An Australian Single-Center Cohort of Pediatric Empyema: Incidence, Pathogens and Disease Severity, and the Interaction of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Emily R Le Fevre,Hiran Selvadurai,Stuart Haggie
{"title":"An Australian Single-Center Cohort of Pediatric Empyema: Incidence, Pathogens and Disease Severity, and the Interaction of the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Emily R Le Fevre,Hiran Selvadurai,Stuart Haggie","doi":"10.1097/inf.0000000000004544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nEmpyema is the most common complication of pediatric community-acquired pneumonia, posing a significant morbidity to children. Clinicians have observed an increase in empyema rates and acuity in the years following the COVID-19 pandemic.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis retrospective analysis of children managed for empyema in a tertiary pediatric hospital, aimed to compare the incidence and describe the clinical characteristics prepandemic and postpandemic (2017-2023).\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThere were 222 empyema cases, with a median age of 3 years (0.3-15 years). The majority (87.8%) of cases were managed with a chest drain and fibrinolytics. The remaining underwent minimally invasive video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Admissions postpandemic were associated with significantly longer lengths of stays (14 vs 12 days, P ≤ 0.001), higher rates of pediatric intensive care unit admissions (32% vs 26%, P = 0.045), and they required higher level of care (inotropes, noninvasive and invasive ventilation). There were also significantly higher rates of Streptococcus pyogenes (28% vs 7%, P ≤ 0.001), while rates of other organisms were not significantly different. We also noted a significant reduction in immunization rates post-pandemic (95.8% vs 83.1%, P < 0.01); however, there was no significant difference in S. pneumoniae serotypes between epochs.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis study demonstrates an increased rate and severity of pediatric empyemas in the post-pandemic period. We propose that the increase was secondary to the increased rates of S. pyogenes seen in the postpandemic period. This rise in infection rates may be alleviated with nonpharmacologic measures aimed at reducing transmission; however, such measures are not sustainable and should be avoided.","PeriodicalId":501652,"journal":{"name":"The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/inf.0000000000004544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Empyema is the most common complication of pediatric community-acquired pneumonia, posing a significant morbidity to children. Clinicians have observed an increase in empyema rates and acuity in the years following the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS This retrospective analysis of children managed for empyema in a tertiary pediatric hospital, aimed to compare the incidence and describe the clinical characteristics prepandemic and postpandemic (2017-2023). RESULTS There were 222 empyema cases, with a median age of 3 years (0.3-15 years). The majority (87.8%) of cases were managed with a chest drain and fibrinolytics. The remaining underwent minimally invasive video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Admissions postpandemic were associated with significantly longer lengths of stays (14 vs 12 days, P ≤ 0.001), higher rates of pediatric intensive care unit admissions (32% vs 26%, P = 0.045), and they required higher level of care (inotropes, noninvasive and invasive ventilation). There were also significantly higher rates of Streptococcus pyogenes (28% vs 7%, P ≤ 0.001), while rates of other organisms were not significantly different. We also noted a significant reduction in immunization rates post-pandemic (95.8% vs 83.1%, P < 0.01); however, there was no significant difference in S. pneumoniae serotypes between epochs. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates an increased rate and severity of pediatric empyemas in the post-pandemic period. We propose that the increase was secondary to the increased rates of S. pyogenes seen in the postpandemic period. This rise in infection rates may be alleviated with nonpharmacologic measures aimed at reducing transmission; however, such measures are not sustainable and should be avoided.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚小儿肺水肿单中心队列:发病率、病原体和疾病严重程度以及 COVID-19 大流行的相互作用。
背景水肿是小儿社区获得性肺炎最常见的并发症,给儿童带来了严重的发病率。临床医生观察到,在 COVID-19 大流行后的数年中,肺水肿的发病率和严重程度均有所上升。方法:这是一项对一家三级儿科医院中因肺水肿而接受治疗的儿童进行的回顾性分析,旨在比较大流行前和大流行后(2017-2023 年)的发病率并描述其临床特征。结果:共有 222 例肺水肿病例,中位年龄为 3 岁(0.3-15 岁)。大多数病例(87.8%)采用胸腔引流管和纤维蛋白溶解剂治疗。其余病例则接受了视频辅助胸腔镜微创手术。大流行后入院的患者住院时间明显更长(14 天对 12 天,P ≤ 0.001),入住儿科重症监护室的比例更高(32% 对 26%,P = 0.045),需要的护理级别更高(肌注、无创和有创通气)。此外,化脓性链球菌的感染率也明显更高(28% 对 7%,P ≤ 0.001),而其他微生物的感染率则无明显差异。我们还注意到,大流行后免疫接种率明显下降(95.8% vs 83.1%,P < 0.01);但是,不同时期的肺炎链球菌血清型没有明显差异。我们认为,感染率上升的原因是疫后期间化脓性链球菌感染率上升。感染率的上升可以通过旨在减少传播的非药物措施来缓解;但是,这种措施是不可持续的,应该避免。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acute Hydrocephalus Caused by Mumps Meningoencephalitis Mimicking Tubercular Meningitis: A Report of Two Cases. Concomitant Rifampicin-Sensitive Pulmonary Tuberculosis With Pre-extremely Drug-Resistant Neuro-Tuberculosis in Child With Steroid-Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome. Beyond Early- and Late-onset Neonatal Sepsis Definitions: What are the Current Causes of Neonatal Sepsis Globally? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Evidence. Planetary Health: What You Need to Know as a Pediatric Infectious Diseases Doctor. Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Children Vertically Exposed to Chikungunya Virus: A Two Years Follow-up Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1