The preliminary study of delta checks for immunoglobulins and complements in the clinical laboratory

Xiangmei Gong, Shukang He, Li Luo, Chunyu Ding, Xin Qin, Yilong Yuan, Pengcheng Cai, Lihua Yang
{"title":"The preliminary study of delta checks for immunoglobulins and complements in the clinical laboratory","authors":"Xiangmei Gong, Shukang He, Li Luo, Chunyu Ding, Xin Qin, Yilong Yuan, Pengcheng Cai, Lihua Yang","doi":"10.1177/00045632241287135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To determine delta check limits for immunoglobulins and complements in outpatients and inpatients based on patient data and biological variation due to the lack of relevant studies. Methods: Patient data for IgA, IgG, IgM, IgE, C3 and C4 from January 1st, 2022 to December 31st, 2023 was collected from laboratory information system (LIS) in our clinical laboratory of wuhan union hospital, which includes both outpatients and inpatients. The delta difference (DD), delta percent change (DPC) and reference change value (RCV) were calculated based on patient data and biological variation. Results: For DDs, there are significant differences between outpatients and inpatients in C4, IgE, IgG, and IgM. For DPCs, the corresponding analytes which are significantly different are C3, C4, IgE, IgG, and IgM. Two sources of CVI to calculate the RCV of IgA, IgG, IgM, C3 and C4 were applied in this study, which revealed that two kinds of RCVs based on different biological variation databases are similar to each other, but both were smaller than delta check limits based on patient data, except for C4. Conclusions: The delta check is a useful tool to monitor potential errors which may occur in total testing process. We hope our findings could be helpful for future studies focused on delta checks in immunological analytes. Keywords: Delta check; Patient data; Biological variation; Immunoglobulins; Complements","PeriodicalId":519215,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":"47 1","pages":"45632241287135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632241287135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To determine delta check limits for immunoglobulins and complements in outpatients and inpatients based on patient data and biological variation due to the lack of relevant studies. Methods: Patient data for IgA, IgG, IgM, IgE, C3 and C4 from January 1st, 2022 to December 31st, 2023 was collected from laboratory information system (LIS) in our clinical laboratory of wuhan union hospital, which includes both outpatients and inpatients. The delta difference (DD), delta percent change (DPC) and reference change value (RCV) were calculated based on patient data and biological variation. Results: For DDs, there are significant differences between outpatients and inpatients in C4, IgE, IgG, and IgM. For DPCs, the corresponding analytes which are significantly different are C3, C4, IgE, IgG, and IgM. Two sources of CVI to calculate the RCV of IgA, IgG, IgM, C3 and C4 were applied in this study, which revealed that two kinds of RCVs based on different biological variation databases are similar to each other, but both were smaller than delta check limits based on patient data, except for C4. Conclusions: The delta check is a useful tool to monitor potential errors which may occur in total testing process. We hope our findings could be helpful for future studies focused on delta checks in immunological analytes. Keywords: Delta check; Patient data; Biological variation; Immunoglobulins; Complements
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在临床实验室对免疫球蛋白和补体进行δ检查的初步研究
背景:由于缺乏相关研究,根据患者数据和生物变异确定门诊和住院患者免疫球蛋白和补体的 delta 检查限。研究方法:从武汉协和医院临床实验室的实验室信息系统(LIS)中收集 2022 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 12 月 31 日期间患者的 IgA、IgG、IgM、IgE、C3 和 C4 数据,其中包括门诊患者和住院患者。根据患者数据和生物变异计算出了Delta差异(DD)、Delta百分比变化(DPC)和参考变化值(RCV)。结果显示就 DD 而言,门诊患者和住院患者在 C4、IgE、IgG 和 IgM 方面存在显著差异。对于 DPCs,相应的分析物在 C3、C4、IgE、IgG 和 IgM 方面存在显著差异。本研究采用两种 CVI 来源计算 IgA、IgG、IgM、C3 和 C4 的 RCV,结果显示,基于不同生物变异数据库的两种 RCV 彼此相似,但除 C4 外,均小于基于患者数据的 delta 检验限。结论delta 检查是监测整个测试过程中可能出现的潜在错误的有用工具。希望我们的研究结果能对今后免疫学分析物的 delta 检查研究有所帮助。关键词德尔塔检查;患者数据;生物变异;免疫球蛋白;补体
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
LabMedUK24 conference Brighton – editorial The preliminary study of delta checks for immunoglobulins and complements in the clinical laboratory Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease co-occuring with Hashimoto thyroiditis: A case report and literature review Thank you to reviewers Methods and reagent-lot comparisons by regression analysis: sample size considerations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1