From general AI to custom AI: the effects of generative conversational AI’s cognitive and emotional conversational skills on user's guidance

IF 2.5 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS Kybernetes Pub Date : 2024-08-15 DOI:10.1108/k-04-2024-0894
Kun Wang, Zhao Pan, Yaobin Lu
{"title":"From general AI to custom AI: the effects of generative conversational AI’s cognitive and emotional conversational skills on user's guidance","authors":"Kun Wang, Zhao Pan, Yaobin Lu","doi":"10.1108/k-04-2024-0894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Generative conversational artificial intelligence (AI) demonstrates powerful conversational skills for general tasks but requires customization for specific tasks. The quality of a custom generative conversational AI highly depends on users’ guidance, which has not been studied by previous research. This study uses social exchange theory to examine how generative conversational AI’s cognitive and emotional conversational skills affect users’ guidance through different types of user engagement, and how these effects are moderated by users’ relationship norm orientation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Based on data collected from 589 actual users using a two-wave survey, this study employed partial least squares structural equation modeling to analyze the proposed hypotheses. Additional analyses were performed to test the robustness of our research model and results.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results reveal that cognitive conversational skills (i.e. tailored and creative responses) positively affected cognitive and emotional engagement. However, understanding emotion influenced cognitive engagement but not emotional engagement, and empathic concern influenced emotional engagement but not cognitive engagement. In addition, cognitive and emotional engagement positively affected users’ guidance. Further, relationship norm orientation moderated some of these effects such that the impact of user engagement on user guidance was stronger for communal-oriented users than for exchange-oriented users.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>First, drawing on social exchange theory, this study empirically examined the drivers of users’ guidance in the context of generative conversational AI, which may enrich the user guidance literature. Second, this study revealed the moderating role of relationship norm orientation in influencing the effect of user engagement on users’ guidance. The findings will deepen our understanding of users’ guidance. Third, the findings provide practical guidelines for designing generative conversational AI from a general AI to a custom AI.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":49930,"journal":{"name":"Kybernetes","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kybernetes","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/k-04-2024-0894","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Generative conversational artificial intelligence (AI) demonstrates powerful conversational skills for general tasks but requires customization for specific tasks. The quality of a custom generative conversational AI highly depends on users’ guidance, which has not been studied by previous research. This study uses social exchange theory to examine how generative conversational AI’s cognitive and emotional conversational skills affect users’ guidance through different types of user engagement, and how these effects are moderated by users’ relationship norm orientation.

Design/methodology/approach

Based on data collected from 589 actual users using a two-wave survey, this study employed partial least squares structural equation modeling to analyze the proposed hypotheses. Additional analyses were performed to test the robustness of our research model and results.

Findings

The results reveal that cognitive conversational skills (i.e. tailored and creative responses) positively affected cognitive and emotional engagement. However, understanding emotion influenced cognitive engagement but not emotional engagement, and empathic concern influenced emotional engagement but not cognitive engagement. In addition, cognitive and emotional engagement positively affected users’ guidance. Further, relationship norm orientation moderated some of these effects such that the impact of user engagement on user guidance was stronger for communal-oriented users than for exchange-oriented users.

Originality/value

First, drawing on social exchange theory, this study empirically examined the drivers of users’ guidance in the context of generative conversational AI, which may enrich the user guidance literature. Second, this study revealed the moderating role of relationship norm orientation in influencing the effect of user engagement on users’ guidance. The findings will deepen our understanding of users’ guidance. Third, the findings provide practical guidelines for designing generative conversational AI from a general AI to a custom AI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从通用人工智能到定制人工智能:生成式对话人工智能的认知和情感对话技能对用户引导的影响
目的 生成式会话人工智能(AI)在一般任务中能展示强大的会话技能,但在特定任务中需要定制。定制生成式会话人工智能的质量在很大程度上取决于用户的引导,而以往的研究尚未对此进行研究。本研究利用社会交换理论来研究生成式人工智能的认知和情感会话技能如何通过不同类型的用户参与来影响用户的引导,以及这些影响如何被用户的关系规范导向所调节。设计/方法/途径基于通过两波调查从 589 名实际用户那里收集到的数据,本研究采用偏最小二乘结构方程模型来分析提出的假设。研究结果显示,认知会话技能(即量身定制和创造性回应)对认知和情感参与度有积极影响。然而,理解情感会影响认知参与度,但不会影响情感参与度;移情关注会影响情感参与度,但不会影响认知参与度。此外,认知和情感参与对用户的引导有积极影响。原创性/价值首先,本研究借鉴社会交换理论,实证研究了生成式对话人工智能背景下用户引导的驱动因素,这可能会丰富用户引导文献。其次,本研究揭示了关系规范导向对用户参与对用户引导影响的调节作用。这些发现将加深我们对用户引导的理解。第三,研究结果为设计从通用人工智能到定制人工智能的生成式对话人工智能提供了实用指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kybernetes
Kybernetes 工程技术-计算机:控制论
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
16.00%
发文量
237
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: Kybernetes is the official journal of the UNESCO recognized World Organisation of Systems and Cybernetics (WOSC), and The Cybernetics Society. The journal is an important forum for the exchange of knowledge and information among all those who are interested in cybernetics and systems thinking. It is devoted to improvement in the understanding of human, social, organizational, technological and sustainable aspects of society and their interdependencies. It encourages consideration of a range of theories, methodologies and approaches, and their transdisciplinary links. The spirit of the journal comes from Norbert Wiener''s understanding of cybernetics as "The Human Use of Human Beings." Hence, Kybernetes strives for examination and analysis, based on a systemic frame of reference, of burning issues of ecosystems, society, organizations, businesses and human behavior.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the effect of collaboration modes on firms’ breakthrough technological innovation: a perspective from the innovation ecosystem Dynamic game research of food agricultural products supply chain based on blockchain traceability technology Parallels between the Physical Vacuum and concept of Qi in Medical Qigong: comprehending oneness Risk transmission and diversification strategies between US real estate investment trusts (REITs) and green finance indices Urban carrying capacity of industrial cities to typhoon-induced Natechs: a cloud Bayesian model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1