Anaerobic digestion of food waste with a selective mixed-microbial consortium and its evaluation with different optimization methods

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1007/s10163-024-02034-1
Neeraj Raja Ram, G. N. Nikhil
{"title":"Anaerobic digestion of food waste with a selective mixed-microbial consortium and its evaluation with different optimization methods","authors":"Neeraj Raja Ram, G. N. Nikhil","doi":"10.1007/s10163-024-02034-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Food waste (FW) is a valuable resource for anaerobic digestion (AD) due to its biochemical composition. This study aimed to optimize AD using two widely used optimization methods: Response Surface Methodology with Box–Behnken Design (RSM-BBD) and Taguchi orthogonal array L9. Organic load, oxidation–reduction potential, pH, and hydraulic retention time were evaluated for biogas production and volatile solids removal (VS<sub>r</sub>). The Taguchi method assessed responses based on the signal-to-noise ratio, resulting in optimal conditions for AD. After numerical optimization, the predicted biogas production was 440 mL, and VS<sub>r</sub> was 19.5%. However, the experimental observations of biogas production were 850 mL, and VS<sub>r</sub> was 41%. The RSM-BBD method, calculated based on analysis of variance, resulted in optimal conditions for AD, and after numerical optimization, the predicted biogas production was 852 mL, and VS<sub>r</sub> was 43%. However, the experimental observations of biogas production were 906 mL, and VS<sub>r</sub> was 44. Despite these results, the study found that Taguchi’s design provided approximate optimization response values and did not allow parameter interaction. In contrast, RSM-BBD provided precise optimal values and details on the impact of individual and combined parameters, making RSM-BBD the preferred choice for optimizing AD systems for better prediction accuracy and reproducibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-024-02034-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food waste (FW) is a valuable resource for anaerobic digestion (AD) due to its biochemical composition. This study aimed to optimize AD using two widely used optimization methods: Response Surface Methodology with Box–Behnken Design (RSM-BBD) and Taguchi orthogonal array L9. Organic load, oxidation–reduction potential, pH, and hydraulic retention time were evaluated for biogas production and volatile solids removal (VSr). The Taguchi method assessed responses based on the signal-to-noise ratio, resulting in optimal conditions for AD. After numerical optimization, the predicted biogas production was 440 mL, and VSr was 19.5%. However, the experimental observations of biogas production were 850 mL, and VSr was 41%. The RSM-BBD method, calculated based on analysis of variance, resulted in optimal conditions for AD, and after numerical optimization, the predicted biogas production was 852 mL, and VSr was 43%. However, the experimental observations of biogas production were 906 mL, and VSr was 44. Despite these results, the study found that Taguchi’s design provided approximate optimization response values and did not allow parameter interaction. In contrast, RSM-BBD provided precise optimal values and details on the impact of individual and combined parameters, making RSM-BBD the preferred choice for optimizing AD systems for better prediction accuracy and reproducibility.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用选择性混合微生物联合体厌氧消化厨余垃圾及其不同优化方法的评估
厨余(FW)因其生化成分而成为厌氧消化(AD)的宝贵资源。本研究旨在使用两种广泛使用的优化方法对厌氧消化进行优化:箱-贝肯设计响应面方法(RSM-BBD)和田口正交阵列 L9。有机负荷、氧化还原电位、pH 值和水力停留时间被用来评估沼气产量和挥发性固体去除率(VSr)。田口方法根据信噪比评估反应,从而得出厌氧消化(AD)的最佳条件。经过数值优化后,预测的沼气产量为 440 毫升,VSr 为 19.5%。然而,实验观测的沼气产量为 850 mL,VSr 为 41%。基于方差分析计算的 RSM-BBD 方法得出了厌氧消化(AD)的最佳条件,经过数值优化后,预测的沼气产量为 852 mL,VSr 为 43%。然而,实验观测的沼气产量为 906 mL,VSr 为 44。尽管得出了这些结果,但研究发现田口设计提供了近似的优化响应值,且不允许参数交互。相比之下,RSM-BBD 提供了精确的最优值,并详细说明了单个参数和组合参数的影响,因此 RSM-BBD 是优化厌氧消化(AD)系统的首选,可提高预测准确性和可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
16.10%
发文量
205
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management has a twofold focus: research in technical, political, and environmental problems of material cycles and waste management; and information that contributes to the development of an interdisciplinary science of material cycles and waste management. Its aim is to develop solutions and prescriptions for material cycles. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, and invited papers from a wide range of disciplines related to material cycles and waste management. The journal is published in cooperation with the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management (JSMCWM) and the Korea Society of Waste Management (KSWM).
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of circular economy practices for management of the reverse chain of electronic waste in Brazil Reaching China’s fertilizer reduction goals through nitrogen and phosphorus recovery: a substance flow analysis case study Students’ perceptions and inclination towards solid waste segregation for circular economy in Krobo municipalities of Ghana: awareness, willingness and potential determinants Study on the mechanisms of retardation of cement hydration by zinc and acceleration of hardening by sodium aluminate from crystallographic phase analysis Poultry litter ash potential as a replacement material in cementitious systems: a state-of-the-art review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1