Hybrid data-driven model for predicting the shear strength of discontinuous rock materials

IF 3.7 3区 材料科学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Materials Today Communications Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.110327
Daxing Lei, Yaoping Zhang, Zhigang Lu, Bo Liu, Hang Lin
{"title":"Hybrid data-driven model for predicting the shear strength of discontinuous rock materials","authors":"Daxing Lei, Yaoping Zhang, Zhigang Lu, Bo Liu, Hang Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.110327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The shear strength of the rock discontinuities with different joint wall strengths (DDJS) is one of the important factors in the process of geotechnical engineering construction. This study presents a new data-driven model for predicting the shear strength of DDJS. This model uses conventional rock mechanics properties as inputs, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model as surrogate model, and sparrow search algorithm optimized by levy flight strategy (LSSA) to optimize the hyperparameters of XGBoost model. Based on the collected database, the proposed model (LSSA- XGBoost model) establishes a nonlinear relationship between the shear strength of DDJS and the inputs. Then, the effects of data division ratio and different data preprocessing methods on the model are discussed. In order to verify the validity of LSSA- XGBoost model, it is compared with the original XGBoost model and SSA- XGBoost model. The results show that the LSSA- XGBoost model has high prediction accuracy with coefficient of determination (R) as high as 0.972 and root mean square error (RMSE) as low as 0.075. Moreover, the LSSA- XGBoost model avoids the disadvantage of SSA's optimization search falling into the local optimal value, and its running speed is significantly faster than that of the SSA- XGBoost model. For this database, the minimum-maximum normalization method and the 8:2 division ratio are the most suitable. The findings confirm the potential of this method and its superiority in predicting the shear strength of DDJS.","PeriodicalId":18477,"journal":{"name":"Materials Today Communications","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Today Communications","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.110327","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The shear strength of the rock discontinuities with different joint wall strengths (DDJS) is one of the important factors in the process of geotechnical engineering construction. This study presents a new data-driven model for predicting the shear strength of DDJS. This model uses conventional rock mechanics properties as inputs, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model as surrogate model, and sparrow search algorithm optimized by levy flight strategy (LSSA) to optimize the hyperparameters of XGBoost model. Based on the collected database, the proposed model (LSSA- XGBoost model) establishes a nonlinear relationship between the shear strength of DDJS and the inputs. Then, the effects of data division ratio and different data preprocessing methods on the model are discussed. In order to verify the validity of LSSA- XGBoost model, it is compared with the original XGBoost model and SSA- XGBoost model. The results show that the LSSA- XGBoost model has high prediction accuracy with coefficient of determination (R) as high as 0.972 and root mean square error (RMSE) as low as 0.075. Moreover, the LSSA- XGBoost model avoids the disadvantage of SSA's optimization search falling into the local optimal value, and its running speed is significantly faster than that of the SSA- XGBoost model. For this database, the minimum-maximum normalization method and the 8:2 division ratio are the most suitable. The findings confirm the potential of this method and its superiority in predicting the shear strength of DDJS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测不连续岩石材料剪切强度的混合数据驱动模型
在岩土工程建设过程中,不同节理壁强度的岩石不连续面(DDJS)的抗剪强度是重要因素之一。本研究提出了一种新的数据驱动模型,用于预测 DDJS 的抗剪强度。该模型以常规岩石力学特性为输入,以极端梯度提升(XGBoost)模型为代理模型,并采用征收飞行策略(LSSA)优化的麻雀搜索算法来优化 XGBoost 模型的超参数。根据所收集的数据库,所提出的模型(LSSA- XGBoost 模型)在 DDJS 的剪切强度和输入之间建立了非线性关系。然后,讨论了数据分割比和不同数据预处理方法对模型的影响。为了验证 LSSA- XGBoost 模型的有效性,将其与原始 XGBoost 模型和 SSA- XGBoost 模型进行了比较。结果表明,LSSA- XGBoost 模型具有很高的预测精度,其判定系数 (R) 高达 0.972,均方根误差 (RMSE) 低至 0.075。此外,LSSA- XGBoost 模型避免了 SSA 优化搜索陷入局部最优值的缺点,其运行速度明显快于 SSA- XGBoost 模型。对于该数据库,最小-最大归一化方法和 8:2 的分割比最为合适。研究结果证实了该方法的潜力及其在预测 DDJS 剪切强度方面的优越性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Materials Today Communications
Materials Today Communications Materials Science-General Materials Science
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
1783
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Materials Today Communications is a primary research journal covering all areas of materials science. The journal offers the materials community an innovative, efficient and flexible route for the publication of original research which has not found the right home on first submission.
期刊最新文献
Influences of fiber orientation and process parameters on diamond wire sawn surface characteristics of 2.5D Cf/SiC composites Study on microstructure and corrosion behavior of T-joints of 2A12 and 2A97 aluminum alloys by FSW Efficient degradation of tetracycline by cobalt ferrite modified alkaline solution nanofibrous Ti3C2Tx MXene activated peroxymonosulfate system: Mechanism analysis and pathway Insights into effects of Fe doping on phase stability, martensitic transformation, and magnetic properties in Ni-Mn-Ti-Fe all-d-metal Heusler alloys Evolution of microstructure and mechanical properties of electroplated nanocrystalline Ni–Co coating during heating
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1