Conceptual Understanding of the DNA Molecule Through Model Building at the Initial Learning Stage

IF 3.3 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Science Education and Technology Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1007/s10956-024-10150-8
Salvatore G. Garofalo
{"title":"Conceptual Understanding of the DNA Molecule Through Model Building at the Initial Learning Stage","authors":"Salvatore G. Garofalo","doi":"10.1007/s10956-024-10150-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The initial learning experience is a critical opportunity to support conceptual understanding of abstract STEM concepts. Although hands-on activities and physical three-dimensional models are beneficial, they are seldom utilized and are replaced increasingly by digital simulations and laboratory exercises presented on touchscreen tablet computers. The purpose of this study is to measure the effectiveness of different pedagogical strategies (physical model building, digital model building, or traditional paper worksheets) on short-term and long-term conceptual understanding of an abstract STEM concept. A sample of 161 9th-grade students in six in-tact science classes participated in the study. Conceptual understanding was measured using an objective quiz, a drawing, and a hand-written constructed response explanation. Conceptual understanding was measured immediately after intervention and again two months later. To account for potential covariates, spatial ability and attitudes to scientific inquiry were measured and a conceptual understanding pre-test was administered. For both immediate and delayed post-tests, there were no differences among the groups for the objective quiz measure. However, the physical model group outperformed the digital model and control groups in both the drawing and constructed response measures at both timepoints (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Spatial ability was a significant covariate for objective quiz and drawing measures. Attitudes were not significant throughout. These results suggest that, at the initial learning experience, hands-on manipulation of three-dimensional physical models better aids conceptual understanding in the short term and the long term when compared to two-dimensional touchscreen devices and that assessments should move beyond objective-based exams to accurately measure conceptual understanding.</p>","PeriodicalId":50057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science Education and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science Education and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10150-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The initial learning experience is a critical opportunity to support conceptual understanding of abstract STEM concepts. Although hands-on activities and physical three-dimensional models are beneficial, they are seldom utilized and are replaced increasingly by digital simulations and laboratory exercises presented on touchscreen tablet computers. The purpose of this study is to measure the effectiveness of different pedagogical strategies (physical model building, digital model building, or traditional paper worksheets) on short-term and long-term conceptual understanding of an abstract STEM concept. A sample of 161 9th-grade students in six in-tact science classes participated in the study. Conceptual understanding was measured using an objective quiz, a drawing, and a hand-written constructed response explanation. Conceptual understanding was measured immediately after intervention and again two months later. To account for potential covariates, spatial ability and attitudes to scientific inquiry were measured and a conceptual understanding pre-test was administered. For both immediate and delayed post-tests, there were no differences among the groups for the objective quiz measure. However, the physical model group outperformed the digital model and control groups in both the drawing and constructed response measures at both timepoints (p < 0.01). Spatial ability was a significant covariate for objective quiz and drawing measures. Attitudes were not significant throughout. These results suggest that, at the initial learning experience, hands-on manipulation of three-dimensional physical models better aids conceptual understanding in the short term and the long term when compared to two-dimensional touchscreen devices and that assessments should move beyond objective-based exams to accurately measure conceptual understanding.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在初始学习阶段通过建立模型理解 DNA 分子的概念
最初的学习经历是帮助学生从概念上理解抽象的 STEM 概念的重要机会。虽然动手活动和实物三维模型很有益处,但却很少被利用,取而代之的越来越多的是在触摸屏平板电脑上展示的数字模拟和实验练习。本研究旨在衡量不同教学策略(实物模型制作、数字模型制作或传统纸质工作表)对抽象 STEM 概念的短期和长期概念理解的有效性。本研究抽样调查了 6 个科学班的 161 名九年级学生。对概念理解的测量包括客观测验、绘画和手写的建构式反应解释。干预结束后立即测量概念理解,两个月后再次测量。为了考虑潜在的协变量,还测量了学生的空间能力和对科学探究的态度,并进行了概念理解力前测。在即时和延迟后测中,各组之间的客观测验测量结果没有差异。然而,实物模型组在两个时间点的绘画和建构反应测量中均优于数字模型组和对照组(p < 0.01)。空间能力是客观测验和绘画测量的重要协变量。在整个过程中,态度并不重要。这些结果表明,与二维触摸屏设备相比,在最初的学习体验中,动手操作三维物理模型在短期和长期内都能更好地帮助学生理解概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Science Education and Technology
Journal of Science Education and Technology EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Science Education and Technology is an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of original peer-reviewed, contributed and invited research articles of the highest quality that address the intersection of science education and technology with implications for improving and enhancing science education at all levels across the world. Topics covered can be categorized as disciplinary (biology, chemistry, physics, as well as some applications of computer science and engineering, including the processes of learning, teaching and teacher development), technological (hardware, software, deigned and situated environments involving applications characterized as with, through and in), and organizational (legislation, administration, implementation and teacher enhancement). Insofar as technology plays an ever-increasing role in our understanding and development of science disciplines, in the social relationships among people, information and institutions, the journal includes it as a component of science education. The journal provides a stimulating and informative variety of research papers that expand and deepen our theoretical understanding while providing practice and policy based implications in the anticipation that such high-quality work shared among a broad coalition of individuals and groups will facilitate future efforts.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Simulation-Supported Prediction Observation Explanation Activities on Students’ Conception of Learning Physics Related to Solid and Liquid Pressure A Study of Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) in the Blended Synchronous Science Classroom Framing Geohazard Learning as Risk Assessment Using a Computer Simulation: A Case of Flooding When Tutors Simultaneously Instruct Students from the Primary, Middle, and High School Levels in Online One-on-One Tutoring: Investigating the Interaction Dynamics Using AI, ENA, and LSA Methods “Effects of Educational Robotics on Kindergarteners’ Collaboration, Communication, Critical Thinking, and Creativity: A Meta-Analysis”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1