Joey Braspenning, Joop Schaye, Matthieu Schaller, Roi Kugel, Scott T. Kay
{"title":"Hydrostatic mass bias for galaxy groups and clusters in the FLAMINGO simulations","authors":"Joey Braspenning, Joop Schaye, Matthieu Schaller, Roi Kugel, Scott T. Kay","doi":"arxiv-2409.07849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The masses of galaxy clusters are commonly measured from X-ray observations\nunder the assumption of hydrostatic equilibrium (HSE). This technique is known\nto underestimate the true mass systematically. The fiducial FLAMINGO\ncosmological hydrodynamical simulation predicts the median hydrostatic mass\nbias to increase from $b_\\text{HSE} \\equiv\n(M_\\text{HSE,500c}-M_\\text{500c})/M_\\text{500c} \\approx -0.1$ to -0.2 when the\ntrue mass increases from group to cluster mass scales. However, the bias is\nnearly independent of the hydrostatic mass. The scatter at fixed true mass is\nminimum for $M_\\text{500c}\\sim 10^{14}~\\text{M}_\\odot$, where\n$\\sigma(b_\\text{HSE})\\approx 0.1$, but increases rapidly towards lower and\nhigher masses. At a fixed true mass, the hydrostatic masses increase (decrease)\nwith redshift on group (cluster) scales, and the scatter increases. The bias is\ninsensitive to the choice of analytic functions assumed to represent the\ndensity and temperature profiles, but it is sensitive to the goodness of fit,\nwith poorer fits corresponding to a stronger median bias and a larger scatter.\nThe bias is also sensitive to the strength of stellar and AGN feedback. Models\npredicting lower gas fractions yield more (less) biased masses for groups\n(clusters). The scatter in the bias at fixed true mass is due to differences in\nthe pressure gradients rather than in the temperature at $R_\\text{500c}$. The\ntotal kinetic energies within $r_\\text{500c}$ in low- and high-mass clusters\nare sub- and super-virial, respectively, though all become sub-virial when\nexternal pressure is accounted for. Analyses of the terms in the virial and\nEuler equations suggest that non-thermal motions, including rotation, account\nfor most of the hydrostatic mass bias. However, we find that the mass bias\nestimated from X-ray luminosity weighted profiles strongly overestimates the\ndeviations from hydrostatic equilibrium.","PeriodicalId":501207,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The masses of galaxy clusters are commonly measured from X-ray observations
under the assumption of hydrostatic equilibrium (HSE). This technique is known
to underestimate the true mass systematically. The fiducial FLAMINGO
cosmological hydrodynamical simulation predicts the median hydrostatic mass
bias to increase from $b_\text{HSE} \equiv
(M_\text{HSE,500c}-M_\text{500c})/M_\text{500c} \approx -0.1$ to -0.2 when the
true mass increases from group to cluster mass scales. However, the bias is
nearly independent of the hydrostatic mass. The scatter at fixed true mass is
minimum for $M_\text{500c}\sim 10^{14}~\text{M}_\odot$, where
$\sigma(b_\text{HSE})\approx 0.1$, but increases rapidly towards lower and
higher masses. At a fixed true mass, the hydrostatic masses increase (decrease)
with redshift on group (cluster) scales, and the scatter increases. The bias is
insensitive to the choice of analytic functions assumed to represent the
density and temperature profiles, but it is sensitive to the goodness of fit,
with poorer fits corresponding to a stronger median bias and a larger scatter.
The bias is also sensitive to the strength of stellar and AGN feedback. Models
predicting lower gas fractions yield more (less) biased masses for groups
(clusters). The scatter in the bias at fixed true mass is due to differences in
the pressure gradients rather than in the temperature at $R_\text{500c}$. The
total kinetic energies within $r_\text{500c}$ in low- and high-mass clusters
are sub- and super-virial, respectively, though all become sub-virial when
external pressure is accounted for. Analyses of the terms in the virial and
Euler equations suggest that non-thermal motions, including rotation, account
for most of the hydrostatic mass bias. However, we find that the mass bias
estimated from X-ray luminosity weighted profiles strongly overestimates the
deviations from hydrostatic equilibrium.
星系团的质量通常是在静水平衡(HSE)假设下通过 X 射线观测测得的。众所周知,这种技术系统地低估了真实质量。根据FLAMINGO宇宙学流体力学模拟的预测,中位静水质量偏差将从$b_text{HSE}增加到$m_text{HSE}。\equiv(M_\text{HSE,500c}-M_\text{500c})/M_\text{500c}\当真实质量从群体质量尺度增加到星团质量尺度时,偏差约为-0.1$到-0.2$。然而,偏差几乎与静水质量无关。固定真实质量下的散度在$M_text{500c}\sim 10^{14}~\text{M}_\odot$ 时最小,此时$sigma(b_text{HSE})\approx 0.1$,但随着质量的降低和提高,散度迅速增大。在固定的真实质量下,流体静力学质量随着群(星团)尺度的红移而增加(减少),散度也随之增加。偏差对所假定的表示密度和温度剖面的解析函数的选择并不敏感,但它对拟合的好坏也很敏感,拟合得越差,中值偏差越大,散度也越大。预测气体比例较低的模型会产生较多(较少)的群(星团)质量偏差。在真实质量固定的情况下,偏差的散布是由于压力梯度的不同而不是R_text{500c}$温度的不同造成的。低质量和高质量星团在$r_text{500c}$范围内的总动能分别是亚漩涡和超漩涡的,尽管在考虑了外部压力后都变成了亚漩涡。对virial方程和Euler方程中的项的分析表明,包括旋转在内的非热运动是静水质量偏差的主要原因。然而,我们发现根据 X 射线光度加权剖面估算出的质量偏差严重高估了流体静力学平衡的偏差。