Farmers’ preferences for soil conservation measures in Southern Ethiopia: Plot-level discrete choice experiment

IF 4.5 3区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Agricultural Economics Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1111/agec.12852
Tilahun Habtamu Adere, Iris Vanermen, Miet Maertens, Liesbet Vranken
{"title":"Farmers’ preferences for soil conservation measures in Southern Ethiopia: Plot-level discrete choice experiment","authors":"Tilahun Habtamu Adere,&nbsp;Iris Vanermen,&nbsp;Miet Maertens,&nbsp;Liesbet Vranken","doi":"10.1111/agec.12852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study assesses farmers' preferences for the adoption of grass strips as cropland conservation measures and explores the effects of information on their preferences. We further analyze these preferences for plots with varying levels of tenure security and erosion vulnerability. Using survey data from Southern Ethiopia, a plot-level discrete choice experiment in two rounds that includes a video-based information treatment in a within-subject design is conducted. The findings show that farmers prefer to adopt grass strips with a high conservation potential, that can be used as feedstock and that help to stabilize physical structures or delineate plot boundaries. In addition, information transfer increases preferences for adopting grass strips with not only a high conservation potential but also a medium conservation potential. The effects of the information transfer on preferences are found to be heterogeneous and vary with plot characteristics. Under well-defined property rights, farmers prefer to adopt the grass strips for stabilizing physical structures, conserving their cropland against environmental risk or boundary delineation. However, under weak tenure security, they prefer to plant grass strips only for boundary delineation to reduce the institutional risk of losing cropland, but this preference was only observed after information provision. These findings highlight the importance of designing and implementing context-specific agricultural information dissemination systems and that well-defined land rights increase the adoption of land conservation technology in the global south.</p>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/agec.12852","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assesses farmers' preferences for the adoption of grass strips as cropland conservation measures and explores the effects of information on their preferences. We further analyze these preferences for plots with varying levels of tenure security and erosion vulnerability. Using survey data from Southern Ethiopia, a plot-level discrete choice experiment in two rounds that includes a video-based information treatment in a within-subject design is conducted. The findings show that farmers prefer to adopt grass strips with a high conservation potential, that can be used as feedstock and that help to stabilize physical structures or delineate plot boundaries. In addition, information transfer increases preferences for adopting grass strips with not only a high conservation potential but also a medium conservation potential. The effects of the information transfer on preferences are found to be heterogeneous and vary with plot characteristics. Under well-defined property rights, farmers prefer to adopt the grass strips for stabilizing physical structures, conserving their cropland against environmental risk or boundary delineation. However, under weak tenure security, they prefer to plant grass strips only for boundary delineation to reduce the institutional risk of losing cropland, but this preference was only observed after information provision. These findings highlight the importance of designing and implementing context-specific agricultural information dissemination systems and that well-defined land rights increase the adoption of land conservation technology in the global south.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚南部农民对土壤保持措施的偏好:地块级离散选择实验
本研究评估了农民对采用草带作为耕地保护措施的偏好,并探讨了信息对其偏好的影响。我们进一步分析了不同保有权保障水平和水土流失脆弱性的地块的这些偏好。利用埃塞俄比亚南部的调查数据,我们进行了两轮地块级离散选择实验,其中包括主体内设计的基于视频的信息处理。研究结果表明,农民更倾向于采用具有高保护潜力、可用作原料、有助于稳定物理结构或划定地块边界的草带。此外,信息传递不仅增加了采用高保护潜力草带的偏好,也增加了采用中等保护潜力草带的偏好。研究发现,信息转移对偏好的影响是多方面的,并随着地块特征的不同而变化。在产权明确的情况下,农民更愿意采用草带来稳定物理结构、保护耕地免受环境风险或划定边界。然而,在土地使用权保障薄弱的情况下,农民更愿意种植草带,只是为了划定边界,以降低失去耕地的制度风险,但这种偏好只有在提供信息后才能观察到。这些发现强调了设计和实施针对具体情况的农业信息传播系统的重要性,以及明确界定的土地权能提高全球南部对土地保护技术的采用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Economics
Agricultural Economics 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.90%
发文量
62
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Economics aims to disseminate the most important research results and policy analyses in our discipline, from all regions of the world. Topical coverage ranges from consumption and nutrition to land use and the environment, at every scale of analysis from households to markets and the macro-economy. Applicable methodologies include econometric estimation and statistical hypothesis testing, optimization and simulation models, descriptive reviews and policy analyses. We particularly encourage submission of empirical work that can be replicated and tested by others.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Drought risk management in agriculture: A copula perspective on crop diversification Macroeconomic shock effects on beef carcass premiums Farmers’ preferences for soil conservation measures in Southern Ethiopia: Plot-level discrete choice experiment Do place-based policies impact residents’ nutrient intake? Evidence from China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1