Zooming in on the self in workplace coaching: Self-regulation and its connection to coaching success

IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1111/joop.12543
Christina Mühlberger, Georg Zerle, Julius Möller, Sandra Julia Diller, Siegfried Greif, Nicklas Kinder, Eva Jonas
{"title":"Zooming in on the self in workplace coaching: Self-regulation and its connection to coaching success","authors":"Christina Mühlberger,&nbsp;Georg Zerle,&nbsp;Julius Möller,&nbsp;Sandra Julia Diller,&nbsp;Siegfried Greif,&nbsp;Nicklas Kinder,&nbsp;Eva Jonas","doi":"10.1111/joop.12543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The coachee's self is central to coaching. Yet the roles that different self-related concepts play in coaching have been insufficiently studied. Specifically, self-control and self-regulation have been conflated or treated as identical concepts. Using the theory of personality systems interactions, we investigated how the development of self-management competencies (SMCs) within coaching facilitates coaching success in two studies with professional samples. Additionally, we examined how coaches support coachees' development of these competencies. Study 1 employed a longitudinal design. Caregivers working as managers engaged in a 5-month coaching programme. Goal attainment increased, need frustration decreased and the SMCs self-regulation and self-access increased, with self-regulation predicting coachees' goal attainment. In Study 2, we conceptually replicated the finding that self-regulation is positively related to coaching success. With a cross-sectional design, we matched self-reported data of 298 coachees with self-reported data of their 75 respective coaches. In a structural equation model, we found that a strong coaching relationship reported by the coaches positively related to the SMCs reported by the coachees. Self-regulation again showed the strongest effect on coaching success. These findings provide theoretical insights into the different effects of self-regulation and self-control on coaching effectiveness and suggest areas of focus for coaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joop.12543","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joop.12543","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The coachee's self is central to coaching. Yet the roles that different self-related concepts play in coaching have been insufficiently studied. Specifically, self-control and self-regulation have been conflated or treated as identical concepts. Using the theory of personality systems interactions, we investigated how the development of self-management competencies (SMCs) within coaching facilitates coaching success in two studies with professional samples. Additionally, we examined how coaches support coachees' development of these competencies. Study 1 employed a longitudinal design. Caregivers working as managers engaged in a 5-month coaching programme. Goal attainment increased, need frustration decreased and the SMCs self-regulation and self-access increased, with self-regulation predicting coachees' goal attainment. In Study 2, we conceptually replicated the finding that self-regulation is positively related to coaching success. With a cross-sectional design, we matched self-reported data of 298 coachees with self-reported data of their 75 respective coaches. In a structural equation model, we found that a strong coaching relationship reported by the coaches positively related to the SMCs reported by the coachees. Self-regulation again showed the strongest effect on coaching success. These findings provide theoretical insights into the different effects of self-regulation and self-control on coaching effectiveness and suggest areas of focus for coaches.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放大工作场所教练中的自我:自我调节及其与教练成功的关系
被教练者的自我是教练的核心。然而,不同的自我相关概念在教练中扮演的角色却没有得到充分的研究。具体而言,自我控制和自我调节被混为一谈,或被视为相同的概念。利用人格系统互动理论,我们在两项针对专业样本的研究中调查了教练中自我管理能力(SMC)的发展如何促进教练的成功。此外,我们还研究了教练如何支持被教练者发展这些能力。研究 1 采用了纵向设计。作为管理者的护理人员参与了为期 5 个月的教练项目。结果显示,被辅导者的目标实现率提高了,需求挫败感降低了,自我管理和自我获取能力提高了,而自我管理能力预测了被辅导者的目标实现率。在研究 2 中,我们从概念上重复了自我调节与教练成功正相关的发现。通过横截面设计,我们将 298 名教练的自我报告数据与 75 名教练的自我报告数据进行了比对。在一个结构方程模型中,我们发现教练所报告的牢固的教练关系与被教练者所报告的SMCs呈正相关。自我调节对教练成功的影响最大。这些发现从理论上揭示了自我调节和自我控制对教练有效性的不同影响,并提出了教练需要关注的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology aims to increase understanding of people and organisations at work including: - industrial, organizational, work, vocational and personnel psychology - behavioural and cognitive aspects of industrial relations - ergonomics and human factors Innovative or interdisciplinary approaches with a psychological emphasis are particularly welcome. So are papers which develop the links between occupational/organisational psychology and other areas of the discipline, such as social and cognitive psychology.
期刊最新文献
A dual cognitive pathway model of leadership influence on creativity Exploring the necessary roles of basic psychological needs at work: A necessary condition analysis An investigation of applicant impression management profiles over time The challenge of managing and retaining risks: How a paradox perspective reduces harm, realizes opportunities and enriches performance Bridging the Principle-Implementation Gap: Evaluating organizational change to achieve interoperability between the UK Emergency Services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1