{"title":"Dynamic choices, temporal invariance and variational discounting","authors":"Bach Dong-Xuan, Philippe Bich","doi":"arxiv-2408.05632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"People often face trade-offs between costs and benefits occurring at various\npoints in time. The predominant discounting approach is to use the exponential\nform. Central to this approach is the discount rate, a unique parameter that\nconverts a future value into its present equivalent. However, a universally\naccepted discount rate remains a matter of ongoing debate and lacks consensus.\nThis paper provides a robust solution for resolving conflicts in discount\nrates, which recommends considering all discount rates but aims to assign\nvarying degrees of importance to these rates. Moreover, a considerable number\nof economists support a theory that suggests equal consideration of future and\npresent utilities. In response to this debate, we introduce a general criterion\ncapable of accommodating situations where it is feasible not to discount future\nutilities. This criterion encompasses and extends various existing criteria in\nthe literature.","PeriodicalId":501188,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.05632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
People often face trade-offs between costs and benefits occurring at various
points in time. The predominant discounting approach is to use the exponential
form. Central to this approach is the discount rate, a unique parameter that
converts a future value into its present equivalent. However, a universally
accepted discount rate remains a matter of ongoing debate and lacks consensus.
This paper provides a robust solution for resolving conflicts in discount
rates, which recommends considering all discount rates but aims to assign
varying degrees of importance to these rates. Moreover, a considerable number
of economists support a theory that suggests equal consideration of future and
present utilities. In response to this debate, we introduce a general criterion
capable of accommodating situations where it is feasible not to discount future
utilities. This criterion encompasses and extends various existing criteria in
the literature.