Chasing the beginning of reionization in the JWST era

Christopher Cain, Garett Lopez, Anson D'Aloisio, Julian B. Munoz, Rolf A. Jansen, Rogier A. Windhorst, Nakul Gangolli
{"title":"Chasing the beginning of reionization in the JWST era","authors":"Christopher Cain, Garett Lopez, Anson D'Aloisio, Julian B. Munoz, Rolf A. Jansen, Rogier A. Windhorst, Nakul Gangolli","doi":"arxiv-2409.02989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent JWST observations at $z > 6$ may imply galactic ionizing photon\nproduction in excess of prior expectations. Under observationally motivated\nassumptions about escape fractions, these suggest a $z \\sim 8-9$ end to\nreionization, in strong tension with the $z < 6$ end required by the Ly$\\alpha$\nforest. In this work, we use radiative transfer simulations to understand what\ndifferent observations tell us about when reionization ended and when it\nstarted. We consider a model that ends too early (at $z \\approx 8$) alongside\ntwo more realistic scenarios that end late at $z \\approx 5$: one that starts\nlate ($z \\sim 9$) and another that starts early ($z \\sim 13$). We find that the\nlatter requires up to an order-of-magnitude evolution in galaxy ionizing\nproperties at $6 < z < 12$, perhaps in tension with recent measurements of\n$\\xi_{\\rm ion}$ by JWST, which indicate little evolution. We also study how\nthese models compare to recent measurements of the Ly$\\alpha$ forest opacity,\nmean free path, IGM thermal history, visibility of $z > 8$ Ly$\\alpha$ emitters,\nand the patchy kSZ signal from the CMB. We find that neither of the late-ending\nscenarios is conclusively disfavored by any single data set. However, a\nmajority of these observables, spanning several distinct types of observations,\nprefer a late start. Not all probes agree with this conclusion, hinting at a\npossible lack of concordance between observables. Observations by multiple\nexperiments (including JWST, Roman, and CMB-S4) in the coming years will either\nestablish a concordance picture of reionization's early stages or reveal\nsystematics in data and/or theoretical modeling.","PeriodicalId":501207,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics","volume":"2012 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.02989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent JWST observations at $z > 6$ may imply galactic ionizing photon production in excess of prior expectations. Under observationally motivated assumptions about escape fractions, these suggest a $z \sim 8-9$ end to reionization, in strong tension with the $z < 6$ end required by the Ly$\alpha$ forest. In this work, we use radiative transfer simulations to understand what different observations tell us about when reionization ended and when it started. We consider a model that ends too early (at $z \approx 8$) alongside two more realistic scenarios that end late at $z \approx 5$: one that starts late ($z \sim 9$) and another that starts early ($z \sim 13$). We find that the latter requires up to an order-of-magnitude evolution in galaxy ionizing properties at $6 < z < 12$, perhaps in tension with recent measurements of $\xi_{\rm ion}$ by JWST, which indicate little evolution. We also study how these models compare to recent measurements of the Ly$\alpha$ forest opacity, mean free path, IGM thermal history, visibility of $z > 8$ Ly$\alpha$ emitters, and the patchy kSZ signal from the CMB. We find that neither of the late-ending scenarios is conclusively disfavored by any single data set. However, a majority of these observables, spanning several distinct types of observations, prefer a late start. Not all probes agree with this conclusion, hinting at a possible lack of concordance between observables. Observations by multiple experiments (including JWST, Roman, and CMB-S4) in the coming years will either establish a concordance picture of reionization's early stages or reveal systematics in data and/or theoretical modeling.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 JWST 时代追寻再电离的起点
最近 JWST 在 $z > 6$ 的观测结果可能意味着银河电离光子的产生超出了先前的预期。在以观测为动机的逃逸分数假设下,这些观测结果表明电离结束的时间为$z \sim 8-9$,这与Ly$\alpha$森林所要求的结束时间$z < 6$有很大的矛盾。在这项工作中,我们利用辐射传递模拟来了解不同的观测结果告诉我们什么是再电离结束,什么是再电离开始。我们考虑了一个过早结束的模型(在$z \approx 8$),以及两个更现实的在$z \approx 5$晚期结束的情景:一个是晚期开始($z \sim 9$),另一个是早期开始($z \sim 13$)。我们发现,后者要求星系电离特性在$6 < z < 12$时有高达一个数量级的演化,这也许与JWST最近对$xi_{/rm ion}$的测量结果不一致,后者表明几乎没有演化。我们还研究了这些模型与最近对Ly$\alpha$森林不透明性、平均自由路径、IGM热历史、$z > 8$ Ly$\alpha$发射器的可见度以及来自CMB的零星kSZ信号的测量结果的比较。我们发现,任何一个数据集都不能最终否定晚端天体的存在。然而,这些观测数据中的绝大多数,包括几种不同类型的观测数据,都倾向于晚开始。并非所有探测结果都同意这一结论,这表明观测数据之间可能缺乏一致性。在未来几年里,多个实验(包括 JWST、Roman 和 CMB-S4)的观测要么会建立再电离早期阶段的一致性图景,要么会揭示数据和/或理论建模中的系统学问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Weak Lensing analysis of Abell 2390 using short exposures Optimizing Redshift Distribution Inference through Joint Self-Calibration and Clustering-Redshift Synergy Reionization relics in the cross-correlation between the Ly$α$ forest and 21 cm intensity mapping in the post-reionization era The Low-Redshift Lyman Continuum Survey: The Roles of Stellar Feedback and ISM Geometry in LyC Escape First confirmation of anisotropic bias from statistically anisotropic matter distributions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1