Beyond Early- and Late-onset Neonatal Sepsis Definitions: What are the Current Causes of Neonatal Sepsis Globally? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Evidence.

Michelle L Harrison,Benjamin F R Dickson,Mike Sharland,Phoebe C M Williams
{"title":"Beyond Early- and Late-onset Neonatal Sepsis Definitions: What are the Current Causes of Neonatal Sepsis Globally? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Evidence.","authors":"Michelle L Harrison,Benjamin F R Dickson,Mike Sharland,Phoebe C M Williams","doi":"10.1097/inf.0000000000004485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sepsis remains a leading cause of neonatal mortality, particularly in low- and lower-middle-income countries (LLMIC). In the context of rising antimicrobial resistance, the etiology of neonatal sepsis is evolving, potentially making currently-recommended empirical treatment guidelines less effective. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the contemporary bacterial pathogens responsible for early-onset sepsis (EOS) and late-onset neonatal sepsis (LOS) to ascertain if historical classifications-that guide empirical therapy recommendations based on assumptions around causative pathogens-may be outdated. We analyzed 48 articles incorporating 757,427 blood and cerebrospinal fluid samples collected from 311,359 neonates across 25 countries, to evaluate 4347 significant bacteria in a random-effects meta-analysis. This revealed gram-negative bacteria were now the predominant cause of both EOS (53%, 2301/4347) and LOS (71%, 2765/3894) globally. In LLMICs, the predominant cause of EOS was Klebsiella spp. (31.7%, 95% CI: 24.1-39.7%) followed by Staphylococcus aureus (17.5%, 95% CI: 8.5 to 28.4%), in marked contrast to the Streptococcus agalactiae burden seen in high-income healthcare settings. Our results reveal clear evidence that the current definitions of EOS and LOS sepsis are outdated, particularly in LLMICs. These outdated definitions may be guiding inappropriate empirical antibiotic prescribing that inadequately covers the causative pathogens responsible for neonatal sepsis globally. Harmonizing sepsis definitions across neonates, children and adults will enable a more acurate comparison of the epidemiology of sepsis in each age group and will enhance knowledge regarding the true morbidity and mortality burden of neonatal sepsis.","PeriodicalId":501652,"journal":{"name":"The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/inf.0000000000004485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sepsis remains a leading cause of neonatal mortality, particularly in low- and lower-middle-income countries (LLMIC). In the context of rising antimicrobial resistance, the etiology of neonatal sepsis is evolving, potentially making currently-recommended empirical treatment guidelines less effective. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the contemporary bacterial pathogens responsible for early-onset sepsis (EOS) and late-onset neonatal sepsis (LOS) to ascertain if historical classifications-that guide empirical therapy recommendations based on assumptions around causative pathogens-may be outdated. We analyzed 48 articles incorporating 757,427 blood and cerebrospinal fluid samples collected from 311,359 neonates across 25 countries, to evaluate 4347 significant bacteria in a random-effects meta-analysis. This revealed gram-negative bacteria were now the predominant cause of both EOS (53%, 2301/4347) and LOS (71%, 2765/3894) globally. In LLMICs, the predominant cause of EOS was Klebsiella spp. (31.7%, 95% CI: 24.1-39.7%) followed by Staphylococcus aureus (17.5%, 95% CI: 8.5 to 28.4%), in marked contrast to the Streptococcus agalactiae burden seen in high-income healthcare settings. Our results reveal clear evidence that the current definitions of EOS and LOS sepsis are outdated, particularly in LLMICs. These outdated definitions may be guiding inappropriate empirical antibiotic prescribing that inadequately covers the causative pathogens responsible for neonatal sepsis globally. Harmonizing sepsis definitions across neonates, children and adults will enable a more acurate comparison of the epidemiology of sepsis in each age group and will enhance knowledge regarding the true morbidity and mortality burden of neonatal sepsis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越早发型和晚发型新生儿败血症的定义:目前全球新生儿败血症的病因是什么?证据的系统回顾和元分析》。
败血症仍然是新生儿死亡的主要原因,尤其是在低收入和中低收入国家(LLMIC)。在抗菌药耐药性不断上升的背景下,新生儿败血症的病因也在不断变化,这可能会降低目前推荐的经验性治疗指南的有效性。我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,评估了导致早发型败血症(EOS)和晚发型新生儿败血症(LOS)的当代细菌病原体,以确定历史分类--基于致病病原体的假设来指导经验性治疗建议--是否可能已经过时。我们分析了 48 篇文章,纳入了从 25 个国家的 311,359 名新生儿采集的 757,427 份血液和脑脊液样本,在随机效应荟萃分析中评估了 4347 种重要细菌。结果显示,革兰氏阴性菌是目前全球 EOS(53%,2301/4347)和 LOS(71%,2765/3894)的主要病因。在 LLMICs,EOS 的主要病因是克雷伯氏菌属(31.7%,95% CI:24.1-39.7%),其次是金黄色葡萄球菌(17.5%,95% CI:8.5-28.4%),这与高收入医疗环境中的无乳链球菌负担形成了鲜明对比。我们的研究结果清楚地表明,目前对 EOS 和 LOS 败血症的定义已经过时,尤其是在内陆医疗中心。这些过时的定义可能会指导不适当的经验性抗生素处方,而这些处方不足以涵盖全球新生儿败血症的致病病原体。统一新生儿、儿童和成人败血症的定义将能更准确地比较各年龄组败血症的流行病学情况,并提高对新生儿败血症的真实发病率和死亡率的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acute Hydrocephalus Caused by Mumps Meningoencephalitis Mimicking Tubercular Meningitis: A Report of Two Cases. Concomitant Rifampicin-Sensitive Pulmonary Tuberculosis With Pre-extremely Drug-Resistant Neuro-Tuberculosis in Child With Steroid-Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome. Beyond Early- and Late-onset Neonatal Sepsis Definitions: What are the Current Causes of Neonatal Sepsis Globally? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Evidence. Planetary Health: What You Need to Know as a Pediatric Infectious Diseases Doctor. Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Children Vertically Exposed to Chikungunya Virus: A Two Years Follow-up Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1