Calibrating workers’ trust in intelligent automated systems

IF 6.7 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Patterns Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1016/j.patter.2024.101045
Gale M. Lucas, Burcin Becerik-Gerber, Shawn C. Roll
{"title":"Calibrating workers’ trust in intelligent automated systems","authors":"Gale M. Lucas, Burcin Becerik-Gerber, Shawn C. Roll","doi":"10.1016/j.patter.2024.101045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>With the exponential rise in the prevalence of automation, trust in such technology has become more critical than ever before. Trust is confidence in a particular entity, especially in regard to the consequences they can have for the trustor, and calibrated trust is the extent to which the judgments of trust are accurate. The focus of this paper is to reevaluate the general understanding of calibrating trust in automation, update this understanding, and apply it to worker’s trust in automation in the workplace. Seminal models of trust in automation were designed for automation that was already common in workforces, where the machine’s “intelligence” (i.e., capacity for decision making, cognition, and/or understanding) was limited. Now, burgeoning automation with more human-like intelligence is intended to be more interactive with workers, serving in roles such as decision aid, assistant, or collaborative coworker. Thus, we revise “calibrated trust in automation” to include more intelligent automated systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":36242,"journal":{"name":"Patterns","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patterns","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2024.101045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the exponential rise in the prevalence of automation, trust in such technology has become more critical than ever before. Trust is confidence in a particular entity, especially in regard to the consequences they can have for the trustor, and calibrated trust is the extent to which the judgments of trust are accurate. The focus of this paper is to reevaluate the general understanding of calibrating trust in automation, update this understanding, and apply it to worker’s trust in automation in the workplace. Seminal models of trust in automation were designed for automation that was already common in workforces, where the machine’s “intelligence” (i.e., capacity for decision making, cognition, and/or understanding) was limited. Now, burgeoning automation with more human-like intelligence is intended to be more interactive with workers, serving in roles such as decision aid, assistant, or collaborative coworker. Thus, we revise “calibrated trust in automation” to include more intelligent automated systems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
校准工人对智能自动化系统的信任度
随着自动化技术的普及,信任变得比以往任何时候都更加重要。信任是对特定实体的信心,尤其是在它们可能对信任者产生的后果方面,而校准信任则是信任判断的准确程度。本文的重点是重新评估对自动化信任校准的一般理解,更新这一理解,并将其应用于工作场所中工人对自动化的信任。关于自动化信任度的经典模型是针对工作场所中已经很常见的自动化而设计的,在这种情况下,机器的 "智能"(即决策、认知和/或理解能力)是有限的。而现在,正在蓬勃发展的自动化技术拥有更多类似人类的智能,可以与工人进行更多互动,扮演决策辅助、助手或协作同事等角色。因此,我们修改了 "对自动化的校准信任",以纳入更智能的自动化系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Patterns
Patterns Decision Sciences-Decision Sciences (all)
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
4.60%
发文量
153
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
AnnoMate: Exploring and annotating integrated molecular data through custom interactive visualizations Balancing innovation and integrity in peer review The stacking cell puzzle To democratize research with sensitive data, we should make synthetic data more accessible FAIM: Fairness-aware interpretable modeling for trustworthy machine learning in healthcare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1