ESG Rates Divergence on the Emerging Markets in the European Union

IF 0.7 Q3 ECONOMICS Studies in Business and Economics Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.2478/sbe-2024-0038
Diana Elena Vasiu
{"title":"ESG Rates Divergence on the Emerging Markets in the European Union","authors":"Diana Elena Vasiu","doi":"10.2478/sbe-2024-0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growing emphasis on sustainability has led to a rise of ESG rating providers, but this expansion has brought challenges. ESG ratings are complex and can vary significantly between agencies, due to different scoring methods and non-standardized disclosures, making accurate assessments difficult. Moreover, investors and companies express limited confidence in the accuracy of these ratings. Regulatory developments aim to improve ESG disclosure and comparability, however, discrepancies in assessment criteria and rating methodologies persist. These aspects have led to the increasing concern of researchers from the academic field and professionals from the financial markets to identify how divergent are the ESG rates provided by various suppliers, what are the causes of this divergence, how do these influence the performance of companies and above all, how the negative effects of divergent ESG rates mitigated. Most researchers focused their attention on the aforementioned aspects on the developed financial markets from the USA or Europe, on the top companies or on the companies listed on the BRIC emerging markets. This article analyzes the divergence of ESG rates provided by three well-known rate-providers, for companies listed on emerging markets in Europe, contributing to increasing knowledge in this field.","PeriodicalId":43310,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Business and Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Business and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2024-0038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing emphasis on sustainability has led to a rise of ESG rating providers, but this expansion has brought challenges. ESG ratings are complex and can vary significantly between agencies, due to different scoring methods and non-standardized disclosures, making accurate assessments difficult. Moreover, investors and companies express limited confidence in the accuracy of these ratings. Regulatory developments aim to improve ESG disclosure and comparability, however, discrepancies in assessment criteria and rating methodologies persist. These aspects have led to the increasing concern of researchers from the academic field and professionals from the financial markets to identify how divergent are the ESG rates provided by various suppliers, what are the causes of this divergence, how do these influence the performance of companies and above all, how the negative effects of divergent ESG rates mitigated. Most researchers focused their attention on the aforementioned aspects on the developed financial markets from the USA or Europe, on the top companies or on the companies listed on the BRIC emerging markets. This article analyzes the divergence of ESG rates provided by three well-known rate-providers, for companies listed on emerging markets in Europe, contributing to increasing knowledge in this field.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟新兴市场的 ESG 评级差异
对可持续发展的日益重视导致 ESG 评级提供商的增加,但这种扩张也带来了挑战。环境、社会和公司治理评级十分复杂,由于评分方法不同和披露信息非标准化,不同机构的评级结果可能大相径庭,因此很难进行准确评估。此外,投资者和公司对这些评级的准确性表示信心有限。监管的发展旨在改善环境、社会和公司治理信息的披露和可比性,但评估标准和评级方法的差异依然存在。这些方面导致学术领域的研究人员和金融市场的专业人士越来越关注以下问题:不同供应商提供的环境、社会和公司治理评级有多大差异;造成这种差异的原因是什么;这些差异如何影响公司的业绩;最重要的是,如何减轻环境、社会和公司治理评级差异的负面影响。大多数研究人员将上述方面的注意力集中在美国或欧洲的发达金融市场、顶级公司或金砖四国新兴市场的上市公司上。本文分析了三家知名评级提供商为欧洲新兴市场上市公司提供的环境、社会和公司治理评级的差异,为增加该领域的知识做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
20
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysis and Classification of Corporate Fraud Based on the Literature and Investigated Cases in Romania The Impact of Digital Marketing on Consumer Behaviour Integrating Sustainability and Digitalization in Business Model Innovation. A Bibliometric Study Developing a Community-Based Participatory Research Program. From Concept to Outcomes Which Factors Help SMES’ Performance Recover Post-Pandemic? The Role of Learning Capability, Intellectual Capital, and Technological Innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1