{"title":"Implications of feedback solutions to the $S_8$ tension for the baryon fractions of galaxy groups and clusters","authors":"Jaime Salcido, Ian G. McCarthy","doi":"arxiv-2409.05716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent large-scale structure (LSS) surveys have revealed a persistent tension\nin the value of $S_8$ compared to predictions from the standard cosmological\nmodel. This tension may suggest the need for new physics beyond the standard\nmodel, but an accurate characterisation of baryonic effects is essential to\navoid biases. Although some studies indicate that baryonic effects are too\nsmall to resolve this tension, others propose that more aggressive feedback\nmechanisms could reconcile differences between cosmic microwave background\n(CMB) measurements and low-redshift LSS observations. In this paper, we\ninvestigate the role of baryonic effects in alleviating the $S_8$ tension. We\nextend the SP(k) model (Salcido et al. 2023), which was trained on hundreds of\ncosmological hydrodynamical simulations to map the suppression of the matter\npower spectrum to the baryon fraction in groups and clusters, to predict the\nrequired baryon fraction for a given $P(k)$ suppression. We then compare\npredictions from recent cosmic shear (weak lensing) analyses with the latest\nbaryon budget measurements from X-ray and weak gravitational lensing studies.\nOur findings show that studies marginalising over baryonic effects while fixing\ncosmological parameters to a Planck-like cosmology predict strong $P(k)$\nsuppression and baryon fractions that are much lower than existing low-redshift\nbaryon budget estimates of galaxy groups and clusters. Conversely, most studies\nthat marginalise over both cosmological parameters and baryonic effects imply\nbaryon fractions that are consistent with observations but lower values of\n$S_8$ than inferred from the CMB. Unless the observed baryon fractions are\nbiased high by a factor of several, these results suggest that a mechanism\nbeyond baryonic physics alone is required to modify or slow down the growth of\nstructure in the universe in order to resolve the $S_8$ tension.","PeriodicalId":501207,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.05716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recent large-scale structure (LSS) surveys have revealed a persistent tension
in the value of $S_8$ compared to predictions from the standard cosmological
model. This tension may suggest the need for new physics beyond the standard
model, but an accurate characterisation of baryonic effects is essential to
avoid biases. Although some studies indicate that baryonic effects are too
small to resolve this tension, others propose that more aggressive feedback
mechanisms could reconcile differences between cosmic microwave background
(CMB) measurements and low-redshift LSS observations. In this paper, we
investigate the role of baryonic effects in alleviating the $S_8$ tension. We
extend the SP(k) model (Salcido et al. 2023), which was trained on hundreds of
cosmological hydrodynamical simulations to map the suppression of the matter
power spectrum to the baryon fraction in groups and clusters, to predict the
required baryon fraction for a given $P(k)$ suppression. We then compare
predictions from recent cosmic shear (weak lensing) analyses with the latest
baryon budget measurements from X-ray and weak gravitational lensing studies.
Our findings show that studies marginalising over baryonic effects while fixing
cosmological parameters to a Planck-like cosmology predict strong $P(k)$
suppression and baryon fractions that are much lower than existing low-redshift
baryon budget estimates of galaxy groups and clusters. Conversely, most studies
that marginalise over both cosmological parameters and baryonic effects imply
baryon fractions that are consistent with observations but lower values of
$S_8$ than inferred from the CMB. Unless the observed baryon fractions are
biased high by a factor of several, these results suggest that a mechanism
beyond baryonic physics alone is required to modify or slow down the growth of
structure in the universe in order to resolve the $S_8$ tension.