Where are inequalities produced? Comparing the variations of graduate employment between the UK’s districts and universities

IF 3.2 2区经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Socio-Economic Review Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1093/ser/mwae052

Yang Yu

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents the first set of estimates of inequalities in high-status employment between UK districts and universities. Making use of graduate data from the Higher Education Statistics Agency, this study compares how graduates’ employment and social mobility vary based on their place of origin and the university attended. Inequality and social mobility are measured by the chance of entering a higher professional occupation 15 months after graduation. The results showed that the occupation inequalities between universities were much larger than those between local authority districts, indicating that our higher education system is evidently (re)producing an even greater amount of inequality than spatial disparities. These findings contribute to the emerging academic and policy narrative regarding the social and geographic inequalities in the UK, addressing the inequalities in graduate employment across universities may be crucial in meeting the demands of the labor market and driving upward mobility throughout the country.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

不平等在哪里产生？比较英国各地区和各大学毕业生就业率的差异

本研究首次对英国地区和大学之间高地位就业的不平等现象进行了估算。本研究利用高等教育统计局提供的毕业生数据，比较了毕业生的就业和社会流动性如何因其原籍地和就读大学而有所不同。不平等和社会流动性是通过毕业 15 个月后进入更高专业职业的机会来衡量的。结果显示，大学之间的职业不平等远远大于地方当局地区之间的职业不平等，这表明我们的高等教育体系显然（再）产生了比空间差异更大的不平等。这些研究结果为新出现的有关英国社会和地域不平等的学术和政策论述做出了贡献，解决大学之间毕业生就业不平等问题对于满足劳动力市场需求和推动全国范围内的向上流动至关重要。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Socio-Economic Review Multiple-

CiteScore

6.80

自引率

10.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： Originating in the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics (SASE), Socio-Economic Review (SER) is part of a broader movement in the social sciences for the rediscovery of the socio-political foundations of the economy. Devoted to the advancement of socio-economics, it deals with the analytical, political and moral questions arising at the intersection between economy and society. Articles in SER explore how the economy is or should be governed by social relations, institutional rules, political decisions, and cultural values. They also consider how the economy in turn affects the society of which it is part, for example by breaking up old institutional forms and giving rise to new ones. The domain of the journal is deliberately broadly conceived, so new variations to its general theme may be discovered and editors can learn from the papers that readers submit. To enhance international dialogue, Socio-Economic Review accepts the submission of translated articles that are simultaneously published in a language other than English. In pursuit of its program, SER is eager to promote interdisciplinary dialogue between sociology, economics, political science and moral philosophy, through both empirical and theoretical work. Empirical papers may be qualitative as well as quantitative, and theoretical papers will not be confined to deductive model-building. Papers suggestive of more generalizable insights into the economy as a domain of social action will be preferred over narrowly specialized work. While firmly committed to the highest standards of scholarly excellence, Socio-Economic Review encourages discussion of the practical and ethical dimensions of economic action, with the intention to contribute to both the advancement of social science and the building of a good economy in a good society.