The impact of a small‐group mammography video discussion on promoting screening uptake among nonadherent Chinese American immigrant women: A randomized controlled trial
Naomi Q. P. Tan, Grace X. Ma, Annette E. Maxwell, Roger L. Brown, Kathy Zhou, Alice Loh, Lucy Young, Robert J. Volk, Qian Lu, Judy Huei‐Yu Wang
{"title":"The impact of a small‐group mammography video discussion on promoting screening uptake among nonadherent Chinese American immigrant women: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Naomi Q. P. Tan, Grace X. Ma, Annette E. Maxwell, Roger L. Brown, Kathy Zhou, Alice Loh, Lucy Young, Robert J. Volk, Qian Lu, Judy Huei‐Yu Wang","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThe objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an in‐person, small‐group mammography video discussion (SMVD) intervention on mammography uptake among nonadherent Chinese American immigrant women.MethodsWomen (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 956) were randomized into either an SMVD group, where Chinese‐speaking community health workers (CHWs) used an effective, culturally appropriate video to discuss mammography, or a video‐only group, which viewed the cultural video sent by mail. Outcomes were mammography uptake at 6 months and 21 months postintervention.ResultsWomen in both groups increased mammography uptake, and an outcome analysis revealed no group differences (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], .68–2.06). Overall, 61.2% of the SMVD group and 55.3% of the video‐only group had at least one mammogram during the 21‐month follow‐up period. When considering attendance to the SMVD, SMVD attendees had higher mammography uptake than the video‐only group (AOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.19–1.92), and SMVD nonattendees had lower mammography uptake than the video‐only group (AOR, .33; 95% CI, .22–.50).ConclusionsBoth intervention strategies were associated with increased mammography uptake. The authors observed that the increase in use was greater among women who participated in the SMVD session compared with those who viewed the cultural video only. Future research may explore a virtual SMVD intervention for higher session attendance and increased mammography uptake (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01292200).","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35524","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundThe objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an in‐person, small‐group mammography video discussion (SMVD) intervention on mammography uptake among nonadherent Chinese American immigrant women.MethodsWomen (N = 956) were randomized into either an SMVD group, where Chinese‐speaking community health workers (CHWs) used an effective, culturally appropriate video to discuss mammography, or a video‐only group, which viewed the cultural video sent by mail. Outcomes were mammography uptake at 6 months and 21 months postintervention.ResultsWomen in both groups increased mammography uptake, and an outcome analysis revealed no group differences (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], .68–2.06). Overall, 61.2% of the SMVD group and 55.3% of the video‐only group had at least one mammogram during the 21‐month follow‐up period. When considering attendance to the SMVD, SMVD attendees had higher mammography uptake than the video‐only group (AOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.19–1.92), and SMVD nonattendees had lower mammography uptake than the video‐only group (AOR, .33; 95% CI, .22–.50).ConclusionsBoth intervention strategies were associated with increased mammography uptake. The authors observed that the increase in use was greater among women who participated in the SMVD session compared with those who viewed the cultural video only. Future research may explore a virtual SMVD intervention for higher session attendance and increased mammography uptake (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01292200).
期刊介绍:
The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society.
CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research