Meta-analysis of the diagnostic value of functional magnetic resonance imaging for distinguishing unresponsive wakefulness syndrome/vegetative state and minimally conscious state

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Frontiers in Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.3389/fnins.2024.1395639
Helin Zheng, Lu Tian, Jinhua Cai
{"title":"Meta-analysis of the diagnostic value of functional magnetic resonance imaging for distinguishing unresponsive wakefulness syndrome/vegetative state and minimally conscious state","authors":"Helin Zheng, Lu Tian, Jinhua Cai","doi":"10.3389/fnins.2024.1395639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveUnresponsive wakefulness syndrome/vegetative state (UWS/<jats:italic>VS</jats:italic>) and minimally conscious state (MCS) are considered different clinical entities, but their differential diagnosis remains challenging. As a potential clinical tool, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) could detect residual awareness without the need for the patients’ actual motor responses. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of fMRI for distinguishing between UWS/<jats:italic>VS</jats:italic> and MCS through a meta-analysis of the existing studies.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search (from the database creation date to November. 2023) for relevant English articles on fMRI for the differential diagnosis of UWS/<jats:italic>VS</jats:italic> and MCS. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR−), summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated to assess the diagnostic value of fMRI in distinguishing between UWS/<jats:italic>VS</jats:italic> and MCS. The statistical <jats:italic>I</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> test was used to assess heterogeneity, and the source of heterogeneity was investigated by performing a meta-regression analysis. Publication bias was assessed using the Deeks funnel plot asymmetry test.ResultsTen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.71 (95% CI 0.62–0.79) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.54–0.84), respectively. The fMRI for the differential diagnosis of UWS/<jats:italic>VS</jats:italic> and MCS has a moderate positive likelihood ratio (2.5) and a relatively low negative likelihood ratio (0.40). Additionally, SROC curves showed that the AUC was 0.76 (95% CI 0.72–0.80).ConclusionFunctional magnetic resonance imaging has a good performance in the differential diagnosis of UWS/<jats:italic>VS</jats:italic> and MCS, and may provide a potential tool for evaluating the prognosis and guiding the rehabilitation therapy in patients with disorders of consciousness.","PeriodicalId":12639,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2024.1395639","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveUnresponsive wakefulness syndrome/vegetative state (UWS/VS) and minimally conscious state (MCS) are considered different clinical entities, but their differential diagnosis remains challenging. As a potential clinical tool, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) could detect residual awareness without the need for the patients’ actual motor responses. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of fMRI for distinguishing between UWS/VS and MCS through a meta-analysis of the existing studies.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search (from the database creation date to November. 2023) for relevant English articles on fMRI for the differential diagnosis of UWS/VS and MCS. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR−), summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated to assess the diagnostic value of fMRI in distinguishing between UWS/VS and MCS. The statistical I2 test was used to assess heterogeneity, and the source of heterogeneity was investigated by performing a meta-regression analysis. Publication bias was assessed using the Deeks funnel plot asymmetry test.ResultsTen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.71 (95% CI 0.62–0.79) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.54–0.84), respectively. The fMRI for the differential diagnosis of UWS/VS and MCS has a moderate positive likelihood ratio (2.5) and a relatively low negative likelihood ratio (0.40). Additionally, SROC curves showed that the AUC was 0.76 (95% CI 0.72–0.80).ConclusionFunctional magnetic resonance imaging has a good performance in the differential diagnosis of UWS/VS and MCS, and may provide a potential tool for evaluating the prognosis and guiding the rehabilitation therapy in patients with disorders of consciousness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
功能磁共振成像在区分无反应清醒综合征/植物状态和微意识状态方面的诊断价值的元分析
目的无反应清醒综合征/植物状态(UWS/VS)和微意识状态(MCS)被认为是不同的临床实体,但它们之间的鉴别诊断仍具有挑战性。作为一种潜在的临床工具,功能磁共振成像(fMRI)可检测残余意识,而无需患者的实际运动反应。本研究旨在通过对现有研究进行荟萃分析,探讨 fMRI 在区分 UWS/VS 和 MCS 方面的诊断价值。方法我们对 fMRI 用于 UWS/VS 和 MCS 鉴别诊断的相关英文文章进行了全面检索(从数据库创建日期到 2023 年 11 月)。我们计算了汇总的灵敏度、特异性、阳性似然比(LR+)、阴性似然比(LR-)、总结接收者操作特征曲线(SROC)和曲线下面积(AUC),以评估 fMRI 在区分 UWS/VS 和 MCS 方面的诊断价值。采用统计I2检验评估异质性,并通过元回归分析研究异质性的来源。使用 Deeks 漏斗图不对称检验评估了发表偏倚。汇总的敏感性和特异性分别为 0.71(95% CI 0.62-0.79)和 0.71(95% CI 0.54-0.84)。用于鉴别诊断 UWS/VS 和 MCS 的 fMRI 具有中等程度的阳性似然比(2.5)和相对较低的阴性似然比(0.40)。此外,SROC 曲线显示 AUC 为 0.76(95% CI 0.72-0.80)。结论功能磁共振成像在 UWS/VS 和 MCS 的鉴别诊断中表现良好,可为意识障碍患者的预后评估和康复治疗提供潜在的指导工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Frontiers in Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
2070
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Neural Technology is devoted to the convergence between neurobiology and quantum-, nano- and micro-sciences. In our vision, this interdisciplinary approach should go beyond the technological development of sophisticated methods and should contribute in generating a genuine change in our discipline.
期刊最新文献
Dual-factor model of sleep and diet: a new approach to understanding central fatigue The digital twin in neuroscience: from theory to tailored therapy Corrigendum: Diagnosis for autism spectrum disorder children using T1-based gray matter and arterial spin labeling-based cerebral blood flow network metrics. Inclusion, reporting and analysis of demographic variables in chronobiology and sleep research. Study of a precise treatment protocol for patients with consciousness disorders based on the brain network analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1