Empirical prediction on boilover onset and impact for liquid hydrocarbon fire in atmospheric storage tank

Azizul Buang, Muhammad Ameer Zaaba, Muhammad Izham Mohd Yusof, Daneskumar Manogaran, Hani Tiara Faihana Hifni, Muhammad Roil Bilad
{"title":"Empirical prediction on boilover onset and impact for liquid hydrocarbon fire in atmospheric storage tank","authors":"Azizul Buang, Muhammad Ameer Zaaba, Muhammad Izham Mohd Yusof, Daneskumar Manogaran, Hani Tiara Faihana Hifni, Muhammad Roil Bilad","doi":"10.1002/cjce.25485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Boilover can occur several hours after the fuel in a storage tank caught fire. The delayed occurrence is an unknown strong parameter when managing the emergency response operations. Those managing response operations must be aware of the boilover potential and take the precautions to ensure safety. Modelling the phenomenon enables predicting crucial event features and assists in highlighting safety measures, with a key focus on the ignition‐to‐boilover time interval. This study focused on the predictive empirical tool development aimed at estimating the boilover onset time and consequences. This was achieved through series of small‐scale boilover experiments, followed by validation using cases of boilover incidents. The results revealed a linear relationship between the boilover onset time and the initial depth of fuel. Consequently, an empirical correlation was derived to predict the time to boilover. The developed correlation has demonstrated its ability to offer conservative predictions while also exhibiting agreement with both the observed onset time and consequences of boilover events. The reported time to boilover for the Czechowice‐Dziedzice incident is 1050 min, while the predicted time is 1413.2 min. The model showed reasonable agreement with the Amoco Refinery incident. The predicted boilover time of 811.3 min aligns with the boilover incident, reported as 790 and 925 min, respectively. It is evident that the empirical model can predict the time to boilover to a similar order of magnitude. Certain considerations in the development of effective strategies in handling fire scenario with boilover potentials can be assessed using the predictive tool developed.","PeriodicalId":501204,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.25485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Boilover can occur several hours after the fuel in a storage tank caught fire. The delayed occurrence is an unknown strong parameter when managing the emergency response operations. Those managing response operations must be aware of the boilover potential and take the precautions to ensure safety. Modelling the phenomenon enables predicting crucial event features and assists in highlighting safety measures, with a key focus on the ignition‐to‐boilover time interval. This study focused on the predictive empirical tool development aimed at estimating the boilover onset time and consequences. This was achieved through series of small‐scale boilover experiments, followed by validation using cases of boilover incidents. The results revealed a linear relationship between the boilover onset time and the initial depth of fuel. Consequently, an empirical correlation was derived to predict the time to boilover. The developed correlation has demonstrated its ability to offer conservative predictions while also exhibiting agreement with both the observed onset time and consequences of boilover events. The reported time to boilover for the Czechowice‐Dziedzice incident is 1050 min, while the predicted time is 1413.2 min. The model showed reasonable agreement with the Amoco Refinery incident. The predicted boilover time of 811.3 min aligns with the boilover incident, reported as 790 and 925 min, respectively. It is evident that the empirical model can predict the time to boilover to a similar order of magnitude. Certain considerations in the development of effective strategies in handling fire scenario with boilover potentials can be assessed using the predictive tool developed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
常压储罐中液态碳氢化合物起火沸腾和影响的经验预测
沸腾可能在储油罐中的燃料起火数小时后发生。在管理应急响应行动时,延迟发生是一个未知的重要参数。管理应急行动的人员必须意识到沸腾的可能性,并采取预防措施确保安全。对这一现象进行建模可以预测事件的关键特征,有助于突出安全措施,重点是点火到沸腾的时间间隔。本研究侧重于开发预测性经验工具,旨在估算沸腾开始时间和后果。这是通过一系列小规模沸腾实验实现的,随后利用沸腾事故案例进行了验证。结果显示,沸腾开始时间与燃料的初始深度之间存在线性关系。因此,得出了预测沸腾时间的经验相关性。所建立的相关关系证明了其提供保守预测的能力,同时也与观察到的沸腾开始时间和沸腾事件后果相一致。据报告,捷克-捷杰日采事件的沸腾时间为 1050 分钟,而预测时间为 1413.2 分钟。该模型与阿莫科炼油厂事件显示出合理的一致性。预测的沸腾时间为 811.3 分钟,与报告的沸腾事件时间分别为 790 分钟和 925 分钟相吻合。由此可见,经验模型可以在类似数量级上预测沸腾时间。利用所开发的预测工具,可以评估在制定有效策略以处理可能发生沸腾的火灾情况时需要考虑的某些因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intelligent design of nerve guidance conduits: An artificial intelligence‐driven fluid structure interaction study on modelling and optimization of nerve growth Synergistic effect of alcohol polyoxyethylene ether sodium sulphate and copper foam on methane hydrate formation Effect of the main components in gasification wastewater on the surface properties of coal water slurry Global dynamic features and information of adjacent hidden layer enhancement based on autoencoder for industrial process soft sensor application Computational modelling and optimization of physicochemical absorption of CO2 in rotating packed bed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1