Primary care transformation in Scotland: a comparison two cross-sectional national surveys of general practitioners views in 2018 and 2023

Eddie Donaghy, Kieran D Sweeney, Lauren Ng, Hollie Haines, Alexandra Thompson, David Henderson, Harry H.X. Wang, Andrew Thompson, Bruce Guthrie, Stewart W Mercer
{"title":"Primary care transformation in Scotland: a comparison two cross-sectional national surveys of general practitioners views in 2018 and 2023","authors":"Eddie Donaghy, Kieran D Sweeney, Lauren Ng, Hollie Haines, Alexandra Thompson, David Henderson, Harry H.X. Wang, Andrew Thompson, Bruce Guthrie, Stewart W Mercer","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.14.24311940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives\nThe new general practitioner (GP) contract for Scotland, introduced in 2018, established GP Clusters and expanded multidisciplinary team (MDT) working. This paper compares the views of GPs in Scotland regarding the new contract, their working lives, and career intentions in 2018 and 2023.\nMethods\nCross-sectional postal survey of all qualified GPs in Scotland in late 2023 exploring views on Cluster working, MDT-expansion, their working lives, and career intentions, compared with a similar survey from 2018.\nResults\nJob pressure was significantly higher in 2023 than 2018, but overall job satisfaction and negative job attributes were unchanged, while positive job attributes improved. More GPs were planning to reduce their hours and leave direct patient care in 2023 than 2018. Quality leads views on Cluster working were unchanged, with 70-80% reporting insufficient support in both surveys. Cluster knowledge and engagement was unchanged but all GPs showed small but significant increases in understanding of quality improvement. Most felt MDT expansion was insufficient to reduce workload and fewer GPs reported giving longer consultations for complex patients in 2023 than 2018. Significantly more practices were trying to recruit GPs in 2023, and GPs reported worsening NHS services, higher workload, and lower practice sustainability. Only 1 in 20 GPs in the 2023 survey thought that the new contract had improved the care of patients with multimorbidity.\nConclusions\nGPs report few improvements in working life five years after the new contract was introduced, and are responding by planning to reduce their hours or leave direct patient care.","PeriodicalId":501023,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Primary Care Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Primary Care Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.24311940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives The new general practitioner (GP) contract for Scotland, introduced in 2018, established GP Clusters and expanded multidisciplinary team (MDT) working. This paper compares the views of GPs in Scotland regarding the new contract, their working lives, and career intentions in 2018 and 2023. Methods Cross-sectional postal survey of all qualified GPs in Scotland in late 2023 exploring views on Cluster working, MDT-expansion, their working lives, and career intentions, compared with a similar survey from 2018. Results Job pressure was significantly higher in 2023 than 2018, but overall job satisfaction and negative job attributes were unchanged, while positive job attributes improved. More GPs were planning to reduce their hours and leave direct patient care in 2023 than 2018. Quality leads views on Cluster working were unchanged, with 70-80% reporting insufficient support in both surveys. Cluster knowledge and engagement was unchanged but all GPs showed small but significant increases in understanding of quality improvement. Most felt MDT expansion was insufficient to reduce workload and fewer GPs reported giving longer consultations for complex patients in 2023 than 2018. Significantly more practices were trying to recruit GPs in 2023, and GPs reported worsening NHS services, higher workload, and lower practice sustainability. Only 1 in 20 GPs in the 2023 survey thought that the new contract had improved the care of patients with multimorbidity. Conclusions GPs report few improvements in working life five years after the new contract was introduced, and are responding by planning to reduce their hours or leave direct patient care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苏格兰的初级医疗转型:2018 年和 2023 年对全科医生意见的两次横向全国调查比较
目的2018 年苏格兰推出的新全科医生(GP)合同建立了全科医生集群并扩大了多学科团队(MDT)的工作范围。本文比较了 2018 年和 2023 年苏格兰全科医生对新合同、工作生活和职业意向的看法。方法在 2023 年底对苏格兰所有合格的全科医生进行横断面邮寄调查,探讨他们对集群工作、MDT 扩展、工作生活和职业意向的看法,并与 2018 年的类似调查进行比较。结果2023 年的工作压力明显高于 2018 年,但总体工作满意度和消极工作属性保持不变,而积极工作属性有所改善。与2018年相比,更多的全科医生计划在2023年减少工时并离开直接的患者护理工作。质量负责人对小组工作的看法没有变化,在两次调查中,70%-80%的质量负责人表示支持力度不够。小组的知识和参与度没有变化,但所有全科医生对质量改进的理解都有小幅但显著的提高。大多数人认为 MDT 的扩展不足以减少工作量,与 2018 年相比,2023 年报告为复杂病人提供更长时间会诊的全科医生人数减少。2023年,试图招聘全科医生的诊所数量明显增加,全科医生报告说,NHS服务日益恶化,工作量增加,诊所的可持续性降低。在 2023 年的调查中,每 20 名全科医生中只有 1 人认为新合同改善了对多病症患者的护理。结论全科医生报告称,新合同实施五年后,他们的工作生活几乎没有改善,他们正计划减少工时或离开直接的患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perceived barriers to research and scholarship among physicians Providing an e-cigarette starter kit for smoking cessation and reduction as adjunct to usual care to smokers with a mental health condition: Findings from the ESCAPE feasibility study Primary Care Physicians' Practices and Barriers in Evaluating and Managing Chronic Kidney Disease in New Providence, The Bahamas Development and evaluation of codelists for identifying marginalised groups in primary care Pharmacist Impact on First-Line Antihypertensives in African American Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1