{"title":"Star-Crossed Labours: Checking Consistency Between Current Supernovae Compilations","authors":"William L. Matthewson, Arman Shafieloo","doi":"arxiv-2409.02550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We make use of model-independent statistical methods to assess the\nconsistency of three different supernova compilations: Union3, Pantheon+ and\nDES 5-year supernovae. We expand the available model space of each, using\nCrossing Statistics, and test the compatibility of each dataset, against the\nother two. This is done using (I) a Flat $\\Lambda$CDM fitting to, and (II)\nIterative Smoothing from, one particular dataset, and determining the level of\ndeformation by required to fit the other two. This allows us to test the mutual\nconsistency of the datasets both within the standard model and in the case of\nsome extended model, motivated by features present in a particular dataset. We\nfind that, in both these cases, the data are only consistent with the point in\nthe parameter space corresponding to zero deformation, at around a $2\\sigma$\nlevel, with the DES compilation showing the largest disagreement. However, all\nthree datasets are still found to be consistent to within $1-2\\sigma$ for some\nsubset of the extended model space implied by the deformations.","PeriodicalId":501207,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.02550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We make use of model-independent statistical methods to assess the
consistency of three different supernova compilations: Union3, Pantheon+ and
DES 5-year supernovae. We expand the available model space of each, using
Crossing Statistics, and test the compatibility of each dataset, against the
other two. This is done using (I) a Flat $\Lambda$CDM fitting to, and (II)
Iterative Smoothing from, one particular dataset, and determining the level of
deformation by required to fit the other two. This allows us to test the mutual
consistency of the datasets both within the standard model and in the case of
some extended model, motivated by features present in a particular dataset. We
find that, in both these cases, the data are only consistent with the point in
the parameter space corresponding to zero deformation, at around a $2\sigma$
level, with the DES compilation showing the largest disagreement. However, all
three datasets are still found to be consistent to within $1-2\sigma$ for some
subset of the extended model space implied by the deformations.