Competency-based TPACK approaches to computational thinking and integrated STEM: A conceptual exploration

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computer Applications in Engineering Education Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1002/cae.22788
Vladimiras Dolgopolovas, Valentina Dagiene
{"title":"Competency-based TPACK approaches to computational thinking and integrated STEM: A conceptual exploration","authors":"Vladimiras Dolgopolovas,&nbsp;Valentina Dagiene","doi":"10.1002/cae.22788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this conceptual study, we explore the incorporation of computational thinking (CT) within integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education, aiming to enhance the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework for teacher professional development. Despite the fundamental role of mathematics in K-16 and engineering education, its theoretical and practical dimensions in a transdisciplinary STEM context and its interlinks with CT remain underexplored. This gap extends to the professional development of teachers in research-oriented STEM environments, which presents significant challenges. The study aims to address these issues by repositioning cognitive-adaptive competencies such as CT and design thinking (DT) as a crucial enabler for STEM teacher professional competency, advocating for a move beyond normative approaches. We comprehensively analyze the integration efforts of CT in STEM, which often rely on declarative definitions without substantive practical implications. The study poses questions on (1) how CT can be effectively integrated into STEM, (2) the characteristics of the normative-adaptive model for teacher education, and (3) the development of a conceptual educational framework focused on mathematical modeling, simulation design, and student engagement in research. Drawing on innovative educational practices, we scrutinize the integration of CT and DT through examples from mathematics, emphasizing the importance of developing computational models and algorithms. Ultimately, we propose a competency-centered normative-adaptive-context aware model of STEM integration (NACAMS)-TPACK model that enhances the classical TPACK framework by interlinking computational, design, and general pedagogical competencies. This study is particularly relevant for educators, policymakers, and researchers involved in K-16 STEM and engineering education.</p>","PeriodicalId":50643,"journal":{"name":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","volume":"32 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cae.22788","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this conceptual study, we explore the incorporation of computational thinking (CT) within integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education, aiming to enhance the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework for teacher professional development. Despite the fundamental role of mathematics in K-16 and engineering education, its theoretical and practical dimensions in a transdisciplinary STEM context and its interlinks with CT remain underexplored. This gap extends to the professional development of teachers in research-oriented STEM environments, which presents significant challenges. The study aims to address these issues by repositioning cognitive-adaptive competencies such as CT and design thinking (DT) as a crucial enabler for STEM teacher professional competency, advocating for a move beyond normative approaches. We comprehensively analyze the integration efforts of CT in STEM, which often rely on declarative definitions without substantive practical implications. The study poses questions on (1) how CT can be effectively integrated into STEM, (2) the characteristics of the normative-adaptive model for teacher education, and (3) the development of a conceptual educational framework focused on mathematical modeling, simulation design, and student engagement in research. Drawing on innovative educational practices, we scrutinize the integration of CT and DT through examples from mathematics, emphasizing the importance of developing computational models and algorithms. Ultimately, we propose a competency-centered normative-adaptive-context aware model of STEM integration (NACAMS)-TPACK model that enhances the classical TPACK framework by interlinking computational, design, and general pedagogical competencies. This study is particularly relevant for educators, policymakers, and researchers involved in K-16 STEM and engineering education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于能力的计算思维和综合 STEM TPACK 方法:概念探索
在这项概念性研究中,我们探讨了将计算思维(CT)纳入科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)综合教育的问题,旨在加强教师专业发展的技术教学内容知识(TPACK)框架。尽管数学在 K-16 和工程教育中发挥着基础性作用,但其在跨学科 STEM 背景下的理论和实践维度及其与 CT 的相互联系仍未得到充分探索。这一空白延伸到以研究为导向的 STEM 环境中的教师专业发展,从而带来了重大挑战。本研究旨在解决这些问题,将 CT 和设计思维(DT)等认知适应能力重新定位为 STEM 教师专业能力的重要促进因素,倡导超越规范方法。我们全面分析了 STEM 中 CT 的整合工作,这些工作往往依赖于宣言性的定义,而没有实质性的实际意义。研究提出了以下问题:(1)如何将 CT 有效地融入 STEM;(2)教师教育的规范-适应模式的特点;以及(3)以数学建模、模拟设计和学生参与研究为重点的概念教育框架的发展。借鉴创新教育实践,我们通过数学实例仔细研究了 CT 和 DT 的整合,强调了开发计算模型和算法的重要性。最终,我们提出了一个以能力为中心的STEM整合规范-适应-情境意识模型(NACAMS)-TPACK模型,该模型通过将计算、设计和一般教学能力相互联系,增强了经典的TPACK框架。这项研究对于从事 K-16 STEM 和工程教育的教育工作者、政策制定者和研究人员尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computer Applications in Engineering Education
Computer Applications in Engineering Education 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Computer Applications in Engineering Education provides a forum for publishing peer-reviewed timely information on the innovative uses of computers, Internet, and software tools in engineering education. Besides new courses and software tools, the CAE journal covers areas that support the integration of technology-based modules in the engineering curriculum and promotes discussion of the assessment and dissemination issues associated with these new implementation methods.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Impact of basic artificial intelligence (AI) course on understanding concepts, literacy, and empowerment in the field of AI among students Enhancing educational efficiency: Generative AI chatbots and DevOps in Education 4.0 Research and innovation of the “ship navigation radar” course based on the four-in-one approach in engineering education accreditation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1