Victims’ Perspectives on Participation in the Ongwen Case

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW Journal of International Criminal Justice Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1093/jicj/mqae035
Paolina Massidda, Joseph Akwenyu, Luke Moffett
{"title":"Victims’ Perspectives on Participation in the Ongwen Case","authors":"Paolina Massidda, Joseph Akwenyu, Luke Moffett","doi":"10.1093/jicj/mqae035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Ongwen case has so far involved one of the largest number of victims represented before the International Criminal Court, both in terms of participation in trial proceedings (4,095) and potential beneficiaries for reparations (49,772). This piece offers some new insights following the trial from victims represented by both victim legal teams that are not captured in victims’ statements or submissions before the Court. It draws on additional interviews with victims after the completion of the trial and sentencing, but before the reparation order issued in the case. It focuses on three elements — victims’ role in proceedings; how victims felt they were represented before the Court; and victims’ satisfaction with the outcome of the proceedings.","PeriodicalId":46732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Criminal Justice","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqae035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Ongwen case has so far involved one of the largest number of victims represented before the International Criminal Court, both in terms of participation in trial proceedings (4,095) and potential beneficiaries for reparations (49,772). This piece offers some new insights following the trial from victims represented by both victim legal teams that are not captured in victims’ statements or submissions before the Court. It draws on additional interviews with victims after the completion of the trial and sentencing, but before the reparation order issued in the case. It focuses on three elements — victims’ role in proceedings; how victims felt they were represented before the Court; and victims’ satisfaction with the outcome of the proceedings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
受害者对参与翁古文案的看法
翁古文案是迄今为止在国际刑事法院有代表的受害者人数最多的案件之一,无论是在参与审判程序方面(4 095 人)还是在赔偿的潜在受益人方面(49 772 人)都是如此。这篇报道提供了两个受害人法律小组所代表的受害人在审判后提出的一些新见解,这些见解在受害人的陈述或向法院提交的材料中没有体现。本文还借鉴了在审判和判决结束后,但在案件发布赔偿令之前对受害者进行的额外访谈。报告重点关注三个方面--被害人在诉讼程序中的作用;被害人认为他们在法庭上的代表情况;以及被害人对诉讼结果的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
22.20%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The Journal of International Criminal Justice aims to promote a profound collective reflection on the new problems facing international law. Established by a group of distinguished criminal lawyers and international lawyers, the Journal addresses the major problems of justice from the angle of law, jurisprudence, criminology, penal philosophy, and the history of international judicial institutions. It is intended for graduate and post-graduate students, practitioners, academics, government officials, as well as the hundreds of people working for international criminal courts.
期刊最新文献
The Biological Weapons Amendment to the ICC Statute and National Provisions Victims’ Perspectives on Participation in the Ongwen Case Witnessing Ongwen The Ongwen Case at the International Criminal Court as a Test of the Court’s Outreach Programming in Northern Uganda Targeted Sanctions as a Pathway to Accountability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1