687 (66.4%) were female. We obtained an average score of 77.7 in sincerity. Factors such as intrapersonal, interpersonal, task development, and managerial skills showed variations throughout the course, with some competencies developing positively in intermediate clinical stages. At the same time, most exhibited a decrease toward the end of the program. Comparisons with population levels revealed 19 competencies at Level 2 and 1 competency predominantly at Level 1.CONCLUSIONThe moderate to low development, with no significant differences based on demographic variables, suggests the need for specific interventions in NTS within comprehensive medical education.","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205241278656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVESThis research focuses on assessing non-technical skills (NTS), comprising behavioral aspects that support an individual's expertise in personal and professional performance. Due to varied terminology, including “soft skills” and other terms, NTS is less understood, leading to a potential gap in the literature and limited attention to their development. This study establishes the need for a comprehensive evaluation of NTS to obtain an objective and complete profile of NTS in students pursuing medicine at the Universidad Central del Ecuador (UCE) during 2023, using a standardized and benchmarked psychometric instrument.METHODSA cross-sectional study assessed 1035 students from the first to the 12th semester using the CompeTEA® Test, which evaluates 5 factors encompassing 20 competencies and includes sincerity as a reliability condition. Scores were corrected, analyzed, and standardized using TEAcorrige.RESULTSThe study group comprised 1035 undergraduate medical students (36.8% of students at UCE in 2023), with a mean age of 22.1 years (2.7 standard deviation), and 687 (66.4%) were female. We obtained an average score of 77.7 in sincerity. Factors such as intrapersonal, interpersonal, task development, and managerial skills showed variations throughout the course, with some competencies developing positively in intermediate clinical stages. At the same time, most exhibited a decrease toward the end of the program. Comparisons with population levels revealed 19 competencies at Level 2 and 1 competency predominantly at Level 1.CONCLUSIONThe moderate to low development, with no significant differences based on demographic variables, suggests the need for specific interventions in NTS within comprehensive medical education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
厄瓜多尔医学课程学生非技术技能评估
目的 本研究侧重于评估非技术性技能(NTS),包括支持个人在个人和专业表现方面的专业知识的行为方面。由于术语(包括 "软技能 "和其他术语)的不同,人们对 NTS 的了解较少,导致文献中可能存在空白,对其发展的关注也有限。本研究确定了对 NTS 进行全面评估的必要性,以便在 2023 年期间,使用标准化和基准化的心理测量工具,对厄瓜多尔中央大学(UCE)医学专业学生的 NTS 进行客观、全面的评估。研究组共有 1035 名医学本科生(占 2023 年欧洲大学学生总数的 36.8%),平均年龄为 22.1 岁(标准差为 2.7),其中 687 名(66.4%)为女生。我们得到的真诚度平均分为 77.7 分。在整个学习过程中,个人、人际、任务发展和管理技能等因素表现出差异,一些能力在临床中期阶段得到了积极发展。同时,大多数人的能力在课程结束时有所下降。与人群水平的比较显示,19 项能力处于 2 级水平,1 项能力主要处于 1 级水平。结论:中度到低度的发展,以及基于人口变量的无显著差异,表明需要在综合医学教育中对 NTS 进行特定干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Non-Technical Skills in Students Throughout the Medical Course in Ecuador What Does Men's Health Education Look Like in Australian University Health Curricula? A Formative Evaluation and Future Enhancement Opportunities Effectiveness of Distance Training Based on Simple Triage and Quick Treatment System (START) Triage System in Pre-Hospital Emergency. Evaluating Outcomes of a Co-Produced Theatre-Based Experiential Learning Project in Psychiatry. From Dilemma to Denouement: Using Literary Techniques to Understand Conflict in Medical Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1