Jens Gudmundsson, Jens Leth Hougaard, Jay Sethuraman
{"title":"Managing cascading disruptions through optimal liability assignment","authors":"Jens Gudmundsson, Jens Leth Hougaard, Jay Sethuraman","doi":"arxiv-2408.07361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interconnected agents such as firms in a supply chain make simultaneous\npreparatory investments to increase chances of honouring their respective\nbilateral agreements. Failures cascade: if one fails their agreement, then so\ndo all who follow in the chain. Thus, later agents' investments turn out to be\npointless when there is an earlier failure. How losses are shared affects how\nagents invest to avoid the losses in the first place. In this way, a solution\nsets agent liabilities depending on the point of disruption and induces a\nsupermodular investment game. We characterize all efficient solutions. These\nhave the form that later agents -- who are not directly liable for the\ndisruption -- still shoulder some of the losses, justified on the premise that\nthey might have failed anyway. Importantly, we find that such indirect\nliabilities are necessary to avoid unbounded inefficiencies. Finally, we\npinpoint one efficient solution with several desirable properties.","PeriodicalId":501188,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.07361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Interconnected agents such as firms in a supply chain make simultaneous
preparatory investments to increase chances of honouring their respective
bilateral agreements. Failures cascade: if one fails their agreement, then so
do all who follow in the chain. Thus, later agents' investments turn out to be
pointless when there is an earlier failure. How losses are shared affects how
agents invest to avoid the losses in the first place. In this way, a solution
sets agent liabilities depending on the point of disruption and induces a
supermodular investment game. We characterize all efficient solutions. These
have the form that later agents -- who are not directly liable for the
disruption -- still shoulder some of the losses, justified on the premise that
they might have failed anyway. Importantly, we find that such indirect
liabilities are necessary to avoid unbounded inefficiencies. Finally, we
pinpoint one efficient solution with several desirable properties.