Sisi Yang, Ziliang Ye, Panpan He, Yuanyuan Zhang, Mengyi Liu, Chun Zhou, Yanjun Zhang, Xiaoqin Gan, Yu Huang, Hao Xiang, Xianhui Qin
{"title":"Plasma proteomics for risk prediction of Alzheimer's disease in the general population","authors":"Sisi Yang, Ziliang Ye, Panpan He, Yuanyuan Zhang, Mengyi Liu, Chun Zhou, Yanjun Zhang, Xiaoqin Gan, Yu Huang, Hao Xiang, Xianhui Qin","doi":"10.1111/acel.14330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We aimed to develop and validate a protein risk score for predicting Alzheimer's disease (AD) and compare its performance with a validated clinical risk model (Cognitive Health and Dementia Risk Index for AD [CogDrisk‐AD]) and apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotypes. The development cohort, consisting of 35,547 participants from England in the UK Biobank, was randomly divided into a 7:3 training–testing ratio. The validation cohort included 4667 participants from Scotland and Wales in the UK Biobank. In the training set, an AD protein risk score was constructed using 31 proteins out of 2911 proteins. In the testing set, the AD protein risk score had a C‐index of 0.867 (95% CI, 0.828, 0.906) for AD prediction, followed by CogDrisk‐AD risk factors (C‐index, 0.856; 95% CI, 0.823, 0.889), and APOE genotypes (C‐index, 0.705; 95% CI, 0.660, 0.750). Adding the AD protein risk score to CogDrisk‐AD risk factors (C‐index increase, 0.050; 95% CI, 0.008, 0.093) significantly improved the predictive performance for AD. However, adding CogDrisk‐AD risk factors (C‐index increase, 0.040; 95% CI, −0.007, 0.086) or APOE genotypes (C‐index increase, 0.000; 95% CI, −0.054, 0.055) to the AD protein risk score did not significantly improve the predictive performance for AD. The top 10 proteins with the highest coefficients in the AD protein risk score contributed most of the predictive power for AD risk. These results were verified in the external validation cohort. EGFR, GFAP, and CHGA were identified as key proteins within the protein network. Our result suggests that the AD protein risk score demonstrated a good predictive performance for AD risk.","PeriodicalId":119,"journal":{"name":"Aging Cell","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Cell","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.14330","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We aimed to develop and validate a protein risk score for predicting Alzheimer's disease (AD) and compare its performance with a validated clinical risk model (Cognitive Health and Dementia Risk Index for AD [CogDrisk‐AD]) and apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotypes. The development cohort, consisting of 35,547 participants from England in the UK Biobank, was randomly divided into a 7:3 training–testing ratio. The validation cohort included 4667 participants from Scotland and Wales in the UK Biobank. In the training set, an AD protein risk score was constructed using 31 proteins out of 2911 proteins. In the testing set, the AD protein risk score had a C‐index of 0.867 (95% CI, 0.828, 0.906) for AD prediction, followed by CogDrisk‐AD risk factors (C‐index, 0.856; 95% CI, 0.823, 0.889), and APOE genotypes (C‐index, 0.705; 95% CI, 0.660, 0.750). Adding the AD protein risk score to CogDrisk‐AD risk factors (C‐index increase, 0.050; 95% CI, 0.008, 0.093) significantly improved the predictive performance for AD. However, adding CogDrisk‐AD risk factors (C‐index increase, 0.040; 95% CI, −0.007, 0.086) or APOE genotypes (C‐index increase, 0.000; 95% CI, −0.054, 0.055) to the AD protein risk score did not significantly improve the predictive performance for AD. The top 10 proteins with the highest coefficients in the AD protein risk score contributed most of the predictive power for AD risk. These results were verified in the external validation cohort. EGFR, GFAP, and CHGA were identified as key proteins within the protein network. Our result suggests that the AD protein risk score demonstrated a good predictive performance for AD risk.
Aging CellBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cell Biology
自引率
2.60%
发文量
212
期刊介绍:
Aging Cell is an Open Access journal that focuses on the core aspects of the biology of aging, encompassing the entire spectrum of geroscience. The journal's content is dedicated to publishing research that uncovers the mechanisms behind the aging process and explores the connections between aging and various age-related diseases. This journal aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the biological underpinnings of aging and its implications for human health.
The journal is widely recognized and its content is abstracted and indexed by numerous databases and services, which facilitates its accessibility and impact in the scientific community. These include:
Academic Search (EBSCO Publishing)
Academic Search Alumni Edition (EBSCO Publishing)
Academic Search Premier (EBSCO Publishing)
Biological Science Database (ProQuest)
CAS: Chemical Abstracts Service (ACS)
Embase (Elsevier)
InfoTrac (GALE Cengage)
Ingenta Select
ISI Alerting Services
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics)
MEDLINE/PubMed (NLM)
Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)
PubMed Dietary Supplement Subset (NLM)
Science Citation Index Expanded (Clarivate Analytics)
SciTech Premium Collection (ProQuest)
Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics)
Being indexed in these databases ensures that the research published in Aging Cell is discoverable by researchers, clinicians, and other professionals interested in the field of aging and its associated health issues. This broad coverage helps to disseminate the journal's findings and contributes to the advancement of knowledge in geroscience.